Tag: Best Cities 2012

  • Seattle Is Leading An American Manufacturing Revival – Top Manufacturing Growth Regions

    In this still tepid recovery, the biggest feel-good story has been the resurgence of American manufacturing. As industrial production has fallen in Europe and growth has slowed in China, U.S. factories have continued an expansion that has stretched on for over 33 months. In April, manufacturing growth was the strongest in 10 months.

    There are a number of reasons for this revival. Rising wages in China – up from roughly one-third U.S. levels to half that in a decade — and problems associated with protection of trademarks and other issues have led many U.S. executives to look back home. Some 22% of U.S. product manufacturers surveyed by MFGWatch reported moving some production back to America in the fourth quarter of 2011, and one in three said they were studying the proposition.

    Certainly how long this expansion can last is an open question, particularly given weakness in Europe and the slowdown in formerly fast-growing developing countries. But one thing is clear: the industrial resurgence is reshaping the economic and employment map in often unexpected ways.

    Now rather than being pulled down by manufacturing, our Best Cities For Jobs survey, conducted by Pepperdine University’s Michael Shires, found that many industrial regions are benefiting from their prowess.

    From 2010 through March, manufacturers added 470,000 jobs and enjoyed a rate of job growth 10% faster than the rest of the private economy. In the past many areas suffered from having too many industrial workers. Now it looks like we will have too few skilled ones, even in hard-hit sectors like the auto industry. In 2011 there were 50,000 unfilled U.S. job openings in industrial engineering, welding, and computer-controlled machine tool operating, according to the forecasting firm EMSI. If the revival continues, this shortage could worsen.

    To determine the cities that are leading the manufacturing revival, we assessed manufacturing employment growth in the 65 largest metropolitan statistical areas. Rankings are based on recent growth trends, as well as job growth over the past five and 10 years, and the MSAs’ momentum (see the bottom of this piece for the full rankings list).

    Where Technology Meets Manufacturing

    In an era of excitement over the Internet, it is often forgotten that a majority of the country’s scientists and engineers work for manufacturers, and that industrial companies account for 68% of business R&D spending, which in turn accounts for about 70% of total R&D spending.

    Nowhere is this linkage between technology and industry more evident than in the Seattle-Bellevue-Everett area, which ranks first on our list of the metropolitan areas leading the manufacturing revival. Over the past year the region was No. 2 in the nation in manufacturing growth, with employment expanding 7.9%. The aerospace sector, led by Boeing, accounted for roughly half this expansion.

    The growth in aerospace and high-tech employment creates precisely the kinds of high-wage jobs, including for blue-collar workers, that are lacking in many parts of the country. In 2010 the average factory wage in the area was $64,925, up 9% from 2007. Most critically, manufacturing activity drives growth in other sectors of the economy. About one in six of all private-sector jobs depend on the manufacturing sector, and every dollar of sales of manufactured products generates $1.40 in output from other sectors, the highest of any industry.

    As manufacturing employment overall has dropped, the percentage of higher-wage, skilled industrial jobs has been climbing over the last decades, particularly in high-technology related fields Overall, according to EMSI data, the average American factory worker earned $73,000 in 2011, $20,000 more than the average job.

    Seattle is not alone in creating high-tech-oriented industrial jobs. Over the past two years Salt Lake City, Utah, which ranks third on our list, has seen significant growth in both electronics and aerospace employment, including a new Northrop Grumman facility. Firms connected to the medical device industry such as Biomerics are also expanding in the area.

    Manufacturing is also rebounding in Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, Texas, which ranks eighth on our list and No. 1 on our overall list of Best Big Cities For Jobs. Last year industrial employment in the Texas state capital area jumped 5%. Semiconductor firms are a big force, employing over 10,000 workers. Although more known for its high-tech electronics, Austin has also enjoyed an expansion in automobile-related employment as well as medical devices.

    Energy Capitals

    The largest grouping of manufacturing stars have emerged from the Texas-Oklahoma energy belt. With the shale drilling boom unlocking ample supplies of natural gas and lowering prices, petrochemical companies have undertaken major expansions. The rise in drilling and exploration has also sparked greater demand for industrial products such as pipes, drill rigs and other machinery. No surprise that the biggest backers of shale gas exploration are prominent CEOs of industrial firms. A recent study by PwC suggests that shale gas could lead to the development of 1 million industrial jobs.

    The shale drilling revolution is making an impact across the country, in places like North Dakota and Youngstown, Ohio, but the epicenter of this boom remains firmly in the oil patch. The Thunder you hear in Oklahoma City is not just on the basketball court — energy growth has propelled a 1,500 person jump in manufacturing employment, a 6.1% increase, with another 1,000 new jobs expected this year. Oklahoma City ranks second on our list.

    Other energy capitals are also thriving on the industrial front, including Houston (fourth place), San Antonio (seventh) and Ft. Worth-Arlington (ninth). Although energy is the main driver, manufacturing has been on the rise in a broad array of areas, including aerospace, biomedical and food processing. The surging export economy — Texas is easily the nation’s number one exporter — has further bolstered this growth.

    Rustbelt Rebounders

    The high-tech and energy economies may be fast-breaking in terms of industrial growth, but manufacturing’s comeback has put some new bounce in the step of many long forlorn parts of the nation’s “rustbelt.” Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, Mich., epitomizes this trend. Unlike Detroit, which has suffered mass disinvestment, this more suburban area a half hour drive away has become the epicenter of a new, more tech-oriented auto industry.

    The Warren-Troy area’s rich concentration of skilled tradespeople and industrial engineers has been described as America’s “automation alley.” It continues to attract high-industrial firms from abroad such as Brose, a German car parts manufacturer, which has recently announced a $60 million investment in the area. Even housing is on the rebound, with rents rising at the fourth highest clip in the country, just behind such standouts as San Francisco and Miami.

    Nor is the Midwest manufacturing rebound limited to Michigan. Over the past year sixth-ranked Cincinnati enjoyed 5.4% growth in industrial employment. Manufacturing growth was also strong in Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wisc., a center for the production of machine tools and other precision equipment that ranks 10th on our list.

    Who’s Falling Behind

    Of course not all regions have benefited from the industrial resurgence. For example, the nation’s largest industrial area, Los Angeles, ranks a miserable 49th. The area lost some 20% of its industrial jobs since 2006, and the losses continued over the past year. This goes a long way to explain the area’s continued underperformance before, during and, now, in the early days of recovery from the financial crisis.

    Some other large regions did even worse, including such one-time industrial powerhouses as Philadelphia (55th) and New York (59th). Some may argue that these, and other areas, which have been losing manufacturing jobs for decades, no longer need to engage in the messy business of making stuff. But that long fashionable way thinking may be outdated itself, as seen by the improving fortunes of our industrial top 10.

    Top Large Regions for Manufacturing Growth

    Rank Area 2012 Weighted INDEX 2011 Manuf. Employment (000s)
    1 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan Division 81.2 164.3
    2 Oklahoma City, OK 74.8 33.6
    3 Salt Lake City, UT 74.7 55.1
    4 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 74.6 229.8
    5 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metropolitan Division 74.4 135.3
    6 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 71.7 109.3
    7 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 70.3 46.3
    8 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 69.3 50.9
    9 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan Division 68.3 89.1
    10 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 67.9 118.5
    11 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 67.3 157.9
    12 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 65.8 52.3
    13 Kansas City, MO 65.2 40.5
    14 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 64.7 31.8
    15 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 63.5 178.7
    16 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Metro. Division 63.1 27.1
    17 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 62.8 63.3
    18 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 61.7 121.2
    19 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 61.1 110.0
    20 Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA Metropolitan Division 60.0 154.9
    21 Columbus, OH 58.0 65.2
    22 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 57.4 67.9
    23 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA NECTA Division 56.9 94.6
    24 Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan Division 55.8 72.9
    25 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 55.2 147.9
    26 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL Metropolitan Division 54.4 322.4
    27 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 54.1 57.0
    28 Pittsburgh, PA 53.3 87.8
    29 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 52.8 92.0
    30 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan Division 52.8 167.4
    31 St. Louis, MO-IL 52.8 111.4
    32 Rochester, NY 51.7 61.1
    33 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 51.3 52.0
    34 Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO 51.0 61.2
    35 Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan Division 50.4 72.8
    36 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 48.8 51.8
    37 San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA Metropolitan Division 47.4 36.8
    38 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 45.8 31.3
    39 Northern Virginia, VA 43.7 23.0
    40 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 43.4 37.8
    41 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 43.3 60.0
    42 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 42.9 44.3
    43 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 42.9 112.3
    44 Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Division 42.3 78.2
    45 Raleigh-Cary, NC 41.5 27.3
    46 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 39.7 35.2
    47 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 38.8 63.5
    48 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 38.3 62.8
    49 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan Division 38.2 359.7
    50 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 37.9 80.8
    51 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 37.1 19.7
    52 Newark-Union, NJ-PA Metropolitan Division 35.2 68.8
    53 Jacksonville, FL 34.5 26.7
    54 Bethesda-Rockville-Frederick, MD Metropolitan Division 34.1 16.1
    55 Philadelphia City, PA 33.3 23.1
    56 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach, FL Metropolitan Division 32.4 15.0
    57 Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville, CA 31.9 32.5
    58 New York City, NY 30.9 73.3
    59 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metropolitan Division 28.9 35.4
    60 Camden, NJ Metropolitan Division 27.5 36.2
    61 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro. Division 27.1 33.6
    62 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 25.5 86.6
    63 Putnam-Rockland-Westchester, NY 24.8 24.6
    64 Edison-New Brunswick, NJ Metropolitan Division 24.3 58.2
    65 Richmond, VA 18.7 30.9

    The index is calculated using the same methodology as our Best Cities for Job Growth, but using only manufacturing employment in each region.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com and is a distinguished presidential fellow in urban futures at Chapman University, and contributing editor to the City Journal in New York. He is author of The City: A Global History. His newest book is The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050, released in February, 2010.

    Seattle waterfront photo by BigStockPhoto.com.

  • Small Cities Are Becoming a New Engine Of Economic Growth

    The conventional wisdom is that the world’s largest cities are going to be the primary drivers of economic growth and innovation. Even slums, according to a fawning article in National Geographic, represent “examples of urban vitality, not blight.” In America, it is commonly maintained by pundits that “megaregions” anchored by dense urban cores will dominate the future.

    Such conceits are, not surprisingly, popular among big city developers and the media in places like New York, which command the national debate by blaring the biggest horn. However, a less fevered analysis of recent trends suggests a very different reality: When it comes to growth, economic and demographic, opportunity increasingly is to be found in smaller, and often remote, places.

    Read about how we selected the 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    This year’s edition of Forbes’ Best Cities For Jobs survey, compiled with Pepperdine University’s Michael Shires, found that small and midsized metropolitan areas, with populations of 1 million or less, accounted for 27 of the 30 urban regions in the country that are adding jobs at the fastest rate. The three largest metropolitan statistical areas that made the top 30 — Austin, Houston and Salt Lake City — are themselves highly dispersed with sprawling employment sheds.

    Rather than the products of “smart growth” and intense densification, almost all of the fastest-growing metropolitan areas — including larger ones like Silicon Valley and Raleigh — tend to be dominated by suburban-style, single-family homes and utterly dependent on the greatest scourge of the urbanist creed: the private car. But many of the smaller areas also punch above their weight in myriad ways, spanning a host of industries.

    Among the 398 MSAs we ranked for the list, energy towns dominate the top of the table:  Odessa, Texas (100,000), took first place; followed by Midland, Texas (population: 111,000), in second place; Lafayette, La. (fourth, 114,000); Corpus Christi, Texas (sixth, 287,000); San Angelo, Texas (seventh, 92,000); Casper, Wyo. (10th, 54,000); and Bismarck, N.D. (21st, 61,000). These cities’ economies have expanded steadily over the last few years, beneficiaries of a great boom in fossil fuels that, unless derailed by regulators, will continue for the foreseeable future.

    But some of the other best cities for jobs make their livings in different ways, such as No. 12 Glens Falls, N.Y., riding growth in business services and tourism; and No. 15 Columbia, Mo., which is primarily a college and government town. Several smaller communities have bounced back strongly with the recovery of manufacturing, including No. 3 Columbus Ind., No. 11 Williamsport, Pa., and No. 19 Holland-Grand Haven, Mich.

    This shift in opportunity also parallels some compelling demographic trends. In the 1990s, the rate of population growth of areas over 1 million and those below was essentially similar. In contrast, in the subsequent decade, urban areas with fewer than a million people expanded by 15%, compared to barely 9% for larger urban areas, notes demographer Wendell Cox. In those 10 years, areas with fewer than a million people accounted for more than 60% of urban growth. Essentially more Americans are now moving to smaller regions than to larger ones.

    We  see is a very different reality than that often promoted by big city boosters. Large, dense urban regions clearly possess some great advantages: hub airports, big labor markets, concentrations of hospitals, schools, cultural amenities and specific industrial expertise. Yet despite these advantages, they still lag in the job creation race to unheralded, smaller communities.

    Why are the stronger smaller cities growing faster than most larger ones? The keys may lie in many mundane factors that are often too prosaic for urban theorists. They include things such as strong community institutions like churches and shorter commutes than can be had in New York, L.A., Boston or the Bay Area (except for those willing to pay sky-high prices to live in a box near downtown). Young families might be attracted to better schools in some areas — notably the Great Plains — and the access to natural amenities common in many of these smaller communities.

    Perhaps another underappreciated factor is Americans’ overwhelming preference for a single-family home, particularly young families. A recent survey from the National Association of Realtors found that 80 percent preferred a detached, single-family home; only a small sliver, roughly 7 percent, wanted to live in a dense urban area “close to it all.” Some 87 percent expressed a strong desire for greater privacy, something that generally comes with lower-density housing.

    This trend towards smaller communities — unthinkable among big city planners and urban land speculators — is likely to continue for several reasons. For one thing, new telecommunications technology serves to even the playing field for companies in smaller cities. You can now operate a sophisticated global business from Fargo, N.D., or Shreveport, La., in ways inconceivable a decade or two ago.

    Another key element is the predilections of two key expanding demographic groups: boomers and their offspring, the millennials. Aging boomers are not, in large part, hankering for dense city life, as is often asserted. If anything, if they choose to move, they tend toward less dense and even rural areas. Young families and many better-educated workers also seem to be moving generally to less dense and affordable places.

    Perhaps even more surprising, this tendency toward decentralization can be seen around the world: much of the new growth is in smaller cities, with India as a prime example. A recent McKinsey study found that “middle-weight” cities, many of them well under a million, have already started taking a larger percentage of the world’s urban growth.

    McKinsey suggests that the notion that megacities will dominate the urban future constitutes “a common misconception.” Instead surging smaller cities will constitute well over half of the world’s urban growth, gaining ever more share from the megacities over time. This is particularly true in the U.S. which constitutes the epicenter for the new smaller city economy. Of the world’s 600 “middleweight” cities, the U.S. is home to 257. Together they generate 70% of U.S. GDP.

    What does this mean for investors, companies and individuals in the coming decades? For one thing, Wall Street, which tends to obsess over a handful of high-cost, dense, urban markets, may seek out new opportunities in faster-growing smaller cities. Prices tend to be lower and competition for prime space less intense, and the demographic wind is at their backs. Companies looking to expand may find not only a welcome mat from the locals, but also an expanding workforce in these generally more affordable places.

    Finally, particularly for the next generation, the shift to smaller cities provides a whole realm of new options for sinking roots, starting business or a family and owning a home. Smaller city life certainly does not appeal to everyone, or every business, but their growing dynamism provides a welcome option for people who want to get a leg up in the next decade.

    Read about how we selected the 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    This piece originally appeared in Forbes.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com and is a distinguished presidential fellow in urban futures at Chapman University, and contributing editor to the City Journal in New York. He is author of The City: A Global History. His newest book is The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050, released in February, 2010.

    Photo: Glens Falls, NY

  • The Best Cities for Jobs 2012

    Throughout the brutal recession, one metropolitan area floated serenely above the carnage: Washington, D.C.  Buoyed by government spending, the local economy expanded 17% from 2007 to 2012. But for the first time in four years, the capital region has fallen out of the top 15 big cities in our annual survey of the best places for jobs, dropping to 16th place from fifth last year.

    It’s a symptom of a significant and welcome shift in the weak U.S. economic recovery:  employment growth has moved away from the public sector to private businesses. In 2011, for the first time since before the recession, growth in private-sector employment outstripped the public sector. More than half (231) of the 398 metro areas we surveyed for our annual study of employment trends registered declines in government jobs, with public-sector employment dropping 0.9 percent overall. Meanwhile, private-sector employment expanded 1.4 percent.

    Read about how we selected the 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Instead of government, the big drivers of growth now appear to be three basic sectors: energy, technology and, most welcome all, manufacturing. Energy-rich Texas cities dominate our list — the state has added some 200,000 generally high-paying oil and gas jobs over the past decade — but Texas is also leading in industrial job growth, technology and services. In first place in our ranking of the 65 largest metropolitan areas is Austin, which has logged strong growth in manufacturing,  technology-related employment and business services. Houston places second, Ft. Worth fourth, and Dallas-Plano-Irving sixth. Another energy capital, Oklahoma City, ranks 10th, while resurgent New Orleans-Metairie places 13th among the largest metro areas.

    To determine the best cities for jobs, we ranked all 398 current metropolitan statistical areas based on employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics covering November 2000 through January 2012. Rankings are based on recent growth trends, mid-term growth, long-term growth and the region’s momentum. (Here is a detailed description of our methodology.) We also broke down rankings by size — small, medium and large — since regional economies differ markedly due to their scale.

    The strong growth of the energy sector, and Texas, is even more evident in our overall ranking, which includes many small and medium-sized metropolitan areas. The top 10 fastest growers overall include such energy-centric places as No. 1 Odessa, Texas; second-place Midland, Texas;  Lafayette, La. (fourth place); Corpus Christi, Texas (sixth), San Angelo, Texas (seventh); and Casper, Wyo. (10th).

    The shift from public to private can be seen in the falling rankings of many of the most government-dependent economies. Outside of Washington, D.C. (where federal employment actually has continued to grow), Bethesda-Rockville-Frederick, Md., took an even more dramatic tumble in our big city table,  dropping 34 places to No. 46.There were sizable relative declines in the rankings of many state capitals such as Springfield, Ill. and Madison, Wisc. College towns, which had previously done well in the face of the recession, have also moved sharply lower in our rankings, due to a combination of state budget cuts and better performance elsewhere. College Station, Texas, plummeted from fourth last year on our overall list to 167th; Fairbanks, Alaska, slid from 15th place to 165th, Corvallis, Ore., tumbled from 40th place to 203rd place; and Cedar Rapids, Iowa, dropped from 81st to 246th.

    Budget constraints have also hurt military towns, which previously had been largely immune to the recession. Last year’s overall No. 1, Killeen-Ft. Hood, Texas, slid to 43rd place; Jacksonville, N.C., home to Camp Lejeune, fell to 102nd from 19th last year; and Lawton, Okla., home to Fort Sill, slipped to 274th from  No. 20 last year.

    In addition to energy, the technology sector has been on a tear. After a decade of tepid growth and some years of job losses, Silicon Valley has blown itself another huge tech bubble, this time driven by the social media craze and a surge in private-equity investment. In the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara metro area, the number of information sector jobs is up 36 percent over the past five years; this year the epicenter of Silicon Valley jumped 22 places to No. 5 among the 65 biggest metro areas. The social media boom has also been very good for the San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City area, which rocketed 16 places to a solid 17th this year.

    But much of the tech growth in the country has continued to flow to more affordable regions less dependent on venture investment. At the head of the pack is Austin, where Apple recently announced a large expansion,  and Salt Lake City, No. 2 on our big cities list, which is a major destination for expansion for Silicon Valley firms such as Adobe, Twitter and  Electronic Arts. Other big players benefiting from the tech boom include seventh-place Raleigh-Cary, N.C., which has been a consistent top 15 performer for the past seven years; Seattle, which rose 18 places to 14th, and Denver at No. 15.

    Perhaps most encouraging of all has been the expansion of the manufacturing sector. In 2011 manufacturing expanded at three time the rate of overall GDP, according to Mark Perry of the University of Michigan-Flint, and the sector added 425,000 jobs, also outpacing the national average.

    As a result, the fortunes of some of America’s hardest-hit manufacturing regions are improving. Columbus, Ind., rose from 235th overall last year to No. 3 on our list this year.  Michigan is beginning to see some signs of new life: perennial cellar dweller Holland-Grand Haven rose a remarkable 202 places to 19th on the overall list. A slew of other Michigan cities rose more than 100 places, including Grand Rapids (64th place), Bay City (136th), Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills (199th), Muskegon-Norton Shores (219th), and Jackson (233th).  It is a glimmer of hope in a region that has lurked near the bottom of our Best Places rankings for as long as we have published it.

    Another group of big cities that may be seeing light at the end of the tunnel are some of the metro areas hit hardest by the bursting of the housing bubble. Miami, Fla., which ranks 21st among the 65 largest metros, Tampa-St.Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla.  (33rd), Phoenix (45th), Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif. (50th), and even Las Vegas (56th) began to show some signs of new life this past year.

    So amidst all the good news, which big cities are still doing badly, or even relatively worse? Sadly, many of the places still declining are located in our home state of California, including Los Angeles (59th place among the biggest metro areas), Sacramento (60th), and, and just across the Bay from Silicon Valley, Oakland (63rd). Only the old, and to date still not recovering,  industrial towns of Providence, R.I. (64th), and Birmingham-Hoover, Ala. (dead last at No. 65), did worse.  And the glad tidings in manufacturing have not touched all the Rust Belt cities: Camden, N.J. (57th), Newark, N.J. (58th), Cleveland, Ohio (61st), and Detroit (62nd) still feature prominently near the bottom.

    Read about how we selected the 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    This piece originally appeared in Forbes.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com and is a distinguished presidential fellow in urban futures at Chapman University, and contributing editor to the City Journal in New York. He is author of The City: A Global History. His newest book is The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050, released in February, 2010.

    Michael Shires, Ph.D. is a professor at Pepperdine University School of Public Policy.

    Austin photo by Bigstockphoto.com.

  • 2012 How We Pick the Best Cities For Job Growth

    We seek to measure the robustness of a region’s growth both recently and over time. We look at all of the metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) for which the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports monthly employment data. They are derived from three-month rolling averages of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics “state and area” unadjusted employment data reported from November 2000 to January 2012.

    This year’s rankings use four measures of growth to rank all 398 metro areas for which full data sets were available from the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment. Only one MSA, Lafayette, La., changed size categories, moving from the “Small” to “Midsize” category, so this year’s rankings can be directly compared to the 2011 rankings. In the instances where the analysis refers to changes in ranking order within the size categories, Lafayette, La., is reported as if it had been included in the “Midsize” category last year.

    The index is calculated from a normalized, weighted summary of: 1) recent growth trend: the current and prior year’s employment growth rates, with the current year emphasized (two points); 2) mid-term growth: the average annual 2006-2011 growth rate (two points); 3) long-term trend and momentum: the sum of the 2006-2011 and 2000-2005 employment growth rates multiplied by the ratio of the 2000-2005 growth rate over the 2006-2011 growth rate (two points); and 4) current year growth (one point).

    The data reflect the North American Industry Classification System categories, including total nonfarm employment, manufacturing, financial services, business and professional services, educational and health services, information, retail and wholesale trade, transportation and utilities, leisure and hospitality, and government.

  • All Cities Rankings – 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2012 Overall Ranking
    Area
    2012 Weighted INDEX
     
    2011 Nonfarm Employment (1000s) 
    2011 Overall Rank 
    Overal Movement
    1
    Odessa, TX
    99.4
    68.3
    11
    10
    2
    Midland, TX
    99.0
    75.3
    5
    3
    3
    Columbus, IN
    95.6
    47.7
    235
    232
    4
    Lafayette, LA
    92.5
    156.3
    34
    30
    5
    Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX
    91.6
    798.5
    6
    1
    6
    Corpus Christi, TX
    90.4
    184.0
    12
    6
    7
    San Angelo, TX
    89.2
    46.7
    32
    25
    8
    Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX
    88.7
    2637.3
    14
    6
    9
    Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA
    87.8
    73.9
    273
    264
    10
    Casper, WY
    84.8
    40.9
    186
    176
    11
    Williamsport, PA
    83.7
    55.4
    73
    62
    12
    Glens Falls, NY
    83.0
    55.6
    77
    65
    13
    Lubbock, TX
    82.6
    131.4
    102
    89
    14
    Laredo, TX
    82.1
    95.0
    74
    60
    15
    Columbia, MO
    82.1
    96.7
    29
    14
    16
    Cumberland, MD-WV
    82.0
    41.7
    42
    26
    17
    Gainesville, GA
    81.9
    75.8
    68
    51
    18
    Portsmouth, NH-ME NECTA
    81.7
    56.0
    45
    27
    19
    Holland-Grand Haven, MI
    80.9
    113.1
    221
    202
    20
    McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX
    79.7
    232.3
    27
    7
    21
    Bismarck, ND
    79.2
    65.7
    2
    -19
    22
    Salt Lake City, UT
    79.1
    637.3
    110
    88
    23
    Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA
    78.8
    95.1
    87
    64
    24
    State College, PA
    78.5
    76.4
    65
    41
    25
    Fargo, ND-MN
    78.4
    127.3
    38
    13
    26
    Ocean City, NJ
    78.0
    36.8
    79
    53
    27
    El Paso, TX
    77.8
    283.1
    3
    -24
    28
    Owensboro, KY
    77.6
    51.8
    88
    60
    29
    Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC
    77.4
    296.4
    90
    61
    30
    Charlottesville, VA
    77.0
    102.3
    116
    86
    31
    Tyler, TX
    76.9
    96.0
    85
    54
    32
    Cheyenne, WY
    76.8
    44.7
    145
    113
    33
    Knoxville, TN
    76.5
    334.8
    94
    61
    34
    Barnstable Town, MA NECTA
    76.2
    94.4
    95
    61
    35
    Longview, TX
    76.1
    98.0
    23
    -12
    36
    Hanford-Corcoran, CA
    76.0
    36.6
    217
    181
    37
    Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan Division
    76.0
    872.3
    84
    47
    38
    San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
    75.9
    891.6
    181
    143
    39
    Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan Division
    75.9
    2077.9
    18
    -21
    40
    Raleigh-Cary, NC
    75.9
    514.5
    83
    43
    41
    Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA
    75.8
    99.0
    25
    -16
    42
    Victoria, TX
    75.6
    50.6
    140
    98
    43
    Pittsburgh, PA
    75.2
    1157.7
    61
    18
    44
    Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX
    74.6
    129.0
    1
    -43
    45
    Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN
    74.0
    759.6
    48
    3
    46
    Grand Junction, CO
    73.8
    60.5
    232
    186
    47
    Provo-Orem, UT
    73.7
    185.8
    98
    51
    48
    Oklahoma City, OK
    73.6
    575.7
    124
    76
    49
    New York City, NY
    73.5
    3816.0
    52
    3
    50
    Northern Virginia, VA
    73.5
    1342.3
    43
    -7
    51
    Bakersfield-Delano, CA
    72.8
    234.5
    194
    143
    52
    St. Joseph, MO-KS
    72.8
    60.6
    159
    107
    53
    Lafayette, IN
    72.4
    95.6
    157
    104
    54
    Pueblo, CO
    72.4
    58.7
    99
    45
    55
    Sherman-Denison, TX
    72.2
    43.6
    184
    129
    56
    Boulder, CO
    72.1
    164.3
    150
    94
    57
    Erie, PA
    72.1
    131.2
    130
    73
    58
    Fayetteville, NC
    71.7
    132.0
    144
    86
    59
    Fort Collins-Loveland, CO
    71.6
    135.9
    50
    -9
    60
    Morgantown, WV
    71.0
    66.5
    33
    -27
    61
    Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL
    70.8
    81.0
    311
    250
    62
    New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA
    70.8
    529.3
    7
    -55
    63
    Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA
    70.7
    90.9
    126
    63
    64
    Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI
    70.6
    375.7
    183
    119
    65
    Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR
    70.6
    58.1
    59
    -6
    66
    Peoria, IL
    70.5
    182.5
    151
    85
    67
    Baltimore City, MD
    70.1
    364.9
    259
    192
    68
    Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan Division
    70.0
    1416.3
    211
    143
    69
    Utica-Rome, NY
    69.8
    133.1
    177
    108
    70
    Amarillo, TX
    69.7
    113.1
    89
    19
    71
    Brownsville-Harlingen, TX
    69.6
    129.5
    28
    -43
    72
    Palm Coast, FL
    69.6
    19.0
    133
    61
    73
    Rapid City, SD
    69.5
    60.5
    97
    24
    74
    Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO
    69.3
    1219.8
    164
    90
    75
    Asheville, NC
    69.2
    172.0
    158
    83
    76
    Columbus, GA-AL
    69.1
    120.6
    199
    123
    77
    Winchester, VA-WV
    69.0
    56.4
    139
    62
    78
    Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Met. Div.
    68.7
    2451.8
    41
    -37
    79
    Greeley, CO
    68.7
    80.3
    193
    114
    80
    Mankato-North Mankato, MN
    68.7
    53.5
    168
    88
    81
    Lincoln, NE
    68.6
    174.9
    101
    20
    82
    Oshkosh-Neenah, WI
    68.5
    94.3
    44
    -38
    83
    Haverhill-North Andover-Amesbury, MA-NH  NECTA Div.
    68.3
    78.1
    55
    -28
    84
    Framingham, MA  NECTA Division
    68.2
    158.0
    210
    126
    85
    San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA Metropolitan Div.
    67.8
    959.1
    218
    133
    86
    Kansas City, KS
    67.7
    435.2
    242
    156
    87
    Sioux Falls, SD
    67.4
    135.6
    96
    9
    88
    Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC
    67.2
    305.3
    225
    137
    89
    Trenton-Ewing, NJ
    66.9
    243.4
    170
    81
    90
    Canton-Massillon, OH
    66.9
    164.7
    337
    247
    91
    Rochester, NY
    66.7
    514.4
    92
    1
    92
    Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
    66.7
    276.8
    136
    44
    93
    Ames, IA
    66.0
    48.2
    114
    21
    94
    Johnson City, TN
    65.9
    79.9
    154
    60
    95
    Dubuque, IA
    65.8
    56.6
    8
    -87
    96
    Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC
    65.7
    830.0
    204
    108
    97
    Logan, UT-ID
    65.6
    54.4
    13
    -84
    98
    Danbury, CT NECTA
    65.6
    67.8
    264
    166
    99
    San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
    65.4
    854.0
    17
    -82
    100
    Altoona, PA
    65.4
    61.5
    93
    -7
    101
    Peabody, MA  NECTA Division
    65.3
    101.4
    247
    146
    102
    Jacksonville, NC
    65.3
    47.8
    19
    -83
    103
    Auburn-Opelika, AL
    65.1
    53.6
    30
    -73
    104
    Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA
    64.7
    38.4
    47
    -57
    105
    Harrisonburg, VA
    64.4
    63.7
    53
    -52
    106
    Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH  NECTA Division
    64.0
    117.5
    191
    85
    107
    Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO
    63.8
    204.3
    63
    -44
    108
    Ann Arbor, MI
    63.7
    202.4
    128
    20
    109
    Evansville, IN-KY
    63.6
    175.6
    176
    67
    110
    Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ
    63.5
    340.2
    125
    15
    111
    Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metropolitan Division
    63.2
    1019.5
    234
    123
    112
    Columbus, OH
    62.7
    924.0
    108
    -4
    113
    Burlington-South Burlington, VT NECTA
    62.6
    114.2
    69
    -44
    114
    Coeur d’Alene, ID
    62.5
    53.0
    147
    33
    115
    Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY
    62.4
    253.0
    156
    41
    116
    Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA
    62.3
    165.5
    306
    190
    117
    Clarksville, TN-KY
    61.9
    84.2
    31
    -86
    118
    Reading, PA
    61.8
    171.0
    153
    35
    119
    Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA
    61.7
    462.6
    118
    -1
    120
    Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan Division
    61.5
    1248.0
    100
    -20
    121
    York-Hanover, PA
    61.4
    177.7
    106
    -15
    122
    Joplin, MO
    61.4
    80.0
    24
    -98
    123
    Rochester-Dover, NH-ME NECTA
    61.3
    56.3
    138
    15
    124
    Baton Rouge, LA
    60.9
    369.2
    198
    74
    125
    Shreveport-Bossier City, LA
    60.8
    178.1
    86
    -39
    126
    Danville, VA
    60.5
    40.0
    299
    173
    127
    Lansing-East Lansing, MI
    60.5
    220.5
    123
    -4
    128
    Iowa City, IA
    60.5
    91.4
    54
    -74
    129
    Olympia, WA
    60.4
    99.4
    263
    134
    130
    Sandusky, OH
    60.2
    35.2
    78
    -52
    131
    St. Cloud, MN
    60.2
    99.6
    72
    -59
    132
    Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN
    60.1
    605.8
    230
    98
    133
    Putnam-Rockland-Westchester, NY
    59.8
    564.6
    195
    62
    134
    Jackson, MS
    59.8
    255.5
    190
    56
    135
    Richmond, VA
    59.6
    613.1
    246
    111
    136
    Bay City, MI
    59.3
    36.9
    334
    198
    137
    Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
    59.3
    993.2
    233
    96
    138
    Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA
    59.3
    19.8
    67
    -71
    139
    Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA NECTA Division
    59.2
    1689.9
    71
    -68
    140
    Las Cruces, NM
    59.2
    69.8
    56
    -84
    141
    Springfield, IL
    59.0
    111.8
    37
    -104
    142
    Napa, CA
    59.0
    60.7
    344
    202
    143
    Salinas, CA
    59.0
    123.0
    335
    192
    144
    Lewiston-Auburn, ME NECTA
    58.8
    48.7
    166
    22
    145
    Burlington, NC
    58.8
    58.0
    262
    117
    146
    Jonesboro, AR
    58.3
    49.2
    36
    -110
    147
    Kankakee-Bradley, IL
    58.1
    43.3
    127
    -20
    148
    Greenville, NC
    58.0
    75.9
    122
    -26
    149
    Springfield, MO
    57.9
    194.1
    161
    12
    150
    Fort Wayne, IN
    57.9
    208.3
    303
    153
    151
    Manchester, NH NECTA
    57.8
    98.7
    180
    29
    152
    Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA
    57.6
    543.1
    175
    23
    153
    Tulsa, OK
    57.3
    412.9
    226
    73
    154
    Decatur, IL
    57.1
    52.7
    189
    35
    155
    Appleton, WI
    57.0
    116.7
    117
    -38
    156
    Green Bay, WI
    56.9
    166.9
    112
    -44
    157
    Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA
    56.9
    2323.4
    329
    172
    158
    Columbia, SC
    56.8
    349.7
    276
    118
    159
    Bellingham, WA
    56.5
    80.4
    333
    174
    160
    Bowling Green, KY
    56.4
    59.8
    62
    -98
    161
    Anchorage, AK
    56.4
    170.0
    22
    -139
    162
    Goldsboro, NC
    56.1
    43.2
    287
    125
    163
    Lebanon, PA
    56.0
    49.8
    21
    -142
    164
    Indianapolis-Carmel, IN
    56.0
    883.5
    188
    24
    165
    Fairbanks, AK
    56.0
    37.4
    15
    -150
    166
    Worcester, MA-CT NECTA
    55.9
    243.9
    141
    -25
    167
    College Station-Bryan, TX
    55.8
    95.9
    4
    -163
    168
    Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL
    55.5
    45.8
    378
    210
    169
    Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA
    55.4
    318.0
    178
    9
    170
    Scranton–Wilkes-Barre, PA
    55.3
    256.6
    148
    -22
    171
    Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
    55.2
    1145.7
    327
    156
    172
    Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV
    55.0
    99.3
    248
    76
    173
    Merced, CA
    54.9
    56.4
    155
    -18
    174
    Warner Robins, GA
    54.9
    59.2
    46
    -128
    175
    Ogden-Clearfield, UT
    54.8
    193.8
    149
    -26
    176
    Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
    54.8
    1729.0
    294
    118
    177
    Dover, DE
    54.8
    64.3
    109
    -68
    178
    Elkhart-Goshen, IN
    54.8
    107.9
    258
    80
    179
    Kingston, NY
    54.7
    61.6
    187
    8
    180
    Charleston, WV
    54.7
    148.1
    197
    17
    181
    Springfield, OH
    54.7
    49.9
    129
    -52
    182
    Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR
    54.4
    339.4
    82
    -100
    183
    Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY
    54.3
    542.7
    104
    -79
    184
    Gulfport-Biloxi, MS
    54.3
    105.9
    26
    -158
    185
    Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC
    54.2
    109.7
    51
    -134
    186
    Farmington, NM
    54.1
    48.8
    272
    86
    187
    Niles-Benton Harbor, MI
    54.0
    59.3
    121
    -66
    188
    Elizabethtown, KY
    54.0
    47.0
    16
    -172
    189
    El Centro, CA
    54.0
    45.3
    251
    62
    190
    Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD
    53.8
    382.2
    209
    19
    191
    La Crosse, WI-MN
    53.2
    73.9
    163
    -28
    192
    Naples-Marco Island, FL
    53.2
    117.5
    370
    178
    193
    Grand Forks, ND-MN
    53.1
    54.0
    39
    -154
    194
    Honolulu, HI
    52.9
    441.9
    105
    -89
    195
    Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ
    51.6
    59.3
    331
    136
    196
    San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA
    51.6
    1241.6
    236
    40
    197
    Decatur, AL
    51.3
    54.4
    266
    69
    198
    Yakima, WA
    51.1
    75.9
    66
    -132
    199
    Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metropolitan Division
    51.1
    1086.4
    369
    170
    200
    Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, FL
    51.1
    71.4
    162
    -38
    201
    Monroe, LA
    51.1
    76.7
    289
    88
    202
    Memphis, TN-MS-AR
    51.0
    606.0
    392
    190
    203
    Corvallis, OR
    50.9
    37.8
    40
    -163
    204
    Jacksonville, FL
    50.9
    595.7
    253
    49
    205
    Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN
    50.8
    992.7
    313
    108
    206
    Vallejo-Fairfield, CA
    50.2
    120.1
    322
    116
    207
    Santa Fe, NM
    50.1
    61.0
    227
    20
    208
    Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
    50.0
    1018.3
    167
    -41
    209
    Punta Gorda, FL
    50.0
    42.4
    238
    29
    210
    Salisbury, MD
    49.9
    52.9
    275
    65
    211
    Philadelphia City, PA
    49.7
    657.3
    58
    -153
    212
    Kansas City, MO
    49.7
    548.1
    290
    78
    213
    Florence, SC
    49.6
    82.7
    281
    68
    214
    Binghamton, NY
    49.4
    109.9
    228
    14
    215
    Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA
    49.4
    87.8
    347
    132
    216
    Sioux City, IA-NE-SD
    49.2
    73.3
    208
    -8
    217
    Jefferson City, MO
    49.2
    76.9
    119
    -98
    218
    Madison, WI
    49.1
    344.3
    107
    -111
    219
    Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI
    48.8
    60.2
    393
    174
    220
    Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ
    48.6
    878.3
    254
    34
    221
    South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI
    48.6
    135.7
    345
    124
    222
    Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA
    48.5
    321.6
    205
    -17
    223
    Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
    48.4
    437.8
    245
    22
    224
    Bangor, ME NECTA
    48.1
    64.6
    271
    47
    225
    New Haven, CT NECTA
    47.9
    268.5
    222
    -3
    226
    Kokomo, IN
    47.8
    41.6
    215
    -11
    227
    Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ
    47.8
    1739.9
    339
    112
    228
    Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL
    47.7
    205.4
    382
    154
    229
    Waco, TX
    47.6
    104.4
    49
    -180
    230
    Bethesda-Rockville-Frederick, MD Metropolitan Division
    47.3
    561.1
    70
    -160
    231
    Yuba City, CA
    47.3
    37.5
    356
    125
    232
    Gary, IN Metropolitan Division
    47.2
    268.5
    328
    96
    233
    Jackson, MI
    47.2
    54.6
    391
    158
    234
    Tacoma, WA Metropolitan Division
    47.0
    265.8
    223
    -11
    235
    Boise City-Nampa, ID
    47.0
    256.8
    309
    74
    236
    Lexington-Fayette, KY
    46.5
    249.1
    103
    -133
    237
    Syracuse, NY
    46.4
    314.4
    172
    -65
    238
    Wheeling, WV-OH
    46.0
    66.7
    34
    -204
    239
    Macon, GA
    45.9
    96.6
    279
    40
    240
    Idaho Falls, ID
    45.6
    48.7
    216
    -24
    241
    Lewiston, ID-WA
    45.5
    26.0
    305
    64
    242
    Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA Metropolitan Division
    45.4
    1382.6
    317
    75
    243
    Johnstown, PA
    45.4
    60.0
    57
    -186
    244
    Athens-Clarke County, GA
    45.4
    84.1
    132
    -112
    245
    Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL Metropolitan Division
    45.2
    3657.9
    250
    5
    246
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    45.1
    136.2
    81
    -165
    247
    Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC
    45.0
    733.5
    244
    -3
    248
    Lancaster, PA
    45.0
    226.8
    192
    -56
    249
    Chattanooga, TN-GA
    45.0
    233.4
    203
    -46
    250
    Dayton, OH
    44.9
    377.9
    336
    86
    251
    St. George, UT
    44.9
    46.3
    324
    73
    252
    Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL
    44.8
    55.1
    131
    -121
    253
    Rockford, IL
    44.2
    146.8
    308
    55
    254
    Pascagoula, MS
    44.1
    56.1
    10
    -244
    255
    Huntsville, AL
    44.0
    205.6
    113
    -142
    256
    Bloomington-Normal, IL
    43.9
    89.8
    142
    -114
    257
    Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA
    43.7
    117.5
    265
    8
    258
    Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL
    43.5
    156.9
    359
    101
    259
    Winston-Salem, NC
    43.3
    207.2
    358
    99
    260
    Colorado Springs, CO
    43.2
    247.5
    243
    -17
    261
    Mobile, AL
    42.9
    174.7
    165
    -96
    262
    New Bedford, MA NECTA
    42.8
    64.8
    75
    -187
    263
    Topeka, KS
    42.5
    106.9
    185
    -78
    264
    Abilene, TX
    42.5
    64.7
    160
    -104
    265
    Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC
    42.3
    207.8
    179
    -86
    266
    Battle Creek, MI
    42.1
    56.0
    207
    -59
    267
    Fresno, CA
    42.0
    281.2
    310
    43
    268
    Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH
    42.0
    114.3
    292
    24
    269
    Manhattan, KS
    41.9
    54.5
    9
    -260
    270
    Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX
    41.8
    157.6
    115
    -155
    271
    Hot Springs, AR
    41.7
    36.9
    146
    -125
    272
    Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, MA  NECTA Division
    41.6
    87.2
    76
    -196
    273
    Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME NECTA
    41.5
    187.0
    152
    -121
    274
    Lawton, OK
    41.2
    42.4
    20
    -254
    275
    Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA
    40.9
    43.6
    213
    -62
    276
    Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
    40.7
    1147.6
    362
    86
    277
    Anderson, IN
    40.6
    39.7
    284
    7
    278
    Eau Claire, WI
    40.1
    79.3
    60
    -218
    279
    Redding, CA
    40.1
    58.1
    353
    74
    280
    Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA
    39.8
    275.9
    283
    3
    281
    Billings, MT
    39.3
    76.6
    137
    -144
    282
    Edison-New Brunswick, NJ Metropolitan Division
    39.2
    978.3
    249
    -33
    283
    Fond du Lac, WI
    39.2
    45.2
    302
    19
    284
    Rochester, MN
    39.0
    101.0
    202
    -82
    285
    Lima, OH
    38.8
    52.5
    326
    41
    286
    Stockton, CA
    38.8
    189.6
    361
    75
    287
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    38.7
    93.2
    134
    -153
    288
    Tucson, AZ
    38.6
    358.4
    332
    44
    289
    Tallahassee, FL
    38.3
    169.5
    201
    -88
    290
    Springfield, MA-CT NECTA
    38.3
    285.4
    224
    -66
    291
    Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Met. Div.
    38.1
    715.9
    342
    51
    292
    North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL
    38.0
    242.6
    354
    62
    293
    Albuquerque, NM
    38.0
    371.0
    278
    -15
    294
    Hattiesburg, MS
    37.9
    58.6
    80
    -214
    295
    Alexandria, LA
    37.9
    62.6
    174
    -121
    296
    Akron, OH
    37.8
    318.1
    298
    2
    297
    Pocatello, ID
    37.6
    36.2
    341
    44
    298
    Spartanburg, SC
    37.4
    118.0
    231
    -67
    299
    Savannah, GA
    37.3
    149.6
    200
    -99
    300
    Muncie, IN
    37.2
    50.1
    314
    14
    301
    Toledo, OH
    37.2
    301.8
    277
    -24
    302
    St. Louis, MO-IL
    37.2
    1289.9
    206
    -96
    303
    Great Falls, MT
    36.9
    34.2
    64
    -239
    304
    Ithaca, NY
    36.7
    62.7
    35
    -269
    305
    Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA
    36.4
    397.0
    196
    -109
    306
    Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI
    36.3
    85.0
    282
    -24
    307
    Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI
    36.3
    808.8
    143
    -164
    308
    West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach, FL Met. Div.
    36.3
    509.1
    346
    38
    309
    Bloomington, IN
    36.1
    81.2
    135
    -174
    310
    Roanoke, VA
    36.0
    155.4
    316
    6
    311
    Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metropolitan Division
    35.7
    373.4
    304
    -7
    312
    Wilmington, NC
    35.5
    134.3
    214
    -98
    313
    Las Vegas-Paradise, NV
    35.4
    813.2
    376
    63
    314
    Flint, MI
    35.3
    136.6
    390
    76
    315
    Bremerton-Silverdale, WA
    35.3
    81.8
    286
    -29
    316
    Lawrence, KS
    34.5
    50.3
    270
    -46
    317
    Elmira, NY
    34.4
    39.0
    91
    -226
    318
    Salem, OR
    34.2
    141.0
    269
    -49
    319
    Spokane, WA
    34.0
    202.9
    261
    -58
    320
    Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA
    33.8
    222.9
    318
    -2
    321
    Danville, IL
    33.7
    29.2
    371
    50
    322
    Valdosta, GA
    33.1
    52.1
    295
    -27
    323
    Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH
    33.1
    69.2
    315
    -8
    324
    Camden, NJ Metropolitan Division
    33.1
    502.8
    301
    -23
    325
    Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL
    33.0
    157.6
    171
    -154
    326
    Lake Charles, LA
    32.6
    88.2
    267
    -59
    327
    San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA
    32.1
    96.0
    319
    -8
    328
    Greensboro-High Point, NC
    31.9
    345.3
    385
    57
    329
    Dothan, AL
    31.7
    57.7
    397
    68
    330
    Pittsfield, MA NECTA
    31.6
    34.9
    120
    -210
    331
    Missoula, MT
    31.4
    53.8
    252
    -79
    332
    Mansfield, OH
    31.2
    52.5
    383
    51
    333
    Gainesville, FL
    30.8
    125.9
    257
    -76
    334
    Newark-Union, NJ-PA Metropolitan Division
    29.8
    974.2
    343
    9
    335
    Visalia-Porterville, CA
    29.5
    104.5
    320
    -15
    336
    Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ
    29.4
    135.2
    349
    13
    337
    Bend, OR
    29.1
    60.1
    363
    26
    338
    Jackson, TN
    28.9
    58.3
    297
    -41
    339
    Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan Division
    28.8
    331.7
    364
    25
    340
    Medford, OR
    28.6
    75.1
    321
    -19
    341
    Gadsden, AL
    28.6
    35.6
    291
    -50
    342
    Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL
    28.2
    193.2
    351
    9
    343
    Reno-Sparks, NV
    27.9
    190.3
    372
    29
    344
    Lynchburg, VA
    27.8
    102.1
    237
    -107
    345
    Ocala, FL
    27.2
    90.9
    377
    32
    346
    Port St. Lucie, FL
    26.9
    120.5
    293
    -53
    347
    Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL
    26.5
    177.2
    229
    -118
    348
    Racine, WI
    26.5
    74.8
    296
    -52
    349
    Nashua, NH-MA  NECTA Division
    26.4
    124.0
    312
    -37
    350
    Wichita, KS
    26.4
    282.0
    288
    -62
    351
    Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL
    26.4
    195.4
    323
    -28
    352
    Madera-Chowchilla, CA
    26.4
    31.8
    280
    -72
    353
    Norwich-New London, CT-RI NECTA
    26.3
    125.7
    268
    -85
    354
    Flagstaff, AZ
    26.2
    59.0
    111
    -243
    355
    Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan Division
    26.1
    3822.4
    373
    18
    356
    Modesto, CA
    25.9
    142.5
    241
    -115
    357
    Wausau, WI
    25.8
    66.5
    355
    -2
    358
    Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville, CA
    25.8
    801.3
    367
    9
    359
    Montgomery, AL
    25.7
    164.3
    338
    -21
    360
    Michigan City-La Porte, IN
    25.4
    42.3
    350
    -10
    361
    Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH
    24.7
    985.0
    307
    -54
    362
    Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ
    24.5
    45.6
    375
    13
    363
    Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan Division
    24.3
    699.8
    384
    21
    364
    Duluth, MN-WI
    24.1
    125.9
    173
    -191
    365
    Chico, CA
    23.3
    67.8
    239
    -126
    366
    Waterbury, CT NECTA
    23.3
    62.5
    330
    -36
    367
    Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO-IL
    22.7
    43.3
    240
    -127
    368
    Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC
    21.7
    142.9
    388
    20
    369
    Wichita Falls, TX
    20.7
    57.8
    274
    -95
    370
    Terre Haute, IN
    20.6
    69.7
    220
    -150
    371
    Prescott, AZ
    20.5
    53.3
    379
    8
    372
    Cleveland, TN
    20.3
    38.5
    285
    -87
    373
    Sumter, SC
    20.0
    36.7
    260
    -113
    374
    Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Division
    19.4
    953.6
    395
    21
    375
    Longview, WA
    19.2
    35.0
    348
    -27
    376
    Yuma, AZ
    19.1
    49.1
    365
    -11
    377
    Leominster-Fitchburg-Gardner, MA NECTA
    18.3
    47.2
    182
    -195
    378
    Anderson, SC
    18.1
    58.2
    212
    -166
    379
    Eugene-Springfield, OR
    17.8
    138.7
    380
    1
    380
    Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA
    17.7
    539.3
    256
    -124
    381
    Pine Bluff, AR
    17.3
    36.6
    398
    17
    382
    Brunswick, GA
    17.2
    39.2
    368
    -14
    383
    Anniston-Oxford, AL
    15.8
    47.7
    352
    -31
    384
    Birmingham-Hoover, AL
    14.9
    487.3
    374
    -10
    385
    Fort Smith, AR-OK
    13.6
    110.2
    255
    -130
    386
    Kalamazoo-Portage, MI
    13.3
    133.7
    300
    -86
    387
    Rome, GA
    13.2
    37.1
    381
    -6
    388
    Rocky Mount, NC
    12.4
    59.6
    325
    -63
    389
    Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA
    11.4
    168.0
    357
    -32
    390
    Sheboygan, WI
    11.1
    57.2
    360
    -30
    391
    Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV
    10.3
    43.1
    386
    -5
    392
    Monroe, MI
    9.3
    37.0
    387
    -5
    393
    Albany, GA
    7.0
    59.3
    340
    -53
    394
    Champaign-Urbana, IL
    6.0
    103.4
    219
    -175
    395
    Carson City, NV
    5.1
    27.7
    366
    -29
    396
    Janesville, WI
    4.4
    60.0
    396
    0
    397
    Morristown, TN
    2.8
    43.6
    389
    -8
    398
    Dalton, GA
    0.5
    62.8
    394
    -4
  • 2011 How We Pick the Best Cities For Job Growth

    The methodology for the 2011 rankings largely corresponds to that used last year, which emphasizes the robustness of a region’s growth both recently and over time. It allows the rankings to include all of the metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) for which the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports monthly employment data. They are derived from three-month rolling averages of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics “state and area” unadjusted employment data reported from November 1999 to January 2011.

    “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment, unlike last year when some were “held over” in size categories to facilitate comparisons.

    This year’s rankings use four measures of growth to rank all areas for which full data sets were available from the past 10 years. Because of the expanded availability of data since last year, we were able to include another small MSA (Manhattan, KS) in this year’s rankings for a total of 398 regions. Generally, this year’s rankings can be directly compared to the 2010 rankings for MSAs for the large and midsize categories, although there are eight MSAs that are reported in the Small size category that were Medium last year and one (Honolulu, HI) that was large that is now reported as medium-sized. In instances where the analysis refers to changes in ranking order, these adjustments are made accordingly, reporting the changes in ranking as if they had been categorized in their current category last year.

    The index is calculated from a normalized, weighted summary of: 1) recent growth trend: the current and prior year’s employment growth rates, with the current year emphasized (two points); 2) mid-term growth: the average annual 2005-2010 growth rate (two points); 3) long-term trend and momentum: the sum of the 2005-2010 and 1999-2004 employment growth rates multiplied by the ratio of the 1999-2004 growth rate over the 2005-2010 growth rate (two points); and 4) current year growth (one point).

    The data reflect the North American Industry Classification System categories, including total nonfarm employment, manufacturing, financial services, business and professional services, educational and health services, information, retail and wholesale trade, transportation and utilities, leisure and hospitality, and government.

  • Large Cities Rankings – 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2012 New Geography Rankings – Large (> 450k employment)

    2012  Rank Among Large Cities
    Area
    2012 Weighted INDEX
     

    2011 Nonfarm Employment (1000s) 
    2011 Size Ranking
    Size Movement
    1
    Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX
    91.6
    798.5
    1
    0
    2
    Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX
    88.7
    2637.3
    3
    1
    3
    Salt Lake City, UT
    79.1
    637.3
    20
    17
    4
    Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan Division
    76.0
    872.3
    15
    11
    5
    San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
    75.9
    891.6
    27
    22
    6
    Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan Division
    75.9
    2077.9
    5
    -1
    7
    Raleigh-Cary, NC
    75.9
    514.5
    14
    7
    8
    Pittsburgh, PA
    75.2
    1157.7
    11
    3
    9
    Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN
    74.0
    759.6
    8
    -1
    10
    Oklahoma City, OK
    73.6
    575.7
    22
    12
    11
    New York City, NY
    73.5
    3816.0
    9
    -2
    12
    Northern Virginia, VA
    73.5
    1342.3
    7
    -5
    13
    New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA
    70.8
    529.3
    2
    -11
    14
    Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan Division
    70.0
    1416.3
    32
    18
    15
    Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO
    69.3
    1219.8
    24
    9
    16
    Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Met. Div.
    68.7
    2451.8
    6
    -10
    17
    San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA Met. Div.
    67.8
    959.1
    33
    16
    18
    Rochester, NY
    66.7
    514.4
    16
    -2
    19
    Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC
    65.7
    830.0
    30
    11
    20
    San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
    65.4
    854.0
    4
    -16
    21
    Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metropolitan Division
    63.2
    1019.5
    36
    15
    22
    Columbus, OH
    62.7
    924.0
    19
    -3
    23
    Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA
    61.7
    462.6
    21
    -2
    24
    Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan Division
    61.5
    1248.0
    17
    -7
    25
    Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN
    60.1
    605.8
    34
    9
    26
    Putnam-Rockland-Westchester, NY
    59.8
    564.6
    29
    3
    27
    Richmond, VA
    59.6
    613.1
    39
    12
    28
    Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
    59.3
    993.2
    35
    7
    29
    Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA NECTA Division
    59.2
    1689.9
    13
    -16
    30
    Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA
    57.6
    543.1
    26
    -4
    31
    Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA
    56.9
    2323.4
    52
    21
    32
    Indianapolis-Carmel, IN
    56.0
    883.5
    28
    -4
    33
    Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
    55.2
    1145.7
    51
    18
    34
    Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
    54.8
    1729.0
    46
    12
    35
    Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY
    54.3
    542.7
    18
    -17
    36
    San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA
    51.6
    1241.6
    37
    1
    37
    Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metropolitan Division
    51.1
    1086.4
    59
    22
    38
    Memphis, TN-MS-AR
    51.0
    606.0
    64
    26
    39
    Jacksonville, FL
    50.9
    595.7
    42
    3
    40
    Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN
    50.8
    992.7
    49
    9
    41
    Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
    50.0
    1018.3
    25
    -16
    42
    Philadelphia City, PA
    49.7
    657.3
    10
    -32
    43
    Kansas City, MO
    49.7
    548.1
    45
    2
    44
    Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ
    48.6
    878.3
    43
    -1
    45
    Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ
    47.8
    1739.9
    53
    8
    46
    Bethesda-Rockville-Frederick, MD Metropolitan Division
    47.3
    561.1
    12
    -34
    47
    Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA Metropolitan Division
    45.4
    1382.6
    50
    3
    48
    Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL Metropolitan Division
    45.2
    3657.9
    41
    -7
    49
    Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC
    45.0
    733.5
    38
    -11
    50
    Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
    40.7
    1147.6
    57
    7
    51
    Edison-New Brunswick, NJ Metropolitan Division
    39.2
    978.3
    40
    -11
    52
    Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Met. Div.
    38.1
    715.9
    54
    2
    53
    St. Louis, MO-IL
    37.2
    1289.9
    31
    -22
    54
    Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI
    36.3
    808.8
    23
    -31
    55
    West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach, FL Met. Div.
    36.3
    509.1
    56
    1
    56
    Las Vegas-Paradise, NV
    35.4
    813.2
    62
    6
    57
    Camden, NJ Metropolitan Division
    33.1
    502.8
    47
    -10
    58
    Newark-Union, NJ-PA Metropolitan Division
    29.8
    974.2
    55
    -3
    59
    Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan Division
    26.1
    3822.4
    60
    1
    60
    Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville, CA
    25.8
    801.3
    58
    -2
    61
    Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH
    24.7
    985.0
    48
    -13
    62
    Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan Division
    24.3
    699.8
    63
    1
    63
    Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Division
    19.4
    953.6
    65
    2
    64
    Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA
    17.7
    539.3
    44
    -20
    65
    Birmingham-Hoover, AL
    14.9
    487.3
    61
    -4
  • Midsized Cities Rankings – 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2012 New Geography Rankings – MEDIUM (150k – 450k employment)

    2012  Rank Among Medium Cities
    Area
    2012 Weighted INDEX
     

    2011 Nonfarm Employment (1000s) 
    2011 Size Ranking
    Size Movement
    1
    Lafayette, LA
    92.5
    156.3
    34
    33
    2
    Corpus Christi, TX
    90.4
    184.0
    2
    0
    3
    McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX
    79.7
    232.3
    6
    3
    4
    El Paso, TX
    77.8
    283.1
    1
    -3
    5
    Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC
    77.4
    296.4
    8
    3
    6
    Knoxville, TN
    76.5
    334.8
    9
    3
    7
    Provo-Orem, UT
    73.7
    185.8
    30
    23
    8
    Bakersfield-Delano, CA
    72.8
    234.5
    43
    35
    9
    Boulder, CO
    72.1
    164.3
    26
    17
    10
    Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI
    70.6
    375.7
    40
    30
    11
    Peoria, IL
    70.5
    182.5
    65
    54
    12
    Baltimore City, MD
    70.1
    364.9
    60
    48
    13
    Asheville, NC
    69.2
    172.0
    31
    18
    14
    Lincoln, NE
    68.6
    174.9
    10
    -4
    15
    Framingham, MA  NECTA Division
    68.2
    158.0
    50
    35
    16
    Kansas City, KS
    67.7
    435.2
    57
    41
    17
    Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC
    67.2
    305.3
    54
    37
    18
    Trenton-Ewing, NJ
    66.9
    243.4
    11
    -7
    19
    Canton-Massillon, OH
    66.9
    164.7
    79
    60
    20
    Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
    66.7
    276.8
    22
    2
    21
    Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO
    63.8
    204.3
    5
    -16
    22
    Ann Arbor, MI
    63.7
    202.4
    21
    -1
    23
    Evansville, IN-KY
    63.6
    175.6
    37
    14
    24
    Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ
    63.5
    340.2
    20
    -4
    25
    Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY
    62.4
    253.0
    29
    4
    26
    Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA
    62.3
    165.5
    66
    40
    27
    Reading, PA
    61.8
    171.0
    55
    28
    28
    York-Hanover, PA
    61.4
    177.7
    46
    18
    29
    Baton Rouge, LA
    60.9
    369.2
    45
    16
    30
    Shreveport-Bossier City, LA
    60.8
    178.1
    12
    -18
    31
    Lansing-East Lansing, MI
    60.5
    220.5
    68
    37
    32
    Jackson, MS
    59.8
    255.5
    41
    9
    33
    Springfield, MO
    57.9
    194.1
    24
    -9
    34
    Fort Wayne, IN
    57.9
    208.3
    68
    34
    35
    Tulsa, OK
    57.3
    412.9
    37
    2
    36
    Green Bay, WI
    56.9
    166.9
    16
    -20
    37
    Columbia, SC
    56.8
    349.7
    62
    25
    38
    Anchorage, AK
    56.4
    170.0
    3
    -35
    39
    Worcester, MA-CT NECTA
    55.9
    243.9
    59
    20
    40
    Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA
    55.4
    318.0
    38
    -2
    41
    Scranton–Wilkes-Barre, PA
    55.3
    256.6
    28
    -13
    42
    Ogden-Clearfield, UT
    54.8
    193.8
    19
    -23
    43
    Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR
    54.4
    339.4
    15
    -28
    44
    Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD
    53.8
    382.2
    49
    5
    45
    Honolulu, HI
    52.9
    441.9
    13
    3
    46
    Madison, WI
    49.1
    344.3
    33
    -13
    47
    Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA
    48.5
    321.6
    48
    1
    48
    Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
    48.4
    437.8
    59
    11
    49
    New Haven, CT NECTA
    47.9
    268.5
    44
    -5
    50
    Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL
    47.7
    205.4
    89
    39
    51
    Gary, IN Metropolitan Division
    47.2
    268.5
    76
    25
    52
    Tacoma, WA Metropolitan Division
    47.0
    265.8
    39
    -13
    53
    Boise City-Nampa, ID
    47.0
    256.8
    71
    18
    54
    Lexington-Fayette, KY
    46.5
    249.1
    14
    -40
    55
    Syracuse, NY
    46.4
    314.4
    18
    -37
    56
    Lancaster, PA
    45.0
    226.8
    62
    6
    57
    Chattanooga, TN-GA
    45.0
    233.4
    47
    -10
    58
    Dayton, OH
    44.9
    377.9
    78
    20
    59
    Huntsville, AL
    44.0
    205.6
    17
    -42
    60
    Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL
    43.5
    156.9
    85
    25
    61
    Winston-Salem, NC
    43.3
    207.2
    47
    -14
    62
    Colorado Springs, CO
    43.2
    247.5
    58
    -4
    63
    Mobile, AL
    42.9
    174.7
    63
    0
    64
    Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC
    42.3
    207.8
    39
    -25
    65
    Fresno, CA
    42.0
    281.2
    72
    7
    66
    Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX
    41.8
    157.6
    18
    -48
    67
    Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME NECTA
    41.5
    187.0
    41
    -26
    68
    Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA
    39.8
    275.9
    80
    12
    69
    Stockton, CA
    38.8
    189.6
    78
    9
    70
    Tucson, AZ
    38.6
    358.4
    58
    -12
    71
    Tallahassee, FL
    38.3
    169.5
    16
    -55
    72
    Springfield, MA-CT NECTA
    38.3
    285.4
    77
    5
    73
    North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL
    38.0
    242.6
    89
    16
    74
    Albuquerque, NM
    38.0
    371.0
    64
    -10
    75
    Akron, OH
    37.8
    318.1
    67
    -8
    76
    Toledo, OH
    37.2
    301.8
    95
    19
    77
    Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA
    36.4
    397.0
    44
    -33
    78
    Roanoke, VA
    36.0
    155.4
    51
    -27
    79
    Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metropolitan Division
    35.7
    373.4
    71
    -8
    80
    Spokane, WA
    34.0
    202.9
    31
    -49
    81
    Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA
    33.8
    222.9
    93
    12
    82
    Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL
    33.0
    157.6
    45
    -37
    83
    Greensboro-High Point, NC
    31.9
    345.3
    90
    7
    84
    Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan Division
    28.8
    331.7
    72
    -12
    85
    Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL
    28.2
    193.2
    75
    -10
    86
    Reno-Sparks, NV
    27.9
    190.3
    92
    6
    87
    Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL
    26.5
    177.2
    56
    -31
    88
    Wichita, KS
    26.4
    282.0
    64
    -24
    89
    Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL
    26.4
    195.4
    70
    -19
    90
    Montgomery, AL
    25.7
    164.3
    52
    -38
    91
    Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA
    11.4
    168.0
    88
    -3
  • Small Cities Rankings – 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2012 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2012 New Geography Rankings – SMALL (< 150k employment)

    2012  Rank Among Small Cities
    Area
    2012 Weighted INDEX
     

    2011 Nonfarm Employment (1000s) 
    2011 Size Ranking
    Size Movement
    1
    Odessa, TX
    99.4
    68.3
    8
    7
    2
    Midland, TX
    99.0
    75.3
    4
    2
    3
    Columbus, IN
    95.6
    47.7
    143
    140
    4
    Lafayette, LA
    92.5
    156.3
    111
    107
    5
    San Angelo, TX
    89.2
    46.7
    23
    18
    6
    Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA
    87.8
    73.9
    168
    162
    7
    Casper, WY
    84.8
    40.9
    119
    112
    8
    Williamsport, PA
    83.7
    55.4
    55
    47
    9
    Glens Falls, NY
    83.0
    55.6
    59
    50
    10
    Lubbock, TX
    82.6
    131.4
    74
    64
    11
    Laredo, TX
    82.1
    95.0
    56
    45
    12
    Columbia, MO
    82.1
    96.7
    20
    8
    13
    Cumberland, MD-WV
    82.0
    41.7
    32
    19
    14
    Gainesville, GA
    81.9
    75.8
    52
    38
    15
    Portsmouth, NH-ME NECTA
    81.7
    56.0
    34
    19
    16
    Holland-Grand Haven, MI
    80.9
    113.1
    138
    122
    17
    Bismarck, ND
    79.2
    65.7
    2
    -15
    18
    Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA
    78.8
    95.1
    65
    47
    19
    State College, PA
    78.5
    76.4
    49
    30
    20
    Fargo, ND-MN
    78.4
    127.3
    29
    9
    21
    Ocean City, NJ
    78.0
    36.8
    61
    40
    22
    Owensboro, KY
    77.6
    51.8
    66
    44
    23
    Charlottesville, VA
    77.0
    102.3
    78
    55
    24
    Tyler, TX
    76.9
    96.0
    64
    40
    25
    Cheyenne, WY
    76.8
    44.7
    99
    74
    26
    Barnstable Town, MA NECTA
    76.2
    94.4
    70
    44
    27
    Longview, TX
    76.1
    98.0
    15
    -12
    28
    Hanford-Corcoran, CA
    76.0
    36.6
    135
    107
    29
    Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA
    75.8
    99.0
    17
    -12
    30
    Victoria, TX
    75.6
    50.6
    96
    66
    31
    Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX
    74.6
    129.0
    1
    -30
    32
    Grand Junction, CO
    73.8
    60.5
    142
    110
    33
    St. Joseph, MO-KS
    72.8
    60.6
    105
    72
    34
    Lafayette, IN
    72.4
    95.6
    104
    70
    35
    Pueblo, CO
    72.4
    58.7
    73
    38
    36
    Sherman-Denison, TX
    72.2
    43.6
    117
    81
    37
    Erie, PA
    72.1
    131.2
    87
    50
    38
    Fayetteville, NC
    71.7
    132.0
    98
    60
    39
    Fort Collins-Loveland, CO
    71.6
    135.9
    38
    -1
    40
    Morgantown, WV
    71.0
    66.5
    24
    -16
    41
    Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL
    70.8
    81.0
    191
    150
    42
    Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA
    70.7
    90.9
    84
    42
    43
    Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR
    70.6
    58.1
    45
    2
    44
    Utica-Rome, NY
    69.8
    133.1
    114
    70
    45
    Amarillo, TX
    69.7
    113.1
    67
    22
    46
    Brownsville-Harlingen, TX
    69.6
    129.5
    19
    -27
    47
    Palm Coast, FL
    69.6
    19.0
    90
    43
    48
    Rapid City, SD
    69.5
    60.5
    72
    24
    49
    Columbus, GA-AL
    69.1
    120.6
    125
    76
    50
    Winchester, VA-WV
    69.0
    56.4
    95
    45
    51
    Greeley, CO
    68.7
    80.3
    123
    72
    52
    Mankato-North Mankato, MN
    68.7
    53.5
    110
    58
    53
    Oshkosh-Neenah, WI
    68.5
    94.3
    33
    -20
    54
    Haverhill-North Andover-Amesbury, MA-NH  NECTA Division
    68.3
    78.1
    42
    -12
    55
    Sioux Falls, SD
    67.4
    135.6
    71
    16
    56
    Ames, IA
    66.0
    48.2
    77
    21
    57
    Johnson City, TN
    65.9
    79.9
    102
    45
    58
    Dubuque, IA
    65.8
    56.6
    5
    -53
    59
    Logan, UT-ID
    65.6
    54.4
    9
    -50
    60
    Danbury, CT NECTA
    65.6
    67.8
    159
    99
    61
    Altoona, PA
    65.4
    61.5
    69
    8
    62
    Peabody, MA  NECTA Division
    65.3
    101.4
    149
    87
    63
    Jacksonville, NC
    65.3
    47.8
    12
    -51
    64
    Auburn-Opelika, AL
    65.1
    53.6
    21
    -43
    65
    Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA
    64.7
    38.4
    36
    -29
    66
    Harrisonburg, VA
    64.4
    63.7
    40
    -26
    67
    Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH  NECTA Division
    64.0
    117.5
    122
    55
    68
    Burlington-South Burlington, VT NECTA
    62.6
    114.2
    53
    -15
    69
    Coeur d’Alene, ID
    62.5
    53.0
    101
    32
    70
    Clarksville, TN-KY
    61.9
    84.2
    22
    -48
    71
    Joplin, MO
    61.4
    80.0
    16
    -55
    72
    Rochester-Dover, NH-ME NECTA
    61.3
    56.3
    94
    22
    73
    Danville, VA
    60.5
    40.0
    186
    113
    74
    Iowa City, IA
    60.5
    91.4
    41
    -33
    75
    Olympia, WA
    60.4
    99.4
    158
    83
    76
    Sandusky, OH
    60.2
    35.2
    60
    -16
    77
    St. Cloud, MN
    60.2
    99.6
    54
    -23
    78
    Bay City, MI
    59.3
    36.9
    205
    127
    79
    Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA
    59.3
    19.8
    51
    -28
    80
    Las Cruces, NM
    59.2
    69.8
    43
    -37
    81
    Springfield, IL
    59.0
    111.8
    28
    -53
    82
    Napa, CA
    59.0
    60.7
    209
    127
    83
    Salinas, CA
    59.0
    123.0
    206
    123
    84
    Lewiston-Auburn, ME NECTA
    58.8
    48.7
    109
    25
    85
    Burlington, NC
    58.8
    58.0
    157
    72
    86
    Jonesboro, AR
    58.3
    49.2
    27
    -59
    87
    Kankakee-Bradley, IL
    58.1
    43.3
    85
    -2
    88
    Greenville, NC
    58.0
    75.9
    83
    -5
    89
    Manchester, NH NECTA
    57.8
    98.7
    115
    26
    90
    Decatur, IL
    57.1
    52.7
    121
    31
    91
    Appleton, WI
    57.0
    116.7
    79
    -12
    92
    Bellingham, WA
    56.5
    80.4
    204
    112
    93
    Bowling Green, KY
    56.4
    59.8
    47
    -46
    94
    Goldsboro, NC
    56.1
    43.2
    178
    84
    95
    Lebanon, PA
    56.0
    49.8
    14
    -81
    96
    Fairbanks, AK
    56.0
    37.4
    10
    -86
    97
    College Station-Bryan, TX
    55.8
    95.9
    3
    -94
    98
    Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL
    55.5
    45.8
    228
    130
    99
    Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV
    55.0
    99.3
    150
    51
    100
    Merced, CA
    54.9
    56.4
    103
    3
    101
    Warner Robins, GA
    54.9
    59.2
    35
    -66
    102
    Dover, DE
    54.8
    64.3
    75
    -27
    103
    Elkhart-Goshen, IN
    54.8
    107.9
    155
    52
    104
    Kingston, NY
    54.7
    61.6
    120
    16
    105
    Charleston, WV
    54.7
    148.1
    124
    -12
    106
    Springfield, OH
    54.7
    49.9
    86
    -20
    107
    Gulfport-Biloxi, MS
    54.3
    105.9
    18
    -89
    108
    Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC
    54.2
    109.7
    39
    -69
    109
    Farmington, NM
    54.1
    48.8
    167
    58
    110
    Niles-Benton Harbor, MI
    54.0
    59.3
    82
    -28
    111
    Elizabethtown, KY
    54.0
    47.0
    11
    -100
    112
    El Centro, CA
    54.0
    45.3
    151
    39
    113
    La Crosse, WI-MN
    53.2
    73.9
    108
    -5
    114
    Naples-Marco Island, FL
    53.2
    117.5
    224
    110
    115
    Grand Forks, ND-MN
    53.1
    54.0
    30
    -85
    116
    Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ
    51.6
    59.3
    203
    87
    117
    Decatur, AL
    51.3
    54.4
    161
    44
    118
    Yakima, WA
    51.1
    75.9
    50
    -68
    119
    Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, FL
    51.1
    71.4
    107
    -12
    120
    Monroe, LA
    51.1
    76.7
    179
    59
    121
    Corvallis, OR
    50.9
    37.8
    31
    -90
    122
    Vallejo-Fairfield, CA
    50.2
    120.1
    198
    76
    123
    Santa Fe, NM
    50.1
    61.0
    139
    16
    124
    Punta Gorda, FL
    50.0
    42.4
    145
    21
    125
    Salisbury, MD
    49.9
    52.9
    170
    45
    126
    Florence, SC
    49.6
    82.7
    173
    47
    127
    Binghamton, NY
    49.4
    109.9
    140
    13
    128
    Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA
    49.4
    87.8
    211
    83
    129
    Sioux City, IA-NE-SD
    49.2
    73.3
    129
    0
    130
    Jefferson City, MO
    49.2
    76.9
    80
    -50
    131
    Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI
    48.8
    60.2
    239
    108
    132
    South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI
    48.6
    135.7
    210
    78
    133
    Bangor, ME NECTA
    48.1
    64.6
    166
    33
    134
    Kokomo, IN
    47.8
    41.6
    133
    -1
    135
    Waco, TX
    47.6
    104.4
    37
    -98
    136
    Yuba City, CA
    47.3
    37.5
    218
    82
    137
    Jackson, MI
    47.2
    54.6
    238
    101
    138
    Wheeling, WV-OH
    46.0
    66.7
    25
    -113
    139
    Macon, GA
    45.9
    96.6
    171
    32
    140
    Idaho Falls, ID
    45.6
    48.7
    134
    -6
    141
    Lewiston, ID-WA
    45.5
    26.0
    189
    48
    142
    Johnstown, PA
    45.4
    60.0
    44
    -98
    143
    Athens-Clarke County, GA
    45.4
    84.1
    89
    -54
    144
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    45.1
    136.2
    63
    -81
    145
    St. George, UT
    44.9
    46.3
    199
    54
    146
    Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL
    44.8
    55.1
    88
    -58
    147
    Rockford, IL
    44.2
    146.8
    190
    20
    148
    Pascagoula, MS
    44.1
    56.1
    7
    -141
    149
    Bloomington-Normal, IL
    43.9
    89.8
    97
    -52
    150
    Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA
    43.7
    117.5
    160
    10
    151
    New Bedford, MA NECTA
    42.8
    64.8
    57
    -94
    152
    Topeka, KS
    42.5
    106.9
    118
    -34
    153
    Abilene, TX
    42.5
    64.7
    106
    -47
    154
    Battle Creek, MI
    42.1
    56.0
    128
    -26
    155
    Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH
    42.0
    114.3
    181
    26
    156
    Manhattan, KS
    41.9
    54.5
    6
    157
    Hot Springs, AR
    41.7
    36.9
    100
    -57
    158
    Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, MA  NECTA Division
    41.6
    87.2
    58
    -100
    159
    Lawton, OK
    41.2
    42.4
    13
    -146
    160
    Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA
    40.9
    43.6
    131
    -29
    161
    Anderson, IN
    40.6
    39.7
    175
    14
    162
    Eau Claire, WI
    40.1
    79.3
    46
    -116
    163
    Redding, CA
    40.1
    58.1
    216
    53
    164
    Billings, MT
    39.3
    76.6
    93
    -71
    165
    Fond du Lac, WI
    39.2
    45.2
    188
    23
    166
    Rochester, MN
    39.0
    101.0
    127
    -39
    167
    Lima, OH
    38.8
    52.5
    201
    34
    168
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    38.7
    93.2
    91
    -77
    169
    Hattiesburg, MS
    37.9
    58.6
    62
    -107
    170
    Alexandria, LA
    37.9
    62.6
    113
    -57
    171
    Pocatello, ID
    37.6
    36.2
    208
    37
    172
    Spartanburg, SC
    37.4
    118.0
    141
    -31
    173
    Savannah, GA
    37.3
    149.6
    126
    -8
    174
    Muncie, IN
    37.2
    50.1
    193
    19
    175
    Great Falls, MT
    36.9
    34.2
    48
    -127
    176
    Ithaca, NY
    36.7
    62.7
    26
    -150
    177
    Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI
    36.3
    85.0
    174
    -3
    178
    Bloomington, IN
    36.1
    81.2
    92
    -86
    179
    Wilmington, NC
    35.5
    134.3
    132
    -47
    180
    Flint, MI
    35.3
    136.6
    237
    57
    181
    Bremerton-Silverdale, WA
    35.3
    81.8
    177
    -4
    182
    Lawrence, KS
    34.5
    50.3
    165
    -17
    183
    Elmira, NY
    34.4
    39.0
    68
    -115
    184
    Salem, OR
    34.2
    141.0
    164
    -43
    185
    Danville, IL
    33.7
    29.2
    225
    40
    186
    Valdosta, GA
    33.1
    52.1
    183
    -3
    187
    Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH
    33.1
    69.2
    194
    7
    188
    Lake Charles, LA
    32.6
    88.2
    162
    -26
    189
    San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA
    32.1
    96.0
    195
    6
    190
    Dothan, AL
    31.7
    57.7
    242
    52
    191
    Pittsfield, MA NECTA
    31.6
    34.9
    81
    -110
    192
    Missoula, MT
    31.4
    53.8
    152
    -40
    193
    Mansfield, OH
    31.2
    52.5
    232
    39
    194
    Gainesville, FL
    30.8
    125.9
    154
    -40
    195
    Visalia-Porterville, CA
    29.5
    104.5
    196
    1
    196
    Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ
    29.4
    135.2
    213
    17
    197
    Bend, OR
    29.1
    60.1
    220
    23
    198
    Jackson, TN
    28.9
    58.3
    185
    -13
    199
    Medford, OR
    28.6
    75.1
    197
    -2
    200
    Gadsden, AL
    28.6
    35.6
    180
    -20
    201
    Lynchburg, VA
    27.8
    102.1
    144
    -57
    202
    Ocala, FL
    27.2
    90.9
    227
    25
    203
    Port St. Lucie, FL
    26.9
    120.5
    182
    -21
    204
    Racine, WI
    26.5
    74.8
    184
    -20
    205
    Nashua, NH-MA  NECTA Division
    26.4
    124.0
    192
    -13
    206
    Madera-Chowchilla, CA
    26.4
    31.8
    172
    -34
    207
    Norwich-New London, CT-RI NECTA
    26.3
    125.7
    163
    -44
    208
    Flagstaff, AZ
    26.2
    59.0
    76
    -132
    209
    Modesto, CA
    25.9
    142.5
    148
    20
    210
    Wausau, WI
    25.8
    66.5
    217
    7
    211
    Michigan City-La Porte, IN
    25.4
    42.3
    214
    3
    212
    Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ
    24.5
    45.6
    226
    14
    213
    Duluth, MN-WI
    24.1
    125.9
    112
    -101
    214
    Chico, CA
    23.3
    67.8
    146
    -68
    215
    Waterbury, CT NECTA
    23.3
    62.5
    202
    -13
    216
    Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO-IL
    22.7
    43.3
    147
    -69
    217
    Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC
    21.7
    142.9
    235
    -1
    218
    Wichita Falls, TX
    20.7
    57.8
    169
    -49
    219
    Terre Haute, IN
    20.6
    69.7
    137
    -82
    220
    Prescott, AZ
    20.5
    53.3
    229
    9
    221
    Cleveland, TN
    20.3
    38.5
    176
    -45
    222
    Sumter, SC
    20.0
    36.7
    156
    -66
    223
    Longview, WA
    19.2
    35.0
    212
    -11
    224
    Yuma, AZ
    19.1
    49.1
    221
    -3
    225
    Leominster-Fitchburg-Gardner, MA NECTA
    18.3
    47.2
    116
    -109
    226
    Anderson, SC
    18.1
    58.2
    130
    -96
    227
    Eugene-Springfield, OR
    17.8
    138.7
    230
    -11
    228
    Pine Bluff, AR
    17.3
    36.6
    243
    15
    229
    Brunswick, GA
    17.2
    39.2
    223
    -6
    230
    Anniston-Oxford, AL
    15.8
    47.7
    215
    -15
    231
    Fort Smith, AR-OK
    13.6
    110.2
    153
    -78
    232
    Kalamazoo-Portage, MI
    13.3
    133.7
    187
    -45
    233
    Rome, GA
    13.2
    37.1
    231
    -2
    234
    Rocky Mount, NC
    12.4
    59.6
    200
    -34
    235
    Sheboygan, WI
    11.1
    57.2
    219
    -16
    236
    Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV
    10.3
    43.1
    233
    -3
    237
    Monroe, MI
    9.3
    37.0
    234
    -3
    238
    Albany, GA
    7.0
    59.3
    207
    -31
    239
    Champaign-Urbana, IL
    6.0
    103.4
    136
    -103
    240
    Carson City, NV
    5.1
    27.7
    222
    -18
    241
    Janesville, WI
    4.4
    60.0
    241
    0
    242
    Morristown, TN
    2.8
    43.6
    236
    -6
    243
    Dalton, GA
    0.5
    62.8
    240
    -3