Tag: Austin

  • Moving from Travis County (Austin) to Williamson County

    In an article entitled, “The People Moving to Austin and ‘Ruining It’ are from Texas,” the Austinist notes that more people are moving to Austin from neighboring Williamson County than from Los Angeles County.

    The article has the potential to mislead in two ways.

    The lesser of the problems is that it confuses Austin with Travis County. The cited data is for Travis County, not the city of Austin. The source of the data, the American Community Survey does not report on municipal migration. (Austin is most of Travis County’s population, but itself has sections in Williamson and Hayes counties).

    The bigger problem is that the article tells only half the story. Yes, 10,500 people moved from Williamson to Travis over the 2006-2010 period, but 14,200 moved from Travis to Williamson. Thus, there was a net outflow of 3,700 people from Travis to Williamson. Meanwhile, there was a net gain of residents in Travis County from Los Angeles County of approximately 800.

    Thus, while there is net migration from Los Angeles County to Travis County, the net migration from Travis County to Williamson County is 4.5 times as large.

  • City of Austin Approves Big Greenfield Development

    Despite its smart growth policies, the city of Austin has approved a new development on the urban fringe that will include new detached housing starting at $115,000.

    Austin is the third fastest growing metropolitan area with more than 1,000,000 residents in the United States, following Raleigh, North Carolina and Las Vegas. The city of Austin accounted for 53% (672,000) of the metropolitan area’s 1.27 million population in 2000, but has seen more than 70% of the growth since that time go to the suburbs. Now the metropolitan area has 1.65 million people, and the city has 785,000.

    The Austin metropolitan area managed to experience only modest house price increases during the housing bubble, though other metropolitan areas in Texas (Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio) did even better (see the Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey). Austin’s Median Multiple (median house price divided by median household income) peaked at 3.3, slightly above the historic maximum norm of 3.0. Like other Texas markets, there has been little price decline during the housing bust, illustrating the lower level of price volatility and speculation identified by Glaeser and Gyourko with less restrictive land use regulation. This stability has helped Texas weather the Great Recession better than its principal competition, the more intensely regulated states of California and Florida.

    The city of Austin, however, is rare in Texas for generally favoring the more restrictive (smart growth) land use policy devices that have been associated with the extreme house price escalation in California, Florida, Portland, and many other metropolitan areas. The city’s freedom, however, to implement the most draconian policies and drive house prices up is severely limited by far less restrictive land use policies in the balance of its home county (Travis), neighboring Williamson County (usually among the fastest growing in the nation), Hayes County and the other counties in the metropolitan area.

    Austin is competing. This is illustrated by the recent Austin city council action to approve a new “mega” development on the urban area’s eastern fringe that could eventually add 5,000 new houses, town houses and apartments. The first phase will be 350 detached houses that the developer indicates will be priced from $115,000 to $120,000 (including land), an amount less than a building lot San Diego, Los Angeles, Vancouver and Australia.

    By comparison with other developments in the Austin area, however, these houses may be expensive. One home builder is currently advertising new detached houses, only 7 miles from downtown Austin for $90,000. These are not the least expensive in Texas. Detached houses in Houston are being advertised for $79,000.

    A case study in the 3rd Annual Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey showed that the median income Austin household could purchase the median priced house for 11 years less income than in Perth, Australia (this includes mortgage interest). While both Austin and Perth have been growing rapidly, Austin’s faster growth is evidence of stronger demand, which, all things being equal, would have been expected to drive house prices up more than in Perth. But, with more restrictive land use regulation, all things are never equal.

  • U-Haul Prices as Migration Indicator

    Austin fared very well on this year’s Best Cities Rankings, and here’s another interesting indicator of the difference in migration between Austin and San Francisco:

    “When comparing California with Texas, U-Haul says it all. To rent a 26-foot truck oneway from San Francisco to Austin, the charge is $3,236, and yet the one-way charge for that same truck from Austin to San Francisco is just $399. Clearly what is happening is that far more people want to move from San Francisco to Austin than vice versa, so U-Haul has to pay its own employees to drive the empty trucks back from Texas.”

    This anecdote comes from a report comparing business environments in Texas to California.

    Here’s a table of the latest domestic migration numbers from US Census for all metropolitan areas of more than 1.5 million total population (rate numbers are per 1,000 population):

    NAME
    Population, 2008
    Net Domesitc Migration Rate, 2008
    Ave. Net Domesic Mig Rate, 2001-2008
    New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 19,006,798 -7.6 -12.0
    Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 12,872,808 -9.0 -12.2
    Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 9,569,624 -4.4 -6.8
    Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 6,300,006 7.0 5.7
    Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 5,838,471 -3.8 -2.3
    Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 5,728,143 6.6 4.5
    Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 5,414,772 -8.7 -5.1
    Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 5,376,285 8.2 10.2
    Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 5,358,130 -3.4 -2.9
    Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 4,522,858 -1.8 -7.1
    Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 4,425,110 -13.9 -9.1
    Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 4,281,899 12.3 17.9
    San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 4,274,531 1.3 -10.5
    Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 4,115,871 -1.9 16.1
    Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 3,344,813 3.6 0.9
    Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 3,229,878 -1.1 -1.0
    San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 3,001,072 0.1 -4.8
    St. Louis, MO-IL 2,816,710 -2.0 -1.8
    Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 2,733,761 2.4 12.9
    Baltimore-Towson, MD 2,667,117 -4.6 -1.6
    Denver-Aurora, CO /1 2,506,626 7.3 1.8
    Pittsburgh, PA 2,351,192 -1.0 -2.9
    Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 2,207,462 8.3 6.2
    Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 2,155,137 -1.7 -1.2
    Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville, CA 2,109,832 2.2 8.7
    Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 2,088,291 -7.1 -7.5
    Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 2,054,574 1.6 15.9
    San Antonio, TX 2,031,445 11.5 10.4
    Kansas City, MO-KS 2,002,047 0.7 1.5
    Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 1,865,746 7.9 23.7
    San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 1,819,198 -1.5 -16.4
    Columbus, OH 1,773,120 1.4 1.8
    Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 1,715,459 4.0 4.8
    Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 1,701,799 20.9 18.2
    Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 1,658,292 -9.4 -0.6
    Austin-Round Rock, TX 1,652,602 22.0 17.2
    Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 1,596,611 -6.6 -3.7
    Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 1,550,733 10.9 9.6
    Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 1,549,308 -4.2 -5.9