The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) is publishing monthly Transit Savings Report to illustrate the purportedly great savings that can be achieved by giving up the car and traveling by transit instead. APTA compares the average cost of buying a monthly transit pass to replace a car, which is assumed to travel 15,000 miles annually.
The latest edition was made public on April 6 and reveals astounding savings, as was reported by The Wall Street Journal and other press-release echoing press outlets. The APTA release indicates that households could save from $8,174 to $13,784 annually by giving up a car for transit in the 20 urban areas with the highest transit ridership. Overall, the APTA figures calculate to an average savings of $10,183. The APTA press release does not say how much the monthly bus pass would cost. However, our own quick survey of 17 major transit systems indicates that a monthly pass averages approximately $90 per month, or $1,080 per year. This means that getting rid of the car and riding transit instead saves approximately 90%, ($10,183 divided by [$1,080 + $10,183]) at least according to APTA (Note).
With savings such as these, a visitor from Mars to APTA’s Fantasyland might expect that nearly all urban travel should logically be by transit rather than by cars. But, alas, no. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, cars, which APTA tells us cost nearly 10 times transit, account for more than 98% of motorized travel in US urban areas.
Profligate Americans? What could possibly explain this paradox? Surely, there is plenty of evidence that Americans would much rather spend less than more on products of equal value. This has been painfully evident to “legacy” airlines that have had to lower their prices to compete with discount carriers like Southwest Airlines. Traditional supermarkets have lost hoards of customers stores like Wal-Mart or Costco over amounts that pale by comparison to the savings that APTA would have us believe are so readily available by rejecting our “love affair” with the automobile.
Of course, the choice is not that simple. Americans no more have a love affair with the automobile than with flush toilets or refrigerators. The American (and Canadian, Australian, European and Asian) love affair is not with products, but rather with the better life style that the products make possible. People have refrigerators because they keep food fresh and prevent spoiling. Under certain circumstances, however, refrigerators are not practical, such as when one uses a cooler instead at a picnic. Transit is like that. It makes sense for some trips, but not a large share in the overall scheme of things.
The Largest Downtowns: Where Transit Works Best: For the overwhelming majority of trips, the automobile provides much faster and generally more comfortable travel than can be made available by transit. There are times, however, when transit is superior. For example, the car is particularly impractical for commuting into crowded Manhattan, which is served by an enormous subway, commuter rail and bus system that extends to the further reaches of the metropolitan area.
This is evident in data from the latest US Bureau of the Census American Community Survey, which indicates that transit accounts for 80% of the motorized commuter travel to Manhattan. Manhattan’s business district has nearly 2,000,000 jobs in a relatively small area, and riding transit and the average transit commute is only slightly longer than the average car commute. With Manhattan’s world class traffic, transit is a demonstrably superior competitor to the car.
This, in reality, simply demonstrates that transit is “about downtown.” Consumer preferences demonstrate that commuting to some of the nation’s largest downtown areas is better by transit. The impressive skyscrapers can leave the impression that downtowns are dominant in metropolitan employment. However, downtowns represent only 10% of metropolitan employment. The largest downtowns are well situated for transit service, by virtue of their high employment densities and the fact that transit systems focus on them.
These include central business districts, including New York’s Manhattan and Brooklyn, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia and San Francisco. All of these downtown areas where transit is dominant were added together, they would cover barely one-third of the expanse Orlando’s Walt Disney World. But consumer preferences also show that the car provides superior mobility to virtually all other destinations. Our already heavily indebted public sector could not begin to provide a level of service to replicate transit’s downtown access throughout the urban area.
Transit even has difficulty competing in the dense outer boroughs of New York City. While slightly more people commute to Brooklyn jobs by transit than by car, the reverse is true in the Bronx. Twice as many people commute to jobs in Queens by car than transit, despite the borough’s having a population density greater than that of San Francisco, the nation’s second most dense large municipality.
Transit’s share falls off even more sharply in the suburbs of New York. Nine times as many people commuting to jobs in inner suburban Nassau County use cars as use transit. Commuters to outer suburban Suffolk County use cars 40 times as much as transit.
Consumers make these choices not because cars are inherently superior to transit or vice versa. A commuter who lives in New Brunswick, New Jersey and works in Manhattan, usually takes a New Jersey Transit train or bus to work, because the car competes poorly for such a trip. The neighbor, however, who works in the suburban I-287 corridor takes the car, because transit cannot compete for that trip.
It remains true that for the overwhelming majority of trips cars meet the needs of consumers far better than transit. Cars are faster and deliver people within walking distance of their destinations.
Even the ultimate — making transit free — makes little difference. In 1990, Austin, Texas eliminated fares. Yet the share of travel in the Austin area by car declined about a quarter of one percent. For most urban travel, transit is so uncompetitive that you can’t even give it away.
Note: None of the above should be interpreted to be an acceptance of the APTA figures. APTA assumes annual parking costs of $1,850, yet most parking outside downtowns. Some might object that there is a cost to this free parking, but to ignore its costs is quite appropriate, given that APTA’s figures do not include subsidies to transit, which would quadruple its cost. Further, APTA uses especially high costs for automobile use, which assume that everyone purchases a new car every five years. This substantially overstates the cost of cars relative to transit.
Wendell Cox is a Visiting Professor, Conservatoire National des Arts et Metiers, Paris. He was born in Los Angeles and was appointed to three terms on the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission by Mayor Tom Bradley. He is the author of “War on the Dream: How Anti-Sprawl Policy Threatens the Quality of Life.
Photo: New Jersey Turnpike
Comments
22 responses to “When Saving 90% is Not Enough: The Transit Savings Report”
Washington, DC – Heading into the end of the year public transportation riders have a little more money in their pockets. As gas prices rise this holiday season, switching from driving to riding public transportation is a proven way for individuals to cut monthly and yearly transportation costs, while also reducing their carbon footprint.Japanese used cars|Japanese used vehicles
Hello, thanks a lot for helping me to understand. Much obliged. Is it ok for me to place a link on my site pointing to yours? The customers on my site would be really riveted by your posts. Cheers.
Stephanie | free walmart gift card
Hello, many thanks for sharing this. I’m in your debt. Do you think I could place a link on my site pointing to yours? Many of my subscribers will be rather impressed with all that you have presented here. Thank you.
Ben
Hello there, cheers for making it clear. I totally owe you one. Is it ok for me to link to this page? My subscribers would be rather riveted by your posts. Thanks a lot.
Sasha | Schwinn 430 Elliptical Trainer
Really trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading.@!@!@@@!@@
clubmz reviews
Nice to be visiting your blog again, it has been months for me. Well this article that i’ve been waited for so long. I need this article to complete my task in the college, and it has same topic with your article. Thanks, great split.us open tennis championship tickets
Nice post, I really like this post style.
Ivan @ Ivan @ make something
I don’t think you can infer anything about how much people value transit from property prices unless you control for the other variables that affect property prices, at least the major ones. Property prices vary dramatically between different areas within the same transit system. Look at New York.
Almost all newer development in the U.S. is low density and car oriented. That makes it difficult to serve effectively with transit. For transit to be efficient and even remotely competitive with cars on travel times and convenience, you need much higher densities than are typical in American metropolitan areas.
free cell phone spy software
my freind have 2 cars. One his family and second one his own. he pays monthly charge of parking that a big amount. he has bear many more expenditure of cars like car key programming ,wash car, maintanance etc
it’s an awesome news that APTA calculate The average savings of US people is $10,183 form car.This article shows me some information about Us people savings from Vehicle.
Dallas car accident lawyer
This site is so helpful. So I want some information for sharing this side with some of my friend. Thanks for sharing the information in this article.apartments for rent in Pittsburgh
e above should be interpreted to be an acceptance of the APTA figures. APTA assumes annual parking costs of $1,850, yet most parking outside downtowns. Some might object that there is a cost to this free parking, but to ignore its costs is quite appropriate, given that APTA’s figures do not include subsidies to transit, which would quadruple its cost. Further, APTA uses especially high costs for automobile use, which
iphone conversion kit
iphone 4s conversion kit
iphone 4 conversion kit
aoda yoyo
auldey yoyo
yoyo shop
sound magic
gevey supreme
gevey ultra
apple peel 520
apple peel 520 2nd generation
acekard 2i
vold miracle
buy vold miracle
PS3 True blue
True blue PS3
buy True blue
Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I am very glad to see such great information being shared freely out there. best hd tv to buy
APTA uses especially high costs for automobile use, which assume that everyone purchases a new car every five years. This substantially overstates the cost of cars relative to transit.
menopause
Glad to hear everything is going well. Sounds as if you’re making good time and I’ve still got to clean the beams yet!
resolucion de problemas matematicos
The facts you’ve shared here is very good, I may not be mastering it if not obtaining the clarification from your post. This is truely a trustworthy blog site. I may care to take the opportunity to browse your weblog to grab extra material. Your niche blog may be a good income machine should you enhance it. Work at Home
As an article and blogger lover, i might say that, your article is very impressive. I never read this kind of article before. It really gives me a creep when i read your article. I will recommend this to my fellow reader alquiler coches aeropuerto
Transit’s share falls off even more sharply in the suburbs of New York. Nine times as many people commuting to jobs in inner suburban Nassau County use cars as use transit.
Patrik Antonius
Our already heavily indebted public sector could not begin to provide a level of service to replicate transit’s downtown access throughout the urban area.
organized labor
I was unlikely yet the minute I started viewing it, I got seriously fascinated. Thanks a lot for sharing. Regards
Ivermectin
Is there any place in the world where they have free transit, except for SF? Just curious
-Adrianne from Meet new people at the Mirage Hotel
Great! Thanks for the great article posting and your all effort. I think the above article is valuable for all concerned people about this topics. For me the Informations are really really useful for my research. I’ve Bookmarked this page for future reference
hotel rooms London