This week the UK government announced an ”end to anti-car policies” reversing the guidance to local authorities to dissuade citizens from using their cars in favour of public transport. Charges for parking will be reined in, they promise.
It should be good news. The comically-named ”traffic calming” schemes put in place by the outgoing government were deeply unpopular. Still, we are getting used to taking our announcements from the new coalition government with a pinch of salt.
Before the election Housing Minister Grant Shapps backed demands from the Housebuilders’ Federation for a ‘right to build’. That might seem unnecessary, but in Britain the planning laws are so prohibitive that owning land extends no right to build upon it. Instead planning authorities extend permission to build where it meets the terms of the local plan.
The impact of Britain’s planning laws has always been a problem, but for the last thirteen years the ‘local plan’ has been hi-jacked by anti-growth campaigners from the Campaign to Protect Rural England, the Urban Taskforce and the massed ‘NIMBY’ campaigners of the Tory Shires.
The new local government minister Eric Pickles explained that the net effect of the planning system’s strangle hold on house building was that ”we’re at rock bottom”: ”1924 was the last time we built this little number of houses”. His Labour predecessor Nick Raynsford had ”done more damage than the Luftwaffe”, said Pickles, exaggerating a little, but making his point (Sunday Times, 12 September 2010).
So what about the changes? Grant Shapps’s published policy does include the words ”right to build” – but they are heavily hedged about:
”provided that [the new homes and buildings] conform to national environmental, architectural, economic and social standards, conform with the local plan, and pay a tariff that compensates the community for loss of amenity and costs of additional infrastructure’ (Open Source Planning, Page 3).
All of which sounds pretty much as bad as it was before. What right to build, you might ask? Indeed the words ‘right to build’ feature just once in the document, as quoted above, in the executive summary. There is a question mark, too, over who it is that has the right to build. ”Communities”, according to Shapps, and the government have the right, but just how these ”communities” are defined is not clear. More likely they will be the same planning authorities as before. In that case the only developers that get a look in will be the powerful and well-connected like Tesco or Barratt Homes – those who are in a position to meet the municipal fathers’ demands for baksheesh… or ”planning gain” as it is known in the UK.
Coalitions are new to Britain (apart from one shaky Liberal-Labour government in the seventies). But with neither David Cameron’s Conservative Party, nor the deeply demoralised Labour Party of Gordon Brown winning enough votes to command a majority in the House of Commons, Cameron had to turn to Nick Clegg’s minority Liberal Democrats.
This arrangement seems to suit Cameron. Cameron became leader on a pledge to lose the ”nasty party” image the Conservatives had after years of office in the 1980s. His method is a mirror image of Tony Blair’s repositioning of the Labour Party as a centre party by distancing it from its socialist roots. First we had a Labour government that was against socialism. Now we have a Conservative-led government that is shy about capitalism.
Sidelining the old-school Thatcherite, free market Tories in favour of his friends in the public relations, media and volunteer sector, Cameron seems obsessed with changing the party brand.Although this did not work in the election, the advantage of an alliance with the Liberal Democrats means that he can ditch whatever fundamentalist free market doctrines whenever convenient on the grounds that ”coalition government is compromise”.
The net effect is a government that keeps sounding as if it is going to do something decisive, but then doesn’t.
The greatest challenge has been the state of the public finances. Britain’s government debts are astonishing: one trillion pounds sterling, or 68.2 per cent of GDP. Since most of the debt was contracted under Labour’s watch, the coalition government has the moral high ground. The Labour coalition says that the cuts announced in the public sector put the recovery in danger because they are too far, too fast. They stand by ”counter-cyclical” spending, but Labour has little mainstream credibility in terms of the country’s finances.
For the left, though, balancing the capitalists’ books is hardly the issue. They are looking forward to a re-run of the campaign against the Thatcher public spending cuts of the 1980s. The protests and banners all seem to reinforce the idea that the government is indeed planning to rein in public spending, but it is not. As former Tory Minister John Redwood has pointed out, the planned cuts are not even cuts at all, but a limit on spending growth.
Cameron’s government had to sound tough on public spending, because the bond traders were in fear of Britain’s debt rating being marked down, and the wider impact of a loss of confidence. With both Greece and Ireland’s finances in trouble, the British government needed to promise stability.
But the same city traders are just as determined that the spending party should carry on, even if the volume is turned down to avoid scaring the neighbours. For years Britain’s ”private sector” has been dependent on extraordinary boosts of government cash. Under the outgoing government’s Private Finance Initiative, public institutions like hospitals and schools were allowed to raise funds by issuing their own bonds, debt that was not reckoned in the official accounts. Then Gordon Brown’s banking bailout found government buying up failing banks like Royal Bank of Scotland.
Despite their fawning support for austerity Britain’s City traders still expect to be looked after. The Bank of England’s emergency policy to meet the shortage of credit in the economy is called ”quantitative easing”. In practice it means that the government trades government bonds for the banks’ own toxic debts, while bond traders make money on the commission.
Even the one controversial cut in public spending turns out to be something more like a gift to the banks. The government says that they will let universities charge fees approaching the market rate, and that students will no longer be subsidised. Since those who made the decision all got to go to university for free, the backlash was understandable – the kind of rioting Saturnalia that Britons indulge in from time to time (“off with their heads!“ shouted student rioters when they chanced upon the Prince of Wales’s limousine and mobbed it, while running from the police).
To moderate the impact of the fees, though, the government has promised to expand the student loans scheme, where the State lends the money, and then recovers it later, through the tax system. For the banks, what could be more perfect? Here is a tranche of debt created overnight, guaranteed by a government that undertakes to recover it on their behalf: More of a subsidy to the City of London than a cut in government spending.
Though the Conservatives are thought of as ”Thatcher’s Children”, they behave much more like their ”New Labour” predecessors. The tough talk is for show.
Nowhere is this proto-New Labour approach clearer than on energy policy. Although Energy Minister Chris Huhne has acknowledged that Britain faces severe electricity shortages – he fails to ascribe the problem to its proximate cause, the failure to build enough coal-powered power stations.
Huhne’s solution, though, will make things worse. Not more coal-powered stations, but a government imposed increase on tariffs for fossil-fuel generated power, and a special allowance for renewable energy. Of course, renewable energy on any normal pricing system would be uneconomic. Britain’s latest windmills even had to be heated up to stop them freezing solid this winter. The net effect of Huhne’s proposal: no fix for the energy shortage, and more expensive electricity.
These policies have had disastrous, even lethal, results. According to the latest figures, excess winter deaths in the UK are in the region of 25 000, most of them the elderly, often hastened along by fuel poverty. With Huhne’s proposals, those numbers are set to increase, as electricity becomes something of a luxury to the poor.
At least in this area, the Tories are “conservative”. The tradition of the poor freezing to death in wintertime is being restored, and so too may be the old class system that allows the City to enrich itself as the expense of everyone else, including the taxpayers.
James Heartfield is the author of Let’s Build: Why we need five million new homes, a director of Audacity.org, and a member of the 250 New Towns Club.
Photo by Chris Devers
Comments
28 responses to “Coalition of the Unwilling”
People are comfortable. That’s the problem. That’s why the riots aren’t violent enough. But rest assured, once the winter deaths rise further people will demand what they deserve. Debt is such a huge problem for us all, while the government plays with it and throws it around like a toy. I’m starting to feel that I should have stayed in the US, people there are debt slaves too. They pay their creditors for life, as if getting new gadgets and clothes every month is so important. After I got my debt settlement finalized I felt that this financial freedom that I had means I can go back to the UK and start over. Hopefully the situation here will improve as the years pass. I’d hate to move away again.
I’m impressed, I must say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative madeira plastica and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. Your idea is hyundai hb20Soutstanding; the issue is sometallpexhing that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.
The proof is the Quang cao google buses and trains that converge on six large downtown areas in the United States, where 40 percent to 75 percent of commuters use transit. This is not because the people who work south of 59th Street in Manhattan, in Chicago’s Loop, or the downtown areas of Philadelphia, Washington, Boston or San Francisco have more effectively managed their guilt Quang cao tren google than the Austin commuter. It is rather because transit meets their needs. Commuters are rational. They take the mode of transport that best suits their needs. Transit’s market shares around the country (many of them miniscule) speak volumes about how well transit meets the needs of potential Quang cao google adwords customers.
This was a very cool article to read. I love this site and I cant wait to read more. What great information. G o o d a r t i e . I a v e n o d r e a d i . G d a r t i l h a e n j o y e d r e d n g . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .
. . . . .
The collapse of the housing market that triggered the Great Recession also has made Millennials sophisticated, knowledgeable consumers when making decisions about how and when to purchase a home. quang cao google Rather than thinking they should buy a home as soon as they get married or qualify for a mortgage, seventy percent of BHGRE’s respondents said the time to buy a house is when a person can “afford it and maintain their lifestyle
These findings suggest the current policies of the Federal Reserve and its Chairman, in thẻ bảo hành Ben Bernanke to keep interest rates low in order to stimulate this key part of the U.S. economy are right on target. If home builders and sellers can in thẻ nhựa tailor their offerings to these technologically sophisticated, family-oriented potential buyers, Millennials could well play an important role in reinvigorating the in thẻ vip nation’s housing market, further spurring the nation’s recovery from the Great Recession.
We know that getting a Vietnam visa is just a small task in preparing for your trip to Vietnam, but often consumes a lot of time and money. Because some people think that getting a Vietnam visa is very complicated, they decide to cancel their trip to Vietnam Vietnam visas We think that in these cases, people have not ben updated on Vietnam visa renewal achievements.
In Vietnam, visa-on-arrival started in 2003 and as of 2011 it is the predominant way tourists from Australia, North America and Europe come into Vietnam Visa to vietnam As Vietnam opens its economic and travelling door, the number of arrivals is on a sharp increase, every time it is counted. Following the rise in the number of international visitors, visa-on-arrival service has grown accordingly to meet the demand. Pioneering this trend vietnam visa online is the international renowned service. Please find below information to see if getting visa upon arrival at the airport good for you or not.
Vietnam visa on arrival is the cheapest way for you. With us, you only pay 20 USD or less, depending on the number of people in your group. And visa for vietnam you will receive authorization to receive visas at the airport. after getting the paper work, Vietnam visa application you will pay an additional fixed charge for each person is: 25 USD/person for single entry, 50 USD/person for multiple entries, and 100 USD/ person for 6 months multiple entries. And no more hidden charged.
For more information please email to vietnam visa on arrival Or hotline: +84.90.824.6047 Kevin Nguyen (Mr)
We know that getting a Vietnam visa is just a small task in preparing for your trip to Vietnam, but often consumes a lot of time and money. Because some people think that getting a Vietnam visa is very complicated, they decide to cancel their trip to Vietnam Vietnam visas We think that in these cases, people have not ben updated on Vietnam visa renewal achievements.
In Vietnam, visa-on-arrival started in 2003 and as of 2011 it is the predominant way tourists from Australia, North America and Europe come into Vietnam Visa to vietnam As Vietnam opens its economic and travelling door, the number of arrivals is on a sharp increase, every time it is counted. Following the rise in the number of international visitors, visa-on-arrival service has grown accordingly to meet the demand. Pioneering this trend vietnam visa online is the international renowned service. Please find below information to see if getting visa upon arrival at the airport good for you or not.
Vietnam visa on arrival is the cheapest way for you. With us, you only pay 20 USD or less, depending on the number of people in your group. And visa for vietnam you will receive authorization to receive visas at the airport. after getting the paper work, Vietnam visa application you will pay an additional fixed charge for each person is: 25 USD/person for single entry, 50 USD/person for multiple entries, and 100 USD/ person for 6 months multiple entries. And no more hidden charged.
For more information please email to vietnam visa on arrival Or hotline: +84.90.824.6047 Kevin Nguyen (Mr)
Useful information, because of the author. And disconcerting if you ask me now, but some of the usefulness and importance is enormous. stella and chewys
I carry with you the stuff to your door. They protect your car and the sofa when transporting. And your nerves. And your wallet … can be as simple as a sofa with my furniture transportation taxi in Berlin. Umzug Berlin
El Centro de tai lieu Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) espanyol,
bao cao thuc tap
dependent del Ministerio de Presidencia, realitzà un estudi específic per a Catalunya, fet gens comú al CIS,
luan van ngan hang
i que no s’ha tornat a repetir. El CIS ha estat denunciat repetidament i públicament de respondre als
de an mon hoc
interessos dels partits en el govern espanyol, bàsicament pel que fa a les enquestes d’intenció de vot.
I think it is an imaginary problem. We should concentrate on another. You can try blog new york
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.
http://sbobetbookie.com
I think that everything has been described in systematic manner so that reader could get maximum information and learn many things kamagraI completely trust you. I enjoy this post. It includes a great deal of useful information. I will setup my new idea made by this post. It gives in depth information
Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!
The Supplement Pros
I have bookmarked your blog, the articles are way better than other similar blogs.. thanks for a great blog!
How to get rid of a cold
máy in đa năngWe talked to a lot of people – máy nghe nhạc sony the legends who work here, our customers and partners.tủ lạnh toshiba We were delighted by what they said – we are a top agency delivering top creative solutions with superb technical solutions. We were very flattered and we also had the inspiration for our new name – tủ lạnh panasonic Solutions.
The website is looking bit flashy and it catches the visitors eyes. Design is pretty simple and a good user friendly interface.
Look for Quartier Restaurant Here
Booking your tickets: How to get cheap airline tickets and avoid the crowds Trying to book airline tickets is always stressful. There are so many things that need to be considered, especially the price. dubai vacation
I was looking at some of your posts on this website and I conceive this web site is really instructive! Keep putting up..
Symbolic Concierge
The website is looking bit flashy and it catches the visitors eyes. Design is pretty simple and a good user friendly interface.
Preschool in Porter Ranch CA
There is a question mark, too, over who it is that has the right to build. ”Communities”, according to Shapps, and the government have the right, but just how these ”communities” are defined is not clear. free cell phone spy software
cell phone spyware
That’s a good news. factory direct led grow lights from the best online led store – MSledstore.com
Things are very open and intensely clear explanation of issues. was serum korea Kaminomoto truly information. Your website is very beneficial.
There are definitely to many cars in big city. With good software they can be tempted down so there will be less cares in future. It’s very good to talk about this topic!
website maken software
Things are very open and intensely clear explanation of issues.
phen375 buy
Superbly written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a far better place..
https://www.rebelmouse.com/thedesiresystem
Hope you will not get tired on making posts as informative as this.
Root Canals Greenville SC