Decidedly, early June has not been the best of times for the California high-speed rail project.
On June 2, came a new poll showing that fifty-nine percent of voters would now oppose building high-speed rail if the measure were placed on the ballot again. Sixty-nine percent said that they would "never or hardly ever" ride the bullet train if it were built. (USC Dornsife/LA Times survey). The poll made news throughout the state, and indeed nationally. The public was treated to headlines such as "Voters have turned against California bullet train" (LA Times); "California high speed rail losing support" (Bloomberg); "California high speed rail doesn’t have the support of majority of Californians" (Huffington Post); "Voters don’t trust state to build high speed rail" (CalWatchdog) and "Poll finds California voters are experiencing buyers’ remorse" (Associated Press).
Then, on the heels of the poll, came news that Central Valley farm groups have filed a major environmental lawsuit asking for preliminary injunction to block rail construction slated to begin later this year. Plaintiffs include the Madera and Merced county farm bureaus and Madera County. Still more agricultural interests in the Central Valley are reportedly threatening to sue.
The Sierra Club, traditionally a loyal supporter of Gov. Brown, announced it was "strongly opposed" to Brown’s proposal to eliminate California environmental (CEQA) requirements for the high speed rail program and its Central Valley construction project. The Brown administration has made its proposal despite a solemn promise to the legislature by the Authority’s Chairman, Dan Richard, that they would never try to bypass CEQA ("We have never and we will never come to you and ask you to mess with the CEQA requirements for the project level").
The multi-billion dollar HSR program is exactly the sort of large scale public works project that CEQA was designed to address, wrote Kathryn Phillips, Sierra Club’s Director in a June 5 letter to the Governor. "By removing a large-scale project such as high-speed rail from full CEQA coverage, the proposal grants the state a status that suggests it does not have to fully and seriously consider and mitigate environmental impacts. … In the interests of the environment and in the interest of rebuilding public support for rail in this state, we urge you in the strongest possible terms to abandon the proposal to weaken environmental review for the high-speed rail system," the letter concludes.
Nor was this the end to unwelcome news for the Brown administration. A series of editorials and opinion pieces by some of California’s most influential columnists has reinforced the public’s growing disenchantment with the bullet train project and with the Governor’s stubborn determination to defy public opinion.
In a June 3 commentary, the Sacramento Bee columnist Dan Walters, a longtime observer of the legislative scene, refuted the Governor’s attempt to compare the high speed rail project with the iconic Golden Gate Bridge. Both projects, the Governor had said in a ceremony marking the 75th anniversary of the bridge, took much political courage and foresight, and both will go down in history as remarkable gifts to posterity.
"Nice try, Governor," wrote Walters, but the comparison is misleading. The need for the Golden Gate crossing was clearly demonstrable and the bridge used revenue bonds to be repaid with bridge tolls. The need for a bullet train, on the other hand, "exists only in the minds of its ardent backers" and the Governor assumes that the federal government will finance nearly two-thirds of the project’s cost—an assumption that is nothing more than wishful thinking. Asked Walters, if the train is as financially viable as Brown and the Authority insist it is, why wouldn’t they do what the bridge builders did — float revenue bonds to be repaid from the train’s supposed operating profits. "Public works projects make sense when they fit well-documented needs. When they don’t, they are just political ego trips," Walters concluded.
Daniel Borenstein, columnist and editorial writer for the Contra Costa Times, came to a similar conclusion. In pushing for the bullet train, he wrote, Gov. Brown is motivated by a quest for a legacy. But, the columnist warned, while the Governor strives to be remembered like his late father for the capital projects he leaves behind, he could derail the November tax measure by his "reckless exuberance for spending billions on high speed rail." "Does he really want to anger [the voters] when he needs them the most?" Borenstein asked.
Perhaps the most devastating criticism of the Governor’s high speed rail initiative came in a June 8 editorial in the San Jose Mercury News, one of the Bay Area’s most influential newspapers. Entitled "High Speed Rail Plan is Delusional" the editorial has been syndicated in a number of Bay Area and Los Angeles Sunday papers. Follow this link to read it at the Mercury News website.
Comments
21 responses to “More Unwelcome News for the California High Speed Rail Project”
I have also heard that they will be building new steel truss bridge and make the final proposal within this year. Good thing that they did not stop and keep on thinking for projects, small or big for the improvement of their country.
Plaintiffs include the Madera and Merced county farm bureaus and Madera County.buy twitter followers
Brown, announced it was “strongly opposed” to Brown’s proposal to eliminate California environmental (CEQA) requirements for the high speed rail program and its Central Valley construction project. SEO Software
I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post acupuncture corona del mar
A series of editorials and opinion pieces by some of California’s most influential columnists has reinforced the public’s growing disenchantment with the bullet train project and with the Governor’s stubborn determination to defy public opinion acupuncture shingles pain
In a June 3 commentary, the Sacramento Bee columnist Dan Walters, a longtime observer of the legislative scene, refuted the Governor’s attempt to compare the high speed rail project with the iconic Golden Gate Bridge Plastic Machines
For students who just completed their education and looking for job http://www.abc-article.com/ has updated an article having tips which may be helpful for them to get a job, we recommend you to like us on facebook to get latest article submission updates at your wall.
The need for the Golden Gate crossing was clearly demonstrable and the bridge used revenue bonds to be repaid with bridge tolls. Desenvolvimento de Software
Thanks for your sharing .Your thoughts are creative and they actually do help to me. It provides me with a lot of information. It is a nice post!
Topes estacionamiento
Nice post.Thank you for taking the time to publish this information very useful! I agree with many the points made in this content and how well-researched this appears to be. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!
tapete bienvenida
Self Managed Super Funds is something that you can use after your retirement. You can also use this fund to invest in any kind of property if it comes under the rules. However, it is essential to carry out SMSF audit once in a year. According to Australian Tax Office, it should be only undertaken by self-managed superannuation fund audit services as they aware of all the legal and taxation obligations about SMSF.
Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues. It contains truly information. Your website is very useful. Thanks for sharing
wood fence installation Gainesville
I really appreciate the topics that you post here in your blog. Thanks for sharing us some great information that is actually helpful. Good day!
Corals By Keppel Land
video on medini
Nice information, valuable and excellent design, as share good stuff with good ideas and concepts, lots of great information and inspiration, both of which I need, thanks to offer such a helpful information here.
fences pasadena tx
Appreciate this one, you are a great author. It’s really written in depth analysis and have urged visitors to look forward more on your writing.
cell phone spyware
cell phone spy software
When someone writes an article he/she keeps the plan of a user in his/her mind that how a user can understand it. Therefore that’s why this article is amazing. Thanks!
Diseño web Madrid
To be honest ,i do not have any opinion abou this poll showing that fifty-nine percent of voters would now oppose building high-speed rail.Your article gives detailed information about this poll. It is great. dvdmallonline | The Walking Dead Season 3 DVD Box Set
If the high speed rail project is not that necessary then i think it is best to listen to the majority of the citizens not to build it. Rather than spending billions of money on something less or unnecessary, the Governor must dedicate this money to something most useful and most beneficial to his community. Being a government officer is never an easy task but it will be easier when you listen and focus your attention to the people you have sworn to serve. If the governor and other officers have this in mind, then they will certainly be able carry out their best service to their people.
The Simpsons Tapped Out Hack
This blog will be a great source blog for those who wants to know about this topic. You have provided us with many essential articles that definitely put a new spin on a subject SEO packages
manual social bookmarking
buy quality backlink
pr5 backlink
Such a very useful article. Very interesting to read this article. I would like to thank you for the efforts you had made for writing this awesome article.
pagerank backlinks
I have no words to appreciate this post ….. I’m really impressed with this post …. the person who created this post was a big thank you man .. for sharing with us. buy quality backlink