The Accelerating Suburbanization of New York

Some of the best evidence that the tide has not turned against dispersion and suburbanization comes from an unlikely source:  New York’s 2010 census results. If dense urbanism works anywhere in America, it does within this greatest of US traditional urban areas.

Before the actual count, the Census Bureau estimated, in large part as a result of a successful historical core municipality (city of New York) challenges, that as of Census Day (April 1, 2010), the city would have added 413,000 residents since 2000 and would have accounted for more than one-half of the metropolitan area growth. But the numbers turned out startlingly different. In fact, the city’s census count came in nearly 250,000 below projections and accounted for the lowest share of New York metropolitan area growth since the 1970s.

Overall the 2010 census figures paint a picture of continuing dispersion in the nation’s largest metropolitan area, New York. The metropolitan area stretches from Manhattan, with the world’s second largest business district (after Tokyo) to the four outer boroughs of the city of New York, more than 100 miles to the eastern end of Long Island, north to Putnam and Rockland counties, completely across northern New Jersey, jumping the Delaware River to include Pike County, Pennsylvania and south to Ocean County (New Jersey), nearly all the way to Atlantic City. In all, this 23 county metropolitan area has the nation’s largest population and actually extended its margin over second place Los Angeles, which has been converted from a growth leader to a laggard giant growing slower than most Midwestern metropolitan areas. New York added 574,000 residents, while Los Angeles added 473,000. If New York continues to add more people than Los Angeles in future censuses, its position as the nation’s largest metropolitan area be secure.

Major metropolitan areas in general did poorly in terms of growth in the new cesusus. This was particularly true in New York. Between 2000 and 2010, the New York metropolitan area population rose from 18,323,000 to 18,897,000, a modest growth rate of 3.1 percent, one of the slowest among major metropolitan areas in the country. The national growth rate was three times as high

Suburbanization Accelerating Again: If you had read the New York Times and other Manhattan-based media over the last decade you would have assumed the suburbs were in decline and cities ascendant, particularly in the New York area. Yet in reality over the past decade, the suburban counties captured their largest share of New York metropolitan area growth in three decades. During the 2000s, the suburbs accounted for 71 percent of growth, up from 54 percent during the 1990s and 48 percent in the 1980s. The outer suburbs grew the fastest, while the inner suburbs – some of which are denser than historical core municipalities in other metropolitan areas – grew faster than the historical core municipality, the city of New York (Figure 1 and Table)

 

NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA
POPULATION TREND BY COUNTY: 2000 TO 2010
2000 2010 Change %
HISTORIC CORE MUNICIPALITY (New York)
Bronx County, NY       1,332,650       1,385,108        52,458 3.9%
Kings County, NY       2,465,326       2,504,700        39,374 1.6%
New York County, NY       1,537,195       1,585,873        48,678 3.2%
Queens County, NY       2,229,379       2,230,722          1,343 0.1%
Richmond County, NY         443,728         468,730        25,002 5.6%
Subtotal       8,008,278       8,175,133       166,855 2.1%
INNER SUBURBAN
Bergen County, NJ         884,118         905,116        20,998 2.4%
Essex County, NJ         793,633         783,969         (9,664) -1.2%
Hudson County, NJ         608,975         634,266        25,291 4.2%
Middlesex County, NJ         750,162         809,858        59,696 8.0%
Nassau County, NY       1,334,544       1,339,532          4,988 0.4%
Passaic County, NJ         489,049         501,226        12,177 2.5%
Union County, NJ         522,541         536,499        13,958 2.7%
Westchester County, NY         923,459         949,113        25,654 2.8%
Subtotal       6,306,481       6,459,579       153,098 2.4%
OUTER SUBURBAN
Hunterdon County, NJ         121,989         128,349          6,360 5.2%
Monmouth County, NJ         615,301         630,380        15,079 2.5%
Morris County, NJ         470,212         492,276        22,064 4.7%
Ocean County, NJ         510,916         576,567        65,651 12.8%
Pike County, PA           46,302           57,369        11,067 23.9%
Putnam County, NY           95,745           99,710          3,965 4.1%
Rockland County, NY         286,753         311,687        24,934 8.7%
Somerset County, NJ         297,490         323,444        25,954 8.7%
Suffolk County, NY       1,419,369       1,493,350        73,981 5.2%
Sussex County, NJ         144,166         149,265          5,099 3.5%
Subtotal       4,008,243       4,262,397       254,154 6.3%
SUBTOTAL: SUBURBAN     10,314,724     10,721,976       407,252 3.9%
TOTAL     18,323,002     18,897,109       574,107 3.1%

 

Critically, the city of New York did worse than at any time since the 800,000 population loss that was sustained in the 1970s, representing all of the loss since 1950. Between 1950 and 1980 the suburbs added 3.9 million residents. The city’s fortunes had improved measurably in the 1980s and 1990s, with approximately one-half of the metropolitan area’s growth. The last decade’s share of metropolitan area growth – only 29 percent – in the historical core municipality indicates a startling acceleration of dispersion, although fortunately not a return to the population decline of the 1970s (Figure 2).

City of New York: The city of New York grew from 8,008,000 to 8,175,000 between 2000 and 2010, a rate of 2.1 percent.

Staten Island (Richmond County), which is largely suburban in form, was the fastest growing of New York’s boroughs, with a growth rate of 5.6 percent. The Bronx grew the second fastest, at a rate of 3.9 percent. Only Staten Island and Queens (below) reached their population peaks in the 2010 census (Figure 3).

The Bronx has experienced perhaps the nation’s most successful urban turn-arounds, after a disastrous period in the 1970s and 1980s, when large swaths of the South Bronx were literally leveled. The population fell from 1,472,000 in 1970 to 1,204,000 in 1990. By 2010, the population had recovered nearly two-thirds of the loss, to 1,385,000.

Manhattan (New York County) added 3.2 percent to its population (49,000) and reached 1,586,000. This is approximately one-third below its population peak of 2,232,000 in 1910.   Manhattan’s population, however, remained approximately 45,000 below the Census Bureau estimates.

Brooklyn (Kings County) continues to be the largest borough in New York, with 2,505,000 residents, an increase of 39,000 (1.6 percent) between 2000 and 2010. Brooklyn reached its population peak of 2,738,000 in 1950. Brooklyn’s population proved approximately 75,000 below the Census Bureau’s estimates.

The slowest growing borough was Queens, which added only 2,000 residents (a 0.1 percent population increase), yet reached its population peak of 2,231,000. Queens had added more residents than any other borough since 1950 and added approximately 275,000 residents in the 1990 to 2000 census period.

Inner Ring Suburbs: The inner ring counties (Nassau, Westchester, Bergen, Passaic, Essex, Hudson, Union and Middlesex) grew 2.4 percent from 6,306,000 to 6,460,000. Growth rates varied significantly, from a loss of 1.2 percent in Essex County (where Newark is located) to 8.0 percent in Middlesex County. Middlesex County includes newer suburban areas further away from the core than in any other inner ring county. Much of the Middlesex County growth occurred in these areas. The inner ring suburbs captured 26.7 percent of the metropolitan area growth.

Outer Ring Suburbs: By far the e fastest growth was in the outer ring counties, with a population increase of 6.3 percent, from 4,008,000 to 4,262,000. Monmouth County was the slowest growing outer ring county, adding 2.5 percent to its population. Pike County, Pennsylvania, which is the farthest to the west of any county in the metropolitan area, had by far the highest growth rate, at 23.8 percent. Ocean County, New Jersey, had the second fastest growth rate, at 12.8 percent. Ocean County lies at the extreme southern end of the metropolitan area. The outer ring counties captured 44.3 percent of the metropolitan area growth.

Suburban Growth and Projections: Overall suburban growth was from 10,314,000 to 10,712,000, for a gain of 407,000 (4.0 percent). This was above the Census Bureau estimate of 392,000. The suburbs now contain 57 percent of the metropolitan area population.

New York’s Continuing Dispersion: The dispersion of the 2000s is an extension of the overall metropolitan area trend since 1950 (Note). The historical core municipality, New York, has added less than 300,000 residents, or 3.6 percent. The suburbs have added 5.3 million residents, nearly doubling their population. Approximately 95 percent of the metropolitan area’s growth was in the suburbs between 1950 and 2010 (Figure 4).

The dispersion is apparent even in the city of New York. Since 1950, Queens, the outermost of the inner four boroughs, added nearly 700,000 residents, while the more inner boroughs of Manhattan, Brooklyn and the Bronx, lost nearly as many residents. Overall these four inner boroughs gained only 6,000 residents since 1950. Staten Island, which is largely post-war suburban, grew 277,000, while the city overall was growing by 283,000, leaving only a net gain of 6,000 for the four inner boroughs of New York.

A recent newgeography.com article documents similar patterns in employment dispersion and commuting during the 1990 to 2008 period.

Consistency with the National Trend: The accelerating suburbanization of New York is consistent with the national trends in major metropolitan areas in the new census data. Between 1990 and 2000, historical core municipalities accounted for 15 percent of metropolitan area growth. Between 2000 and 2010, the share of historical core municipality growth had fallen to 9 percent.

Note: This analysis is based upon the metropolitan area boundaries as currently defined.

Wendell Cox is a Visiting Professor, Conservatoire National des Arts et Metiers, Paris and the author of “War on the Dream: How Anti-Sprawl Policy Threatens the Quality of Life

Photo by Mike Lee

Comments

33 responses to “The Accelerating Suburbanization of New York”

  1. jay11 Avatar
    jay11

    This was a really great contest and hopefully I can attend the next one. It was alot of fun and I really enjoyed myself..
    http://www.thomsoncatering.com.sg

    1. dhea Avatar
      dhea

      Together these factors — resources, backlinks and information technology and changing demographics — augur well for the future of the Great Plains. Once forlorn and seemingly soon-to-be abandoned, the Great Plains enters the 21st century with a prairie wind at its back.

  2. jay11 Avatar
    jay11

    Thanks for sharing this information. I really like your blog post very much. You have really shared a informative and interesting blog post with people..
    Business sales

  3. hyutars Avatar
    hyutars

    Some of the best evidence that the tide has not turned Denpa Kyoushi against dispersion and suburbanization comes from an unlikely source:  New York’s 2010 census results. If dense urbanism works anywhere in America, it does within this greatest of US traditional urban areas.
    Before the actual count, the Census Bureau Aikatsu! anime watch estimated, in large part as a result of a successful historical core municipality (city of New York) challenges, that as of Census Day (April 1, 2010), the city would have added 413,0

  4. linksmega Avatar
    linksmega

    It such a amazing to be a part of top institute and learn some great education for future. Due to less time people prefer online education, but the big problem was high essays capital stranded of online education and we try our best to provide some out class educational and writing help through our simple and great online channel.

  5. zara1 Avatar
    zara1

    Wow… awesome post, I was wondering from one post to another blog in search on such a unique and nice post. Finally I found it here.
    House Removal

    1. tarneema Avatar
      tarneema

      In all, this 23 county metropolitan area has the nation’s largest population and actually extended its margin over second place Los Angeles, which has been flame cut outs converted from a growth leader to a laggard giant growing slower than most Midwestern metropolitan areas.

  6. robert1122 Avatar
    robert1122

    Thank you for some other informative website. The place else may just I get that kind of information written in such a perfect method? I have a venture that I am simply now running on, and I’ve been at the glance out for such info.
    energy comparison

  7. juliaware Avatar
    juliaware

    I really like the way you start and conclude your thoughts. Thank you so much for this information. keep posting such good stuff.Aluminium ladder FRP Ladder Extension Ladder Ladder Trolley FRP Grating

  8. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    You’ve got some interesting points in this article. I would have never considered any of these if I didn’t come across this. Thanks!.
    คาสิโนออนไลน์.tv

  9. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    I recently found many useful information in your website especially this blog page. Among the lots of comments on your articles. Thanks for sharing.
    artdeceau.eu

  10. robert1122 Avatar
    robert1122

    Nice to read your article! I am looking forward to sharing your adventures and experiences.
    Dog Magazine

  11. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    All the contents you mentioned in post is too good and can be very useful. I will keep it in mind, thanks for sharing the information keep updating, looking forward for more posts.Thanks
    Discover Ceva 2012

  12. reshhia Avatar
    reshhia

    The article provides no information on the population of the entire urban area in 2100. The Prefecture of Tokyo constitutes plagiarism checker free somewhat over one third of the present population of the urban area.

  13. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    very interesting post.this is my first time visit here.i found so mmany interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion..thanks for the post!
    Healthy Relationship with Bioco Medical

  14. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    Thank you again for all the knowledge you distribute,Good post. I was very interested in the article, it’s quite inspiring I should admit. I like visiting you site since I always come across interesting articles like this one.Great Job, I greatly appreciate that.Do Keep sharing! Regards. pgam’s official

  15. james17 Avatar
    james17

    When adjectives are certified by quite (particularly when it indicates.
    xbox live gold gratuit

  16. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    Very useful info. Hope to see more posts soon!.
    avsservice.be

  17. jn27 Avatar
    jn27

    Wrought metal generate way gateways are an ideal way to complete off your generate. depression test

  18. jonnnn Avatar
    jonnnn

    If you are working on the dissertation and are not sure where to start then we can help! We offer a comprehensive service, and that means that no matter what stage of the dissertation process you are in, we can give you the assistance that you need. We can help with a proposal, which is what you write to make sure that you have a good topic and some ideas for the paper. phd programs online

  19. reshhia Avatar
    reshhia

    I should also do their best for my own web page like I see some excellent and modified operating in your web page. create your own anime character

  20. robert1122 Avatar
    robert1122

    Wonderful article, thanks for putting this together! This is obviously one great post. Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here.
    becoming a tutor

  21. robert1122 Avatar
    robert1122

    Excellent information on your blog, thank you for taking the time to share with us. Amazing insight you have on this, it’s nice to find a website that details so much information about different artists.
    ottawa dry cleaners

  22. robert1122 Avatar
    robert1122

    Wonderful article, thanks for putting this together! This is obviously one great post. Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here.
    Symbolic Concierge

    1. menotorres Avatar
      menotorres

      Really impressed! Everything is very open and very clear clarification of issues. It contains truly facts. Your website is very valuable.

      travel

  23. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    Very well written information. It will be valuable to anyone who employess it, including me. Keep doing what you are doing – for sure i will check out more posts.
    Guaranteed Loan

  24. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    very interesting post.this is my first time visit here.i found so mmany interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion..thanks for the post!
    yourik studio wedding photographer

  25. zion1122 Avatar
    zion1122

    Nice post! This is a very nice blog that I will definitively come back to more times this year! Thanks for informative post.
    American sex offenders

  26. deen Avatar
    deen

    This is nice post and i will come back as you have you gien us very good advice.
    Depression test

    1. zacharyhenry54 Avatar
      zacharyhenry54

      Very good blog post! Thought about valued all the looking at. I hope to find out alot more of your stuff. I presume you might fantastic information and furthermore prospect. I am just exceptionally satisfied utilizing this type of critical information.
      cell phone spy
      clubmz reviews

  27. james17 Avatar
    james17

    Crowdsourcing has proven to be an efficient and efficient way to produce and maintain respected datasets, sources, and academic sources. http://www.tmt06.com