New Geography

Author: Robert Carr

  • The Robotics Census

    Immigration is a concern for countries around the world, not just the U.S. It’s that annoying tendency of humans to gravitate toward an area where they can survive as opposed to staying where they are barely surviving or worse.  Once there, of course, these workers are seen often as taking jobs, altering local cultures and in general upsetting lots of apple carts.  

    Here in the US, most fear concerns Spanish speakers but how about a whole other classification of immigrant workers whose impact may be the most insidious I of all: those that speak machine code, the basic language of computers.

    We’re talking about what we call robots, machines that can think and can do tasks for humans. In many instances, they can replace or reduce the human workers needed to do a job. Hence, they must be considered workers themselves.

    Unfortunately, they aren’t even counted in our national census, a clear instance of anti-machine racism. How are we to evaluate our true workforce? It’s left to the statistical department of the International Federation of Robotics (IFR) to keep track of them, where they are born and where they eventually work.

    The numbers IFR deals with are not cumulative numbers. The actual number of robots working at any one time is a function of their lifespan which is about that of a dog:  about 12-15 years, usually. But since we’ve only had robots since the late sixties, that doesn’t mean much. Improvements that increase lifespan are always being made.

    These new workers come in various categories including personal service robots, professional service robots and industrial robots. Like their human counterparts, robot workers come with varying levels of skill and intelligence.

    A personal service robot can do anything from vacuum cleaning to lawn-mowing to window cleaning. Recognize those jobs? They used to be done by low-skilled workers and kids looking to make a buck around their neighborhood. Not anymore. This constitutes the fastest growing segment of robotics, with about 15 million more of these are due to be released into the wild by 2014.

    The professional service robot can handle medical applications, search and rescue, bomb disposal, and in increasing numbers, military jobs like aerial surveillance: drones. The fastest growing jobs of this segment are milking robots – the days of stools and pails are over – and defense applications.  

    And therein lies the paradox of the robot worker. You can’t really complain about fewer jobs for window washers while praising the selfless robots willing to die for us.

    How then are we to think about those now ubiquitous automated checkout stands in your local CVS which management wants to make you use to check out your own purchases — as if it’s fun? While ignoring that each of those stations used to be a human’s job. Almost makes you want to resolve to patronize only human checkers, that is, if you can find one!

    Some of the smartest of the new immigrant workers are the industrial robots. Industrial robots generally have appendages and they work overwhelmingly in the automobile and the electronics industry. Most of them have found work of late in the Republic of Korea, China and the ASEAN countries.  The IFR tells us there are more than 1,300,000 in service.

    Don’t let that apparently low number fool you. You have to understand that one industrial robot can be a factory. All it takes to turn that one robot into an army is new software. They are quick learners. One day it’s a welder, the next it’s an electrician. They are designed to work 24 hours straight, with no lunch and no breaks, doing the same operation over and over with the utmost precision.

    Mind-numbing consistency, that’s the ticket. Robots don’t make things better than people do. They simply make things the same, forever. Work turned out on Friday is the same as that turned out on Monday. Moreover, they have other advantages. A robot-populated factory filmed for a documentary in Japan needed to import lighting. The actual factory needed none. Such factories may also dispense with HVAC systems, potted plants and lavatories.  You can hear the heavy breathing among the bean-counters!

    If the hairs on the back of your neck haven’t perked up by now, we can add a chilling coda. Who do you think is turning out all these robots? That’s right, robots! Under the watchful eyes of their control humans as of now, but later, who knows?

    To measure the impact of these immigrants on local populations, the IFR uses a metric called Robot Density. Simply it is the number of multipurpose industrial robots per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing industry whether automotive, electronic or generally. The IFR found the worldwide average industrial robot density of the 45 countries it surveys is about 50 robots. The bottom 21 countries have less than a 20-robot density.

    However, in 2010, the most automated countries were Japan, Republic of Korea, and Germany with densities of 306, 287 and 253 respectively. The fact that all these countries have low human birthrates makes you think a bit.

    If you take just the auto industry in Japan and Germany the densities rise to 1,436 and 1,130. Number three in the auto industry by the way is Italy with 1,229.

    What about the good ol’ USA? In 2010, 1,112 industrial robots worked in the auto industry for every 10,000 human workers. We also tend to have more babies.

    You see what’s happening here? At 1000, the number of robots equals one-tenth of the (human) workforce.

    Our future arch enemy in the auto industry, China, increased their density from a paltry 2006 level of 37 to a paltry 105 in 2010, though with their population numbers and still relatively low wages they could probably put autos together Henry Ford style and still make money.  

    The undeniable fact is robots are taking over the auto industry in the same way the Swiss captured the watchmaking industry just four hundred years ago. Remember? The other big robot user, the electronics industry, can boast similar numbers and similar robotic domination.

    Are robots to blame for the recent recession and its attendant job losses? Well, you can rest easy knowing that robots suffered during the last few years, too. Job placements, in fact, were down 47% to the lowest level reported since 1994.

    But by 2010, the auto and electronics industries had begun their recovery and robot placements recovered by 50%. In monetary terms this uptick was worth $5.7 billion to robot manufacturers. Substantial, but still not up to 2008 levels. Worldwide worth of the robot worker market, notes IFR, now totals some $18 Billion annually.

    Noted science fiction writer Isaac Asimov once composed a set of laws to restrain the behavior of robots and to make them more acceptable to society. The original set has been refined and added to over the years by others and by Asimov, himself. They are:

    1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
    2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
    3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

    And, there is a fourth known as the “zeroth” law, to precede the others:

    0.  A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.

    Robots currently are not smart enough to read, understand or follow these laws. In the case of milking robots that isn’t a problem, but with drones, it might be. Humans have to control them. When things are going well, these multi-talented helpers are more than welcomed and appreciated. After all, nobody really wants handmade automobiles. If they’re all different, how would you get parts for them? And electronics built by Chinese ladies with soldering irons is not a business model that inspires confidence.

    The fact is, for good and/or evil robots are now firmly entrenched in our industrial culture. And more are on the way. In the next four years, robot immigration , according to IFR, will increase by about 6% per year on average: about 6% in the Americas, about 7% in Asia/Australia, and about 4% in Europe.

    Whether they are harming humanity depends on your perspective. They are taking jobs in some places and they are creating jobs in others. Perhaps the most we can hope for is a tempering of the automation frenzy while we humans prepare for the onslaught. We’re going to need more education and training to live with and control our new compatriots. For the near future, it may be wise to keep track of the new census, the combined census, because that’s the way it’s going to be from now on. Us and them.

    So far, in some countries,  one in ten industrial workers has their more capable, robotic counterpart.    Every technological advance has consequences, winners and losers; and it’s disingenuous to pretend they don’t.

    Robert Carr, as far as we know, is human and writes occasionally on technology. He is based in Los Angeles.

    Photo by BigStockPhoto.com.

  • Don’t Touch That Dial!

    If this were the 1950s, a buzz would be going through the African American community right about now because, come Tuesday, another small milestone would be reached in our progression from involuntary to voluntary servitude. The milestone? A black man is going to appear on television.

    Sightings of black people on the tube back then were rare. Hence, there was always some excitement when it occurred. You had Beulah and Amos and Andy on regularly – singer Hazel Scott once had her own show as did singer Billy Daniels. Nat King Cole had a very popular show for a while but lack of national sponsorship and the fact that they didn’t give him any money to pay his guests forced him to fold it. But you’ll notice these people were all entertainers. Real black people, those who couldn’t sing, dance, play an instrument or tell jokes, were never seen on television.

    Just as importantly, they were never seen in TV commercials. It seemed at the time we had a surfeit of bumbling white husbands and clueless white wives. But somehow sponsors were reluctant to associate their products with similarly deficient blacks.

    Blacks were also seldom seen in television dramas. Whole towns, let alone neighborhoods, were portrayed as devoid of dark-skinned residents. No one had a black friend in those towns. Workmen, sure. Servants, yes. But not friends.

    Simply put, black people were systematically and summarily excluded from the popular culture. And not just from television. It was radio too, where small skirmishes were fought over whose version of “I’m Walkin’” was to be played: Ricky Nelson’s or Fats Domino’s. Naturally, Ricky usually won. It was also true in movies where Super Sidney and Calypso Harry were our only stars. And even they better watch their step lest they offend with too strident a tone or too familiar a manner. And, of course, the newspapers simply did not cover the black community at all unless to report crime statistics.

    To black children of the time, it meant that except for the people in their immediate geographical area, other blacks did not exist. They could turn on the television and enter a world where they saw no one who looked like them. No one they could look up to; no black role models save the Kingfish.

    This situation gradually changed over time. As we moved into the Sixties, the days of “Civil Rights,” blacks emerged out of their real and virtual ghettos. The panoply of blacks expanded to include new types: protesters, militants and eventually, that curious group known as “tokens.” Those were black people used to dress a set like a table or lamp. Nothing was really expected of them but to stand there and be seen – to prove someone knew about them. The “token” was always a “good” black person, meant to represent and asked to speak for all black people. They were not angry like militant H. “Rap” Brown, or civil rights protesters like that troublesome Martin Luther King, Jr.

    Their pop culture numbers ranged from one-twelfth of the Dirty Dozen to a full 30% of the Mod Squad. These were fully-integrated, completely-assimilated, likeable, sympathetic blacks you could work with and invite to your home for dinner. What more could black people want?

    As it turned out, quite a bit more. Black people wanted to be part of things they had helped create. They wanted to be included in a country where inclusion was guaranteed by the Constitution. And, later, as the Eighties dawned in America, they also wanted to be on MTV.

    The pathways to those goals generally excluded politics. Politicians could never be counted on to improve our lot. It became a kind of game to parse the words of the white candidates to see how much they were on our side. There was always just enough there to get the black vote but not enough to turn away the still racially-averse white vote. And after they were elected, all the courtship promises were forgotten. After all, shouldn’t our Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall be enough? Shouldn’t our UN Ambassador Ralph Bunche suffice for a while? Didn’t Adam Clayton Powell prove you couldn’t trust these people with real political power – and power over white people?

    So the preferred pathway lay elsewhere. Sports and entertainment became the ticket. The pop culture route was most efficient because entry couldn’t be denied. A 400-hitter or hundred-yard rusher was a crowd pleaser, white or black, and therefore an economic winner too. Singers, composers and musicians could set a toe tapping before the race of the performer was noticed. Albums of music could be distributed with no photos of the artists to offend the racially biased.

    In time, the economics of black consumerism was enough to move product – considerable product. By the Seventies, the purveyors of what became known as “blaxploitation” movies figured out that filling a movie cast with black faces might lead to filling movie theaters with black faces. And, once it was realized that blacks bought the same products and services that whites did, even television commercials began to feature one or two in the same inane scripts that once were reserved for whites. Later, new generations of whites weren’t as choosy about who made the music they liked. Thus the MTV barrier was broken. What more could black people want?

    And now, politics has been put back on the front burner. The playing field has changed. Not completely, of course. Regardless of what you hear, we are still far from being a post-racial society, not for another couple of generations, at least.

    But now there is a widening array of black images out there. There is something at last for young black people to shoot for and be proud of. There is another way to go besides being running back or gangsta rapper. There is being part of the making of the future – and not only for ourselves. There is being included in the calculation. There is greater belief in the sincerity of the politician. There is more balance in the popular culture.

    Is that the “more” that blacks wanted? Not really. The truth is blacks never wanted “more” in the first place. All we really wanted was the same.

    So when Tuesday rolls around, that buzz will still permeate the black community. Old, young, and in-between we will all gather around our LCDs, some of us wistful, some of us hopeful, to celebrate our past and watch history being made – as a black man appears on television.

    Bob Carr is a free-lance writer, editor and webmaster living in Los Angeles. He has been an Associate Editor and Senior Staff Writer for Playboy magazine and was born in Charleston, South Carolina shortly after VJ Day.