Tag: Best Cities 2015

  • The Cities Winning The Battle For Information Jobs 2015

    We are supposed to be moving rapidly into the “information era,” but the future, as science fiction author William Gibson suggested, is not “evenly distributed.” For most of the U.S., the boomlet in software, Internet publishing, search and other “disruptive” cyber companies has hardly been a windfall in terms of employment. As jobs in those areas have been created, employment has shriveled in old media like newspaper, magazine and book publishing (these industries lost a net 172,000 jobs from 2009 through 2014). In the 52 largest metropolitan areas that we studied, information employment declined for roughly half from 2009 through 2014. Overall, in information industries (a sprawling sector that also includes movie and TV production, radio and another big job loser, telecom) employment has shrunken 4.2% since 2009 to 2.7 million jobs, while total nonfarm employment in the U.S. grew by 5.1%.

    Yet looking at the information sector give us an important picture of how these changes have shifted jobs to certain regions and away from others. Our rankings are based on employment growth in the sector over the short-, medium- and long-term, going back to 2003, and factor in momentum — whether growth is slowing or accelerating. (For a detailed description of our methodology, click here.)

    By far the biggest winners in the information sweepstakes are areas that developed a strong engineering base before the rise of the Internet. This has provided the platform for the rapid growth of web-based businesses, including in fields such as entertainment, media, hospitality and transportation (like Uber). It’s not surprising then that the metro areas that have posted the strongest information job growth over the past 11 years are San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara and San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco.

    The growth in these hot spots has been nothing short of spectacular: information employment rose 60.2% from 2009 through 2014 in the San Jose area to 70,900 jobs, 6.9% of total employment in the metro area, while the San Francisco area has seen a 51.3% surge over the same time span to 55,800 jobs, representing 5.4% of the total workforce there.

    After the dot-com bubble burst, Silicon Valley tech employment declined consistently until 2010, since which the rebound has been dramatic. While San Francisco and areas in the northern end of Silicon Valley have not yet reached the peak employment levels seen during the bubble era, the southern end centered in San Jose and Santa Clara has easily outstripped its peaks of the early 2000s. And with information employment continuing to surge, it’s too early to say these areas have hit their “information” peak. Last year, the number of information jobs jumped 16.0% in San Jose while San Francisco experienced an 8.3% jump.

    Other traditional tech centers that have thrived in the new era include No. 9 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, Wash., where information employment has grown a healthy 9.2% since 2009 and No. 14 Boston, where employment is up 5.1% since 2009. Compared to the Bay Area, these regions appear less at the center of the web-based media and services industries, but their overall tech economies remain very strong.

    The Rise Of Sun Belt Information Hubs

    Some of the most rapid growth in information, however, is taking place not in the older established tech hotbeds but in the lower-cost metropolitan areas of the Sun Belt. Five of our top 10 ranked metropolitan areas are located in the belt that stretches from the Atlantic coast to Arizona, led by No. 3 Austin-Round Rock, Texas, where information employment has risen 30.8% since 2009 to 25,800 positions.

    Some of this reflects a gradual movement of companies, notably from Silicon Valley, to the Texas capital. Smaller Bay Area firms such as digital advertising firm Marin Software have expanded there while Apple is expected to add 3,600 jobs there over the next few years.

    Several other Sun Belt tech hubs also are high on our list. In fourth place is Raleigh, N.C., on the strength of a 13.8% jump in information employment since 2009. It’s followed in fifth place by No. 5 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C., which boasts significant sources of venture capital, and No. 8 San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas, which has seen the rise of locally based companies such as Execupay as well as large scale expansion of Bay Area firms such as Oracle that are flocking to the region.

    One big advantage these economies have compared to the ultra-pricey Bay Area is lower home costs, something that matters to tech workers as they enter their 30s. But the biggest challenge for some of these up and coming areas, such as Phoenix, is the dearth of large locally headquartered companies that can help create a management talent base and some tech street cred.

    The Battle Of The Bigs

    One key battleground for information supremacy is in the country’s media centers. The clear winner has been No. 7 New York, which has recorded a 13.0% jump in information jobs since 2009 to 185,200 jobs – second most in the country behind the Los Angeles metro area. That came amid an 11.8% decline over the same timespan in all publishing jobs not involving the Internet (note that we don’t have the level of detail at the local level to separate out software publishing from that figure, but it’s safe to assume the bulk of the decline was in newspapers and book and magazine publishing). The 13% jump reflects strength in new media as well as motion pictures, TV and radio, more so than technology, a field in which New York remains very much an also ran, right in the middle of the pack in terms of creating STEM and tech employment. But boosters claim this is changing, pointing out that there are now 7,000 tech firms employing 100,000 people in the area.

    Although New York is well behind the Bay Area in pace of growth, it is clearly outperforming its traditional media rivals in the rush towards digital media. Its growth dwarfs that of No. 29 Chicago, where information employment has ticked up 0.4% since 2009. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale metro area, still home to the largest number of information workers, has managed lackluster growth of 3.5% since 2009, including a 2.0% decline last year, which puts it 28th place on our list. For all the talk about L.A.’s emergence as a new media rival to the Bay Area, the numbers suggest this is more hope than reality. Over the past five years motion picture and television employment has not been hard-hit like traditional publishing but is only experiencing slow growth. No Facebook, Google or Apple equivalent has emerged in Southern California, although some hold out hope for L.A.-based Snapchat.

    A decade or two ago there was talk about the nation’s capital challenging New York’s media dominance. But as has become evident over the past year, the Beltway’s appeal is dropping, even when it comes to producing sound-bites and punditry. The core Washington D.C.-Arlington-Alexandria metropolitan division places a mediocre 43rd, with a 3.9% decline in information employment since 2009. Other areas around the capital did poorly also, including 41st-ranked Northern Virginia and 46th-place Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville Md. which also have lost information jobs since 2009.

    Surprises And Up And Comers

    Generally speaking manufacturing, energy and logistics-oriented economies do not do well in terms of information jobs. As of now there’s no Rust Belt version of Facebook or Google, and most factory towns do very poorly. But there’s one outstanding exception to this rule: Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, Mich., which places 10th on our list. This area, sometimes referred to “automation alley,” is Michigan’s premier tech region. It is where software meets heavy metal, with a plethora of companies focusing on factory software and new computer-controlled systems for automobiles. It is home to engineering software firms like Altair, which has been expanding rapidly, and also where General Motors recently announced plans for a $1 billion tech center, employing 2,600 salaried workers.

    If we are looking for future information hubs, one place to look would be our small and mid-sized metro area lists. Here the top ranks are dominated by college towns, including Baton Rouge, La., home to Louisiana State University, where information employment has surged 28.6% since 2009. It places third on our mid-size cities list, which also features such high-flying college towns as fourth place Provo-Orem, Utah (Brigham Young), No. 5 Durham-Chapel Hill (Duke, University of North Carolina), No. 6 Madison (University of Wisconsin), and No. 7 Ann Arbor (University of Michigan).

    The information sector may not be a big job generator, but it does play a critical role in several of our most important economies, including the San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles and Austin metro areas. The clear shift we are seeing towards consolidation of media with tech – a la Apple, Netflix and Google — will likely underpin a movement of these coveted jobs from traditional media centers to the Bay. But  given the unfriendly business atmosphere in California, and the super-high prices for houses, it also makes sense to look at secondary information centers, both in the Sun Belt and among college towns, which may attract even more of these jobs in the years ahead.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com and Roger Hobbs Distinguished Fellow in Urban Studies at Chapman University, and a member of the editorial board of the Orange County Register. He is also executive director of the Houston-based Center for Opportunity Urbanism. His newest book, The New Class Conflict is now available at Amazon and Telos Press. He is also author of The City: A Global History and The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050.  He lives in Los Angeles, CA.

    Michael Shires, Ph.D. is a professor at Pepperdine University School of Public Policy.

  • All Cities Information Jobs – 2015 Best Cities Rankings

    Read about how we selected the 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

    We used five measures of growth to rank MSAs over the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the new Office of Management and Budget definitions of MSAs for all series released after March 2015. As a result, the MSA listed in this year’s rankings do not necessary correspond directly to those listed in prior years. In some instances, MSAs were consolidated with others — for example Pascagoula, MS, was combined with the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS, MSA to form the new Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, MSA. Others were separated from previously consolidated MSAs and in still other instances individual counties were shifted from one MSA to another. The bottom line is that this year’s rankings are based on good time series for the newly defined MSAs but may not be precisely comparable to those listed in prior years. The total number of MSAs included in this year’s rankings has risen from 398 to 421. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment.

    2015 MSA Info Ranking – Overall  Area 2015 Weighted INDEX 2014 Nonfarm Emplymt (1000s) 2014 Info Emplymt Total Information Emplymt Cum Growth 2009-2014 2015 MSA Size Group 2014  Info Overall Ranking
    1 Janesville-Beloit, WI 99.3              66.8       1.8 63.6% S 1
    2 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 98.2        1,031.5     70.9 60.2% L 3
    3 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Met Div 97.2        1,034.2     55.8 51.3% L 8
    4 Savannah, GA 96.6            168.1       2.0 28.3% M 230
    5 Rochester, MN 94.3            114.9       2.0 27.1% S 12
    6 Tallahassee, FL 93.5            176.3       3.9 23.2% M 64
    7 Baton Rouge, LA 93.5            399.8       6.0 28.6% M 21
    8 Provo-Orem, UT 92.1            219.7     10.2 30.1% M 5
    9 Austin-Round Rock, TX 91.9            924.9     25.8 30.8% L 6
    10 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 89.6            294.2       4.2 17.8% M 29
    11 Madison, WI 89.5            386.9     14.8 36.1% M 14
    12 Ann Arbor, MI 89.4            211.3       5.0 26.1% M 74
    13 Logan, UT-ID 88.8              58.3       0.9 28.6% S 4
    14 College Station-Bryan, TX 87.5            106.1       1.4 27.3% S 17
    15 Raleigh, NC 86.1            571.5     19.0 13.8% L 33
    16 Laredo, TX 85.6            100.2       0.7 16.7% S 10
    17 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 85.3        1,085.8     25.1 12.7% L 42
    18 Jackson, MS 85.1            273.3       5.3 19.4% M 77
    19 Cheyenne, WY 84.7              47.1       1.2 9.1% S 43
    20 Fond du Lac, WI 84.6              48.3       1.0 11.1% S 13
    21 Wilmington, NC 82.6            117.1       2.8 0.0% S 79
    22 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 81.1        1,900.0     34.6 25.2% L 15
    23 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA 80.3            180.0       4.5 32.4% M 16
    24 Springfield, MO 79.4            204.8       4.3 7.6% M 124
    25 New York City, NY 79.1        4,165.9   185.2 13.0% L 18
    26 Victoria, TX 78.9              45.5       0.5 0.0% S 107
    27 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 78.7            960.3     21.8 17.0% L 27
    28 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 78.6              95.1       1.7 13.3% S 49
    29 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Met Div 78.4        1,575.6     91.8 9.2% L 32
    30 Portsmouth, NH-ME NECTA 78.3              83.6       2.4 5.9% S 19
    31 Bloomington, IN 78.3              77.0       1.4 0.0% S 86
    32 Bend-Redmond, OR 77.9              70.3       1.5 7.1% S 52
    33 Flint, MI 77.8            142.3       4.1 32.6% S 2
    34 Sheboygan, WI 77.3              60.9       0.3 0.0% S 271
    35 Lincoln, NE 77.1            185.7       2.6 13.0% M 48
    36 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Met Div 76.2        1,182.7     20.7 7.1% L 58
    37 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 76.1            247.9       2.3 9.5% M 71
    38 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV 76.1            896.8     10.3 11.2% L 84
    39 El Paso, TX 75.9            296.7       5.9 16.4% M 38
    40 Huntsville, AL 75.6            217.9       2.7 14.1% M 22
    41 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 75.5        2,551.7     88.3 12.7% L 40
    42 Abilene, TX 75.5              69.2       1.2 9.1% S 9
    43 Rapid City, SD 75.3              65.0       1.0 0.0% S 262
    44 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 75.2            324.3       5.3 2.6% M 30
    45 Lawrence-Methuen Town-Salem, MA-NH NECTA Div 75.1              79.2       1.6 33.3% S  
    46 Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury Town, MA-NH NECTA Div 74.6              62.8       0.4 0.0% S 95
    47 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 74.1        1,090.5     24.1 5.9% L 37
    48 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA 74.0            409.4     11.4 10.0% M 20
    49 Clarksville, TN-KY 73.7              88.2       1.2 20.7% S 76
    50 Columbus, IN 73.7              51.8       0.5 25.0% S 78
    51 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, CA 73.4            111.1       1.4 16.7% S 11
    52 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Div 72.7        1,742.0     55.9 5.1% L 25
    53 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Met Div 72.6            796.1     19.0 15.6% L 39
    54 Tyler, TX 71.8            100.2       2.3 11.1% S 24
    55 Napa, CA 71.6              69.5       0.6 5.6% S 209
    56 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 71.1        1,135.7     24.5 2.5% L 68
    57 Bay City, MI 71.0              37.4       0.5 0.0% S 62
    58 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Met Div 70.8            576.2     10.2 13.0% L 75
    59 Champaign-Urbana, IL 70.3            108.7       2.6 -7.2% S 26
    60 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 70.1        1,006.9     16.8 6.3% L 36
    61 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 70.1            228.2       3.2 6.7% M 35
    62 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 70.0            295.6       5.5 5.1% M 146
    63 Salt Lake City, UT 69.8            666.2     18.5 12.6% L 31
    64 Winston-Salem, NC 69.8            255.2       2.3 0.0% M 121
    65 Pocatello, ID 69.8              35.2       0.4 0.0% S 184
    66 Green Bay, WI 69.6            173.6       2.1 1.6% M 221
    67 Peabody-Salem-Beverly, MA NECTA Div 67.7              96.2       1.3 30.0% S 162
    68 Port St. Lucie, FL 67.2            135.3       1.4 0.0% S 155
    69 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Met Div 67.0        1,114.8     19.2 7.1% L 139
    70 Fort Collins, CO 67.0            148.9       2.5 -2.6% S 122
    71 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 67.0            892.0     20.8 4.5% L 50
    72 Jackson, MI 66.7              55.9       0.4 0.0% S 317
    73 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 66.7            895.1     19.3 -0.3% L 218
    74 Spartanburg, SC 66.6            140.6       1.1 0.0% S  
    75 Tacoma-Lakewood, WA Met Div 66.4            293.5       2.9 0.0% M 67
    76 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Met Div 66.3        2,346.3     68.8 2.8% L 65
    77 Cleveland, TN 66.1              46.0       0.3 0.0% S 61
    78 Burlington, NC 65.8              60.9       0.5 0.0% S 83
    79 Fargo, ND-MN 65.4            140.2       3.3 -5.7% S 81
    80 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA 65.2            235.4       3.1 8.1% M 66
    81 Auburn-Opelika, AL 65.1              60.7       0.5 0.0% S 56
    82 Flagstaff, AZ 65.1              64.3       0.4 0.0% S 57
    83 Taunton-Middleborough-Norton, MA NECTA Div 64.8              58.7       1.3 0.0% S  
    84 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 64.5            642.4       9.4 0.0% L 90
    85 Walla Walla, WA 64.5              27.1       0.4 0.0% S  
    86 Knoxville, TN 64.3            382.8       5.8 3.0% M 69
    87 Gainesville, FL 64.2            135.2       1.6 0.0% S 196
    88 Lewiston, ID-WA 64.1              27.4       0.4 0.0% S 60
    89 Fresno, CA 63.5            319.2       3.9 1.7% M 163
    90 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 63.4            571.3     11.4 0.3% L 92
    91 Redding, CA 63.4              63.1       0.7 10.5% S 133
    92 Muskegon, MI 63.3              63.0       0.8 0.0% S 73
    93 Kokomo, IN 63.0              40.7       0.4 0.0% S 104
    94 St. Louis, MO-IL 63.0        1,314.3     29.0 -2.9% L 80
    95 Eugene, OR 62.9            149.7       3.4 -1.9% S 63
    96 Asheville, NC 62.9            181.4       1.9 -4.9% M 142
    97 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC 62.7            148.3       2.3 0.0% S  
    98 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 62.6            521.2       5.3 2.6% L 88
    99 Boise City, ID 62.6            284.2       4.4 -0.8% M 44
    100 Grants Pass, OR 62.4              24.5       0.3 0.0% S  
    101 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL 62.3            276.7       3.4 0.0% M 161
    102 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Met Div 61.4        4,295.6   197.6 3.5% L 34
    103 Bismarck, ND 61.4              74.0       1.0 3.6% S 205
    104 Santa Fe, NM 61.1              61.8       0.9 -12.9% S 125
    105 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 61.1            394.4       7.1 3.4% M 103
    106 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 61.0            354.0       6.2 6.3% M 93
    107 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY 60.8              41.6       0.7 0.0% S  
    108 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Met Div 60.7        3,597.7     71.3 0.4% L 114
    109 Prescott, AZ 60.5              60.9       0.6 0.0% S 82
    110 Dover-Durham, NH-ME NECTA 60.4              52.7       1.1 0.0% S  
    111 Anchorage, AK 60.3            177.7       4.5 -3.6% M 129
    112 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 60.2            138.1       1.2 -42.9% S 261
    113 Chico, CA 60.1              76.9       1.1 6.7% S 245
    114 Lexington-Fayette, KY 59.5            268.3       5.8 7.5% M 195
    115 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 59.0        1,364.0     43.8 -0.1% L 106
    116 Santa Rosa, CA 58.7            193.7       2.7 3.8% M 109
    117 Las Cruces, NM 58.7              71.1       0.9 8.0% S 54
    118 Decatur, AL 58.6              53.8       0.3 0.0% S 110
    119 Binghamton, NY 58.6            105.7       1.9 -3.4% S 45
    120 Sioux Falls, SD 58.4            146.5       2.7 -10.0% S 101
    121 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 57.8            566.2       8.4 29.4% L 47
    122 Columbia, SC 57.4            375.8       5.5 -3.0% M 118
    123 Bangor, ME NECTA 57.3              66.4       1.1 0.0% S 255
    124 Akron, OH 56.9            332.2       3.9 -5.6% M 108
    125 Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH NECTA Div 56.9            147.6       6.4 3.2% S 298
    126 Albany, OR 56.9              41.1       0.4 0.0% S  
    127 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 56.6              37.6       0.2 0.0% S 227
    128 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 56.0        1,903.7     39.6 -2.1% L 99
    129 Fairbanks, AK 55.8              37.5       0.5 0.0% S 214
    130 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 55.8            239.1       3.1 6.9% M 97
    131 Mobile, AL 55.6            174.8       2.0 -11.6% M 135
    132 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 55.5        2,973.6     32.7 -3.2% L 72
    133 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 55.4            486.6     11.1 -2.9% M 147
    134 Terre Haute, IN 55.3              70.8       0.7 0.0% S 134
    135 St. George, UT 54.8              54.6       0.7 0.0% S 115
    136 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 53.9            225.6       2.8 7.7% M 7
    137 Yuba City, CA 53.4              40.5       0.4 -14.3% S 130
    138 Wichita Falls, TX 53.2              58.5       1.1 -8.3% S 157
    139 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ 53.2            845.9     17.5 -3.7% L  
    140 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 53.0            137.6       1.8 0.0% S 137
    141 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 52.9            556.7       7.6 -5.4% L 168
    142 Elgin, IL Met Div 52.6            249.9       3.7 -11.9% M  
    143 Chattanooga, TN-GA 52.6            242.1       2.9 -23.0% M 201
    144 San Rafael, CA Met Div 52.5            113.0       2.6 36.8% S  
    145 Texarkana, TX-AR 52.4              59.1       0.5 -16.7% S 145
    146 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 52.1        1,224.2     25.7 -2.4% L 149
    147 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 51.8        1,372.3     24.8 -4.6% L 217
    148 Philadelphia City, PA 51.6            684.3     11.5 -7.0% L 169
    149 Madera, CA 51.5              36.5       0.4 -14.3% S 94
    150 Charlottesville, VA 51.5            112.2       2.1 0.0% S  
    151 Lawton, OK 51.4              45.4       0.5 -16.7% S 132
    152 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 51.2              48.4       0.6 0.0% S 46
    153 Pueblo, CO 51.2              60.6       0.7 -12.5% S 96
    154 Montgomery, AL 51.1            170.3       2.2 1.6% M 117
    155 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 51.1        1,047.8     13.5 -5.4% L 112
    156 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL 51.0            136.2       1.5 -6.3% S 105
    157 Boulder, CO 51.0            178.3       8.2 -6.5% M 144
    158 Columbus, OH 50.5        1,028.2     17.0 1.6% L 28
    159 Altoona, PA 50.4              61.1       0.8 -7.4% S 113
    160 Northern Virginia, VA 50.2        1,388.0     41.3 -4.1% L 210
    161 Burlington-South Burlington, VT NECTA 50.0            124.2       2.3 -11.5% S 187
    162 Jackson, TN 49.9              65.6       0.6 -10.0% S 263
    163 Corpus Christi, TX 49.0            196.6       2.1 -8.7% M 152
    164 Greenville, NC 49.0              78.4       0.9 -10.0% S 51
    165 Corvallis, OR 48.7              40.3       0.7 -22.2% S 304
    166 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN 48.7              77.2       1.1 0.0% S 138
    167 Gary, IN Met Div 48.6            276.5       2.1 -10.1% M 98
    168 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 48.4            622.5       6.1 -7.1% L 182
    169 Visalia-Porterville, CA 48.2            116.6       0.9 -18.2% S 294
    170 Grand Forks, ND-MN 48.1              58.0       0.6 -10.0% S 150
    171 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Met Div 47.9        2,560.7     63.0 -3.9% L 198
    172 Canton-Massillon, OH 47.8            172.2       1.7 -15.0% M 191
    173 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 47.6            227.8       1.9 -12.3% M 208
    174 Stockton-Lodi, CA 47.6            212.1       2.1 -3.1% M 274
    175 Saginaw, MI 47.4              88.7       1.3 0.0% S 53
    176 Charleston, WV 47.3            123.3       1.7 -15.0% S 206
    177 Dothan, AL 47.3              57.3       0.7 -12.5% S 180
    178 Kankakee, IL 47.3              45.2       0.5 -17.6% S 154
    179 Worcester, MA-CT NECTA 47.3            277.1       3.4 0.0% M 55
    180 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 47.2            168.8       1.5 -6.3% M 248
    181 Framingham, MA NECTA Div 47.1            171.0       5.3 -5.9% M 188
    182 Pittsburgh, PA 47.1        1,164.6     18.3 -6.3% L 151
    183 Kansas City, KS 47.0            458.8     15.1 -8.3% M 189
    184 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 46.7            205.5       1.6 -10.9% M 258
    185 Camden, NJ Met Div 46.6            515.3       7.2 -6.9% L 272
    186 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Met Div 46.6            576.2     13.4 -8.4% L 226
    187 Olympia-Tumwater, WA 46.5            108.9       0.9 -6.9% S  
    188 Utica-Rome, NY 46.4            127.8       1.8 -19.7% S 316
    189 Nashua, NH-MA NECTA Div 46.3            125.4       1.9 -6.7% S 215
    190 Rochester, NY 46.1            527.8       8.9 -8.9% L 249
    191 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 46.1            568.7     10.1 -9.0% L 216
    192 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 45.8            199.8       1.9 -25.3% M 291
    193 Urban Honolulu, HI 45.6            467.2       7.2 -0.9% M 148
    194 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 45.6            122.2       2.0 -10.4% S 70
    195 Cedar Rapids, IA 45.4            140.5       4.7 -4.1% S 140
    196 Racine, WI 45.3              76.0       0.4 -7.7% S 181
    197 Delaware County, PA 44.6            232.4       2.6 -12.4% M  
    198 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 44.5            147.2       0.9 0.0% S 41
    199 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 43.9            103.4       2.2 -4.3% S 171
    200 Kennewick-Richland, WA 43.8            104.6       0.8 -11.1% S  
    201 Colorado Springs, CO 43.8            263.9       6.8 -3.3% M 199
    202 Johnson City, TN 43.7              78.6       1.5 -22.0% S 278
    203 Columbus, GA-AL 43.6            123.2       1.6 -11.3% S 251
    204 Greensboro-High Point, NC 43.6            354.7       5.0 -10.2% M 268
    205 Jacksonville, FL 43.6            633.5       9.1 -11.1% L 172
    206 Springfield, MA-CT NECTA 43.3            324.0       3.7 -7.5% M 59
    207 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 43.0            234.7       2.1 -4.5% M 143
    208 Odessa, TX 42.7              81.7       0.5 -16.7% S 225
    209 Wichita, KS 42.6            294.5       4.5 -18.2% M 270
    210 Eau Claire, WI 42.3              85.3       0.9 -10.0% S 213
    211 Longview, TX 42.2            105.4       1.4 -10.9% S 128
    212 Manchester, NH NECTA 42.0            108.6       3.0 -9.1% S 123
    213 Amarillo, TX 41.9            117.4       1.4 -12.5% S 204
    214 Tuscaloosa, AL 41.7            104.4       0.8 -17.2% S 247
    215 Lancaster, PA 41.6            240.5       3.1 -13.1% M 224
    216 Toledo, OH 41.6            298.3       3.1 -1.1% M 136
    217 Waterbury, CT NECTA 41.4              68.4       0.7 -8.7% S 200
    218 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 41.3            141.5       1.3 -13.3% S  
    219 Lafayette, LA 40.7            221.8       2.9 -9.4% M 229
    220 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 40.7            845.7     14.4 -11.1% L 186
    221 Reno, NV 40.4            204.2       2.0 -16.7% M 296
    222 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 40.4            457.2       8.3 -10.1% M 197
    223 Elmira, NY 40.0              39.6       0.4 -20.0% S 183
    224 Pittsfield, MA NECTA 39.8              41.4       0.6 -5.6% S 222
    225 Reading, PA 39.3            176.7       1.3 -4.9% M 244
    226 Albuquerque, NM 39.3            380.3       7.8 -15.9% M 243
    227 Punta Gorda, FL 39.3              44.6       0.4 -14.3% S 240
    228 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Met Div 39.3        1,524.2     23.9 -7.3% L 102
    229 Yuma, AZ 39.2              52.7       0.5 -6.3% S 100
    230 Bakersfield, CA 39.2            261.7       2.3 -13.6% M 165
    231 Cleveland-Elyria, OH 38.7        1,038.2     14.5 -9.9% L 170
    232 Dutchess County-Putnam County, NY Met Div 38.7            142.4       1.9 -14.9% S  
    233 Topeka, KS 38.6            111.6       1.5 -25.0% S 299
    234 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 38.6              60.2       0.5 -11.8% S 279
    235 Leominster-Gardner, MA NECTA 37.8              50.4       0.4 -20.0% S 309
    236 Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead, MA NECTA Div 37.8              45.2       1.0 -12.1% S  
    237 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Met Div 37.6        1,081.5     21.3 -13.6% L 241
    238 Fort Wayne, IN 37.6            212.9       3.0 -8.2% M 153
    239 Muncie, IN 37.5              51.0       0.3 -25.0% S 178
    240 Richmond, VA 37.4            638.1       7.9 -17.8% L 236
    241 Barnstable Town, MA NECTA 37.3              97.6       1.5 -11.8% S 116
    242 Portland-South Portland, ME NECTA 37.2            193.8       3.1 -16.2% M 276
    243 Trenton, NJ 37.0            252.9       5.0 -18.0% M 159
    244 Kansas City, MO 36.8            571.7     14.5 -13.0% L 232
    245 Fort Smith, AR-OK 36.7            113.4       1.2 0.0% S 131
    246 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 36.3            183.0       2.4 -18.2% M 174
    247 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Met Div 36.2        1,024.8     20.6 -14.3% L  
    248 Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN 35.9            102.3       0.9 -10.0% S 23
    249 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 35.8              95.7       0.8 -14.3% S 267
    250 Lynchburg, VA 35.6            103.7       0.9 -18.2% S  
    251 Tulsa, OK 35.5            445.6       7.5 -11.4% M 239
    252 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL 35.2              46.3       0.6 -25.0% S 286
    253 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS 35.1            152.0       1.5 -6.3% M  
    254 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 35.1            130.4       1.1 -21.4% S 223
    255 Fayetteville, NC 34.7            128.6       1.4 -8.7% S 141
    256 St. Cloud, MN 34.6            107.0       1.6 -9.4% S 89
    257 Glens Falls, NY 34.3              53.6       0.9 -10.0% S 91
    258 Oklahoma City, OK 34.1            625.8       8.3 -18.6% L 295
    259 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 33.5            753.9     11.0 -13.9% L 233
    260 Syracuse, NY 33.4            318.1       4.5 -12.4% M 238
    261 Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, MA NECTA Div 33.4              80.8       0.6 -14.3% S 292
    262 Peoria, IL 32.9            178.0       2.2 -10.8% M 234
    263 Newark, NJ-PA Met Div 32.8        1,188.1     24.2 -13.3% L 231
    264 Springfield, IL 32.8            111.4       1.7 -19.0% S 297
    265 Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, HI 32.5              72.4       0.6 -25.0% S  
    266 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Met Div 32.4            734.4       7.0 -12.8% L 164
    267 Tucson, AZ 31.6            370.8       4.1 -8.9% M 185
    268 Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD 31.6            387.7       4.9 -2.0% M 228
    269 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 31.4            226.2       1.9 -20.8% M 293
    270 Modesto, CA 31.0            163.0       0.9 -25.0% M 308
    271 Johnstown, PA 30.3              57.8       0.7 -12.5% S 246
    272 Casper, WY 30.2              43.2       0.4 -20.0% S 173
    273 Duluth, MN-WI 29.6            134.0       1.4 -20.4% S 175
    274 York-Hanover, PA 29.4            180.1       1.7 -17.7% M 119
    275 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 28.4            330.1       4.5 -22.0% M 207
    276 Salisbury, MD-DE 28.3            142.3       1.2 -21.7% S  
    277 Gadsden, AL 28.3              37.6       0.3 -40.0% S 120
    278 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 28.1        1,319.1     11.1 -20.7% L 193
    279 Dayton, OH 28.0            374.5       8.4 -21.5% M 284
    280 Decatur, IL 27.9              50.8       0.6 -21.7% S 289
    281 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Met Div 27.9            993.0     13.0 -14.9% L 219
    282 Idaho Falls, ID 27.3              60.2       0.9 -30.8% S 256
    283 Baltimore City, MD 26.9            365.1       3.6 -12.1% M 282
    284 Roanoke, VA 26.9            161.4       1.7 -15.0% M 269
    285 Kingston, NY 26.6              60.9       0.9 -10.0% S 167
    286 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 26.6            347.8       6.7 -14.9% M 242
    287 Danville, IL 26.4              29.3       0.2 -33.3% S 306
    288 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 26.2            184.6       2.6 -21.2% M 273
    289 Merced, CA 26.1              64.5       0.4 -33.3% S 252
    290 Wausau, WI 26.0              71.6       0.4 -29.4% S 300
    291 Salem, OR 25.9            151.5       1.0 -23.1% M 288
    292 Lubbock, TX 25.1            138.6       3.8 -16.8% S 235
    293 Ocala, FL 24.4              98.3       0.8 -25.0% S 290
    294 El Centro, CA 24.3              54.9       0.3 -25.0% S 158
    295 Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Met Div 24.3            399.2       3.6 -18.2% M 260
    296 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY 23.9            688.8     13.2 -16.8% L  
    297 Ithaca, NY 23.8              70.6       0.4 -20.0% S 111
    298 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 23.7            516.4       8.2 -16.9% L 202
    299 Waco, TX 23.5            112.4       1.2 -16.3% S 192
    300 Owensboro, KY 23.5              52.6       0.4 -20.0% S 264
    301 Sherman-Denison, TX 23.0              45.6       0.4 -20.0% S 85
    302 Rockford, IL 23.0            150.9       1.4 -22.2% M 315
    303 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Met Div 22.8        1,292.3     21.4 -18.7% L 177
    304 Appleton, WI 22.6            122.1       1.5 -27.4% S 275
    305 Salinas, CA 22.5            132.8       1.4 -17.6% S 254
    306 Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, PA 22.5            262.5       3.7 -29.9% M 305
    307 Killeen-Temple, TX 22.4            136.2       1.8 -23.6% S 126
    308 Grand Junction, CO 22.1              61.9       0.7 -22.2% S 127
    309 Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ 21.9              34.7       0.3 -50.0% S  
    310 Evansville, IN-KY 21.7            157.9       1.8 -24.3% M 280
    311 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 20.8              56.4       0.4 -29.4% S 285
    312 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 20.2            345.7       6.6 -20.9% M 281
    313 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 20.2            166.6       2.2 -27.5% M 250
    314 Midland, TX 19.7              98.6       0.9 -25.0% S 311
    315 Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA 19.5            902.1     13.6 -24.0% L 259
    316 Panama City, FL 18.6              78.4       1.1 -31.3% S 287
    317 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 18.1            141.0       0.9 -34.1% S 302
    318 Coeur d’Alene, ID 18.1              58.3       0.6 -29.2% S 160
    319 Greeley, CO 17.7            101.5       0.7 -28.6% S 277
    320 Medford, OR 16.7              82.0       1.3 -23.5% S 257
    321 Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Met Div 16.6            352.1       4.1 -23.3% M 283
    322 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 15.9            183.5       2.0 -52.0% M 179
    323 Bloomington, IL 15.8              94.4       0.7 -22.2% S 301
    324 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 15.3            124.5       0.5 -21.1% S 176
    325 New Haven, CT NECTA 13.3            282.4       4.0 -32.2% M 314
    326 Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ 12.5              56.6       0.5 -42.3% S 203
    327 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 10.7              46.6       0.6 -30.8% S 312
    328 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 10.3            130.6       0.7 -30.0% S 212
    329 Erie, PA 10.1            130.6       1.2 -29.4% S 310
    330 San Angelo, TX 8.2              49.3       0.8 -34.2% S 313
    331 Dover, DE 7.3              68.0       0.4 -33.3% S 194
    332 Norwich-New London-Westerly, CT-RI NECTA 7.2            127.5       1.1 -32.7% S 266
    333 Lewiston-Auburn, ME NECTA 6.6              50.6       0.5 -34.8% S 303
    334 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 5.1            103.4       0.9 -32.5% S 307
    335 New Bedford, MA NECTA 4.2              66.3       0.4 -42.9% S 220
    336 Morristown, TN 3.9              44.2       0.3 -40.0% S 265
  • Large Cities Information Jobs – 2015 Best Cities Rankings

    Read about how we selected the 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

    We used five measures of growth to rank MSAs over the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the new Office of Management and Budget definitions of MSAs for all series released after March 2015. As a result, the MSA listed in this year’s rankings do not necessary correspond directly to those listed in prior years. In some instances, MSAs were consolidated with others — for example Pascagoula, MS, was combined with the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS, MSA to form the new Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, MSA. Others were separated from previously consolidated MSAs and in still other instances individual counties were shifted from one MSA to another. The bottom line is that this year’s rankings are based on good time series for the newly defined MSAs but may not be precisely comparable to those listed in prior years. The total number of MSAs included in this year’s rankings has risen from 398 to 421. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment.

    2014 MSA Info  Ranking – LARGE MSAs Area 2015 Weighted INDEX 2014 Nonfarm Emplymt (1000s) 2014 Info Emplymt Total Information Emplymt Cum Growth 2009-2014 2015  Change from 2014 – Large MSAs
    1 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 98.2   1,031.5    70.9 60.2% 0
    2 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Met Div 97.2   1,034.2    55.8 51.3% 1
    3 Austin-Round Rock, TX 91.9      924.9    25.8 30.8% (1)
    4 Raleigh, NC 86.1      571.5    19.0 13.8% 7
    5 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 85.3   1,085.8    25.1 12.7% 12
    6 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 81.1   1,900.0    34.6 25.2% (2)
    7 New York City, NY 79.1   4,165.9  185.2 13.0% (2)
    8 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 78.7      960.3    21.8 17.0% (1)
    9 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Met Div 78.4   1,575.6    91.8 9.2% 1
    10 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Met Div 76.2   1,182.7    20.7 7.1% 10
    11 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV 76.1      896.8    10.3 11.2% 15
    12 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 75.5   2,551.7    88.3 12.7% 4
    13 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 74.1   1,090.5    24.1 5.9% 1
    14 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Div 72.7   1,742.0    55.9 5.1% (8)
    15 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Met Div 72.6      796.1    19.0 15.6% 0
    16 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 71.1   1,135.7    24.5 2.5% 6
    17 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Met Div 70.8      576.2    10.2 13.0% 7
    18 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 70.1   1,006.9    16.8 6.3% (5)
    19 Salt Lake City, UT 69.8      666.2    18.5 12.6% (10)
    20 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Met Div 67.0   1,114.8    19.2 7.1% 14
    21 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 67.0      892.0    20.8 4.5% (2)
    22 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 66.7      895.1    19.3 -0.3% 32
    23 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Met Div 66.3   2,346.3    68.8 2.8% (2)
    24 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 64.5      642.4       9.4 0.0% 3
    25 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 63.4      571.3    11.4 0.3% 3
    26 St. Louis, MO-IL 63.0   1,314.3    29.0 -2.9% (1)
    27 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 62.6      521.2       5.3 2.6% (4)
    28 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Met Div 61.4   4,295.6  197.6 3.5% (16)
    29 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Met Div 60.7   3,597.7    71.3 0.4% 4
    30 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 59.0   1,364.0    43.8 -0.1% 1
    31 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 57.8      566.2       8.4 29.4% (13)
    32 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 56.0   1,903.7    39.6 -2.1% (3)
    33 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 55.5   2,973.6    32.7 -3.2% (10)
    34 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ 53.2      845.9    17.5 -3.7% not ranked
    35 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 52.9      556.7       7.6 -5.4% 5
    36 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 52.1   1,224.2    25.7 -2.4% 1
    37 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 51.8   1,372.3    24.8 -4.6% 16
    38 Philadelphia City, PA 51.6      684.3    11.5 -7.0% 3
    39 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 51.1   1,047.8    13.5 -5.4% (7)
    40 Columbus, OH 50.5   1,028.2    17.0 1.6% (32)
    41 Northern Virginia, VA 50.2   1,388.0    41.3 -4.1% 10
    42 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 48.4      622.5       6.1 -7.1% 3
    43 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Met Div 47.9   2,560.7    63.0 -3.9% 6
    44 Pittsburgh, PA 47.1   1,164.6    18.3 -6.3% (6)
    45 Camden, NJ Met Div 46.6      515.3       7.2 -6.9% 20
    46 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Met Div 46.6      576.2    13.4 -8.4% 10
    47 Rochester, NY 46.1      527.8       8.9 -8.9% 16
    48 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 46.1      568.7    10.1 -9.0% 4
    49 Jacksonville, FL 43.6      633.5       9.1 -11.1% (6)
    50 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 40.7      845.7    14.4 -11.1% (4)
    51 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Met Div 39.3   1,524.2    23.9 -7.3% (21)
    52 Cleveland-Elyria, OH 38.7   1,038.2    14.5 -9.9% (10)
    53 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Met Div 37.6   1,081.5    21.3 -13.6% 9
    54 Richmond, VA 37.4      638.1       7.9 -17.8% 6
    55 Kansas City, MO 36.8      571.7    14.5 -13.0% 3
    56 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Met Div 36.2   1,024.8    20.6 -14.3% not ranked
    57 Oklahoma City, OK 34.1      625.8       8.3 -18.6% 9
    58 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 33.5      753.9    11.0 -13.9% 1
    59 Newark, NJ-PA Met Div 32.8   1,188.1    24.2 -13.3% (2)
    60 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Met Div 32.4      734.4       7.0 -12.8% (21)
    61 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 28.1   1,319.1    11.1 -20.7% (13)
    62 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Met Div 27.9      993.0    13.0 -14.9% (7)
    63 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY 23.9      688.8    13.2 -16.8% not ranked
    64 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 23.7      516.4       8.2 -16.9% (14)
    65 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Met Div 22.8   1,292.3    21.4 -18.7% (21)
    66 Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA 19.5      902.1    13.6 -24.0% (2)
  • Mid Sized Cities Information Jobs – 2015 Best Cities Rankings

    Read about how we selected the 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

    We used five measures of growth to rank MSAs over the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the new Office of Management and Budget definitions of MSAs for all series released after March 2015. As a result, the MSA listed in this year’s rankings do not necessary correspond directly to those listed in prior years. In some instances, MSAs were consolidated with others — for example Pascagoula, MS, was combined with the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS, MSA to form the new Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, MSA. Others were separated from previously consolidated MSAs and in still other instances individual counties were shifted from one MSA to another. The bottom line is that this year’s rankings are based on good time series for the newly defined MSAs but may not be precisely comparable to those listed in prior years. The total number of MSAs included in this year’s rankings has risen from 398 to 421. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment.

    2014 MSA Info  Ranking – Midsized MSAs Area 2015 Weighted INDEX 2014 Nonfarm Emplymt (1000s) 2014 Info Emplymt Total Information Emplymt Cum Growth 2009-2014 2015  Change from 2014 – Midsized MSAs
    1 Savannah, GA 96.6       168.1      2.0 28.3% 63
    2 Tallahassee, FL 93.5       176.3      3.9 23.2% 14
    3 Baton Rouge, LA 93.5       399.8      6.0 28.6% 3
    4 Provo-Orem, UT 92.1       219.7   10.2 30.1% (3)
    5 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 89.6       294.2      4.2 17.8% 3
    6 Madison, WI 89.5       386.9   14.8 36.1% (3)
    7 Ann Arbor, MI 89.4       211.3      5.0 26.1% 14
    8 Jackson, MS 85.1       273.3      5.3 19.4% 14
    9 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA 80.3       180.0      4.5 32.4% (5)
    10 Springfield, MO 79.4       204.8      4.3 7.6% 24
    11 Lincoln, NE 77.1       185.7      2.6 13.0% 2
    12 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 76.1       247.9      2.3 9.5% 8
    13 El Paso, TX 75.9       296.7      5.9 16.4% (2)
    14 Huntsville, AL 75.6       217.9      2.7 14.1% (7)
    15 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 75.2       324.3      5.3 2.6% (6)
    16 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA 74.0       409.4   11.4 10.0% (11)
    17 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 70.1       228.2      3.2 6.7% (7)
    18 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 70.0       295.6      5.5 5.1% 23
    19 Winston-Salem, NC 69.8       255.2      2.3 0.0% 14
    20 Green Bay, WI 69.6       173.6      2.1 1.6% 40
    21 Tacoma-Lakewood, WA Met Div 66.4       293.5      2.9 0.0% (3)
    22 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA 65.2       235.4      3.1 8.1% (5)
    23 Knoxville, TN 64.3       382.8      5.8 3.0% (4)
    24 Fresno, CA 63.5       319.2      3.9 1.7% 22
    25 Asheville, NC 62.9       181.4      1.9 -4.9% 13
    26 Boise City, ID 62.6       284.2      4.4 -0.8% (14)
    27 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL 62.3       276.7      3.4 0.0% 18
    28 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 61.1       394.4      7.1 3.4% (1)
    29 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 61.0       354.0      6.2 6.3% (5)
    30 Anchorage, AK 60.3       177.7      4.5 -3.6% 5
    31 Lexington-Fayette, KY 59.5       268.3      5.8 7.5% 23
    32 Santa Rosa, CA 58.7       193.7      2.7 3.8% (3)
    33 Columbia, SC 57.4       375.8      5.5 -3.0% (2)
    34 Akron, OH 56.9       332.2      3.9 -5.6% (6)
    35 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 55.8       239.1      3.1 6.9% (10)
    36 Mobile, AL 55.6       174.8      2.0 -11.6% 0
    37 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 55.4       486.6   11.1 -2.9% (2)
    38 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 53.9       225.6      2.8 7.7% (36)
    39 Elgin, IL Met Div 52.6       249.9      3.7 -11.9% not ranked
    40 Chattanooga, TN-GA 52.6       242.1      2.9 -23.0% 17
    41 Montgomery, AL 51.1       170.3      2.2 1.6% (11)
    42 Boulder, CO 51.0       178.3      8.2 -6.5% (2)
    43 Corpus Christi, TX 49.0       196.6      2.1 -8.7% (1)
    44 Gary, IN Met Div 48.6       276.5      2.1 -10.1% (18)
    45 Canton-Massillon, OH 47.8       172.2      1.7 -15.0% 8
    46 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 47.6       227.8      1.9 -12.3% 13
    47 Stockton-Lodi, CA 47.6       212.1      2.1 -3.1% 33
    48 Worcester, MA-CT NECTA 47.3       277.1      3.4 0.0% (34)
    49 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 47.2       168.8      1.5 -6.3% 22
    50 Framingham, MA NECTA Div 47.1       171.0      5.3 -5.9% 1
    51 Kansas City, KS 47.0       458.8   15.1 -8.3% 1
    52 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 46.7       205.5      1.6 -10.9% 22
    53 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 45.8       199.8      1.9 -25.3% 34
    54 Urban Honolulu, HI 45.6       467.2      7.2 -0.9% (18)
    55 Delaware County, PA 44.6       232.4      2.6 -12.4% not ranked
    56 Colorado Springs, CO 43.8       263.9      6.8 -3.3% 0
    57 Greensboro-High Point, NC 43.6       354.7      5.0 -10.2% 19
    58 Springfield, MA-CT NECTA 43.3       324.0      3.7 -7.5% (43)
    59 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 43.0       234.7      2.1 -4.5% (20)
    60 Wichita, KS 42.6       294.5      4.5 -18.2% 18
    61 Lancaster, PA 41.6       240.5      3.1 -13.1% 0
    62 Toledo, OH 41.6       298.3      3.1 -1.1% (25)
    63 Lafayette, LA 40.7       221.8      2.9 -9.4% 0
    64 Reno, NV 40.4       204.2      2.0 -16.7% 25
    65 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 40.4       457.2      8.3 -10.1% (10)
    66 Reading, PA 39.3       176.7      1.3 -4.9% 4
    67 Albuquerque, NM 39.3       380.3      7.8 -15.9% 2
    68 Bakersfield, CA 39.2       261.7      2.3 -13.6% (21)
    69 Fort Wayne, IN 37.6       212.9      3.0 -8.2% (26)
    70 Portland-South Portland, ME NECTA 37.2       193.8      3.1 -16.2% 11
    71 Trenton, NJ 37.0       252.9      5.0 -18.0% (27)
    72 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 36.3       183.0      2.4 -18.2% (24)
    73 Tulsa, OK 35.5       445.6      7.5 -11.4% (6)
    74 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS 35.1       152.0      1.5 -6.3% not ranked
    75 Syracuse, NY 33.4       318.1      4.5 -12.4% (9)
    76 Peoria, IL 32.9       178.0      2.2 -10.8% (11)
    77 Tucson, AZ 31.6       370.8      4.1 -8.9% (27)
    78 Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD 31.6       387.7      4.9 -2.0% (16)
    79 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 31.4       226.2      1.9 -20.8% 9
    80 Modesto, CA 31.0       163.0      0.9 -25.0% 11
    81 York-Hanover, PA 29.4       180.1      1.7 -17.7% (49)
    82 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 28.4       330.1      4.5 -22.0% (24)
    83 Dayton, OH 28.0       374.5      8.4 -21.5% 3
    84 Baltimore City, MD 26.9       365.1      3.6 -12.1% 0
    85 Roanoke, VA 26.9       161.4      1.7 -15.0% (8)
    86 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 26.6       347.8      6.7 -14.9% (18)
    87 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 26.2       184.6      2.6 -21.2% (8)
    88 Salem, OR 25.9       151.5      1.0 -23.1% 49
    89 Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Met Div 24.3       399.2      3.6 -18.2% (14)
    90 Rockford, IL 23.0       150.9      1.4 -22.2% 68
    91 Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, PA 22.5       262.5      3.7 -29.9% (1)
    92 Evansville, IN-KY 21.7       157.9      1.8 -24.3% (10)
    93 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 20.2       345.7      6.6 -20.9% (10)
    94 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 20.2       166.6      2.2 -27.5% (22)
    95 Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Met Div 16.6       352.1      4.1 -23.3% (10)
    96 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 15.9       183.5      2.0 -52.0% (47)
    97 New Haven, CT NECTA 13.3       282.4      4.0 -32.2% (5)
  • Small Cities Information Jobs – 2015 Best Cities Rankings

    Read about how we selected the 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

    We used five measures of growth to rank MSAs over the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the new Office of Management and Budget definitions of MSAs for all series released after March 2015. As a result, the MSA listed in this year’s rankings do not necessary correspond directly to those listed in prior years. In some instances, MSAs were consolidated with others — for example Pascagoula, MS, was combined with the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS, MSA to form the new Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, MSA. Others were separated from previously consolidated MSAs and in still other instances individual counties were shifted from one MSA to another. The bottom line is that this year’s rankings are based on good time series for the newly defined MSAs but may not be precisely comparable to those listed in prior years. The total number of MSAs included in this year’s rankings has risen from 398 to 421. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment.

    2014 MSA Info  Ranking – SMALL MSAs Area 2015 Weighted INDEX 2014 Nonfarm Emplymt (1000s) 2014 Info Emplymt Total Information Emplymt Cum Growth 2009-2014 2014 Info Rank Within Size
    1 Janesville-Beloit, WI 99.3        66.8     1.8 63.6% 1
    2 Rochester, MN 94.3     114.9     2.0 27.1% 7
    3 Logan, UT-ID 88.8        58.3     0.9 28.6% 3
    4 College Station-Bryan, TX 87.5     106.1     1.4 27.3% 9
    5 Laredo, TX 85.6     100.2     0.7 16.7% 5
    6 Cheyenne, WY 84.7        47.1     1.2 9.1% 15
    7 Fond du Lac, WI 84.6        48.3     1.0 11.1% 8
    8 Wilmington, NC 82.6     117.1     2.8 0.0% 33
    9 Victoria, TX 78.9        45.5     0.5 0.0% 49
    10 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 78.6        95.1     1.7 13.3% 18
    11 Portsmouth, NH-ME NECTA 78.3        83.6     2.4 5.9% 10
    12 Bloomington, IN 78.3        77.0     1.4 0.0% 38
    13 Bend-Redmond, OR 77.9        70.3     1.5 7.1% 20
    14 Flint, MI 77.8     142.3     4.1 32.6% 2
    15 Sheboygan, WI 77.3        60.9     0.3 0.0% 129
    16 Abilene, TX 75.5        69.2     1.2 9.1% 4
    17 Rapid City, SD 75.3        65.0     1.0 0.0% 123
    18 Lawrence-Methuen Town-Salem, MA-NH NECTA Div 75.1        79.2     1.6 33.3%  
    19 Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury Town, MA-NH NECTA Div 74.6        62.8     0.4 0.0% 43
    20 Clarksville, TN-KY 73.7        88.2     1.2 20.7% 31
    21 Columbus, IN 73.7        51.8     0.5 25.0% 32
    22 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, CA 73.4     111.1     1.4 16.7% 6
    23 Tyler, TX 71.8     100.2     2.3 11.1% 12
    24 Napa, CA 71.6        69.5     0.6 5.6% 100
    25 Bay City, MI 71.0        37.4     0.5 0.0% 27
    26 Champaign-Urbana, IL 70.3     108.7     2.6 -7.2% 13
    27 Pocatello, ID 69.8        35.2     0.4 0.0% 90
    28 Peabody-Salem-Beverly, MA NECTA Div 67.7        96.2     1.3 30.0% 79
    29 Port St. Lucie, FL 67.2     135.3     1.4 0.0% 74
    30 Fort Collins, CO 67.0     148.9     2.5 -2.6% 56
    31 Jackson, MI 66.7        55.9     0.4 0.0% 160
    32 Spartanburg, SC 66.6     140.6     1.1 0.0%  
    33 Cleveland, TN 66.1        46.0     0.3 0.0% 26
    34 Burlington, NC 65.8        60.9     0.5 0.0% 36
    35 Fargo, ND-MN 65.4     140.2     3.3 -5.7% 34
    36 Auburn-Opelika, AL 65.1        60.7     0.5 0.0% 23
    37 Flagstaff, AZ 65.1        64.3     0.4 0.0% 24
    38 Taunton-Middleborough-Norton, MA NECTA Div 64.8        58.7     1.3 0.0%  
    39 Walla Walla, WA 64.5        27.1     0.4 0.0%  
    40 Gainesville, FL 64.2     135.2     1.6 0.0% 94
    41 Lewiston, ID-WA 64.1        27.4     0.4 0.0% 25
    42 Redding, CA 63.4        63.1     0.7 10.5% 65
    43 Muskegon, MI 63.3        63.0     0.8 0.0% 30
    44 Kokomo, IN 63.0        40.7     0.4 0.0% 47
    45 Eugene, OR 62.9     149.7     3.4 -1.9% 28
    46 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC 62.7     148.3     2.3 0.0%  
    47 Grants Pass, OR 62.4        24.5     0.3 0.0%  
    48 Bismarck, ND 61.4        74.0     1.0 3.6% 98
    49 Santa Fe, NM 61.1        61.8     0.9 -12.9% 58
    50 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY 60.8        41.6     0.7 0.0%  
    51 Prescott, AZ 60.5        60.9     0.6 0.0% 35
    52 Dover-Durham, NH-ME NECTA 60.4        52.7     1.1 0.0%  
    53 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 60.2     138.1     1.2 -42.9% 122
    54 Chico, CA 60.1        76.9     1.1 6.7% 113
    55 Las Cruces, NM 58.7        71.1     0.9 8.0% 22
    56 Decatur, AL 58.6        53.8     0.3 0.0% 50
    57 Binghamton, NY 58.6     105.7     1.9 -3.4% 16
    58 Sioux Falls, SD 58.4     146.5     2.7 -10.0% 46
    59 Bangor, ME NECTA 57.3        66.4     1.1 0.0% 119
    60 Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH NECTA Div 56.9     147.6     6.4 3.2% 143
    61 Albany, OR 56.9        41.1     0.4 0.0%  
    62 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 56.6        37.6     0.2 0.0% 110
    63 Fairbanks, AK 55.8        37.5     0.5 0.0% 104
    64 Terre Haute, IN 55.3        70.8     0.7 0.0% 66
    65 St. George, UT 54.8        54.6     0.7 0.0% 53
    66 Yuba City, CA 53.4        40.5     0.4 -14.3% 62
    67 Wichita Falls, TX 53.2        58.5     1.1 -8.3% 76
    68 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 53.0     137.6     1.8 0.0% 67
    69 San Rafael, CA Met. Div 52.5     113.0     2.6 36.8%  
    70 Texarkana, TX-AR 52.4        59.1     0.5 -16.7% 71
    71 Madera, CA 51.5        36.5     0.4 -14.3% 42
    72 Charlottesville, VA 51.5     112.2     2.1 0.0%  
    73 Lawton, OK 51.4        45.4     0.5 -16.7% 64
    74 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 51.2        48.4     0.6 0.0% 17
    75 Pueblo, CO 51.2        60.6     0.7 -12.5% 44
    76 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL 51.0     136.2     1.5 -6.3% 48
    77 Altoona, PA 50.4        61.1     0.8 -7.4% 52
    78 Burlington-South Burlington, VT NECTA 50.0     124.2     2.3 -11.5% 91
    79 Jackson, TN 49.9        65.6     0.6 -10.0% 124
    80 Greenville, NC 49.0        78.4     0.9 -10.0% 19
    81 Corvallis, OR 48.7        40.3     0.7 -22.2% 149
    82 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN 48.7        77.2     1.1 0.0% 68
    83 Visalia-Porterville, CA 48.2     116.6     0.9 -18.2% 141
    84 Grand Forks, ND-MN 48.1        58.0     0.6 -10.0% 72
    85 Saginaw, MI 47.4        88.7     1.3 0.0% 21
    86 Charleston, WV 47.3     123.3     1.7 -15.0% 99
    87 Dothan, AL 47.3        57.3     0.7 -12.5% 87
    88 Kankakee, IL 47.3        45.2     0.5 -17.6% 73
    89 Olympia-Tumwater, WA 46.5     108.9     0.9 -6.9%  
    90 Utica-Rome, NY 46.4     127.8     1.8 -19.7% 159
    91 Nashua, NH-MA NECTA Div 46.3     125.4     1.9 -6.7% 105
    92 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 45.6     122.2     2.0 -10.4% 29
    93 Cedar Rapids, IA 45.4     140.5     4.7 -4.1% 69
    94 Racine, WI 45.3        76.0     0.4 -7.7% 88
    95 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 44.5     147.2     0.9 0.0% 14
    96 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 43.9     103.4     2.2 -4.3% 82
    97 Kennewick-Richland, WA 43.8     104.6     0.8 -11.1%  
    98 Johnson City, TN 43.7        78.6     1.5 -22.0% 132
    99 Columbus, GA-AL 43.6     123.2     1.6 -11.3% 116
    100 Odessa, TX 42.7        81.7     0.5 -16.7% 109
    101 Eau Claire, WI 42.3        85.3     0.9 -10.0% 103
    102 Longview, TX 42.2     105.4     1.4 -10.9% 61
    103 Manchester, NH NECTA 42.0     108.6     3.0 -9.1% 57
    104 Amarillo, TX 41.9     117.4     1.4 -12.5% 97
    105 Tuscaloosa, AL 41.7     104.4     0.8 -17.2% 115
    106 Waterbury, CT NECTA 41.4        68.4     0.7 -8.7% 95
    107 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 41.3     141.5     1.3 -13.3%  
    108 Elmira, NY 40.0        39.6     0.4 -20.0% 89
    109 Pittsfield, MA NECTA 39.8        41.4     0.6 -5.6% 107
    110 Punta Gorda, FL 39.3        44.6     0.4 -14.3% 112
    111 Yuma, AZ 39.2        52.7     0.5 -6.3% 45
    112 Dutchess County-Putnam County, NY Met. Div 38.7     142.4     1.9 -14.9%  
    113 Topeka, KS 38.6     111.6     1.5 -25.0% 144
    114 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 38.6        60.2     0.5 -11.8% 133
    115 Leominster-Gardner, MA NECTA 37.8        50.4     0.4 -20.0% 152
    116 Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead, MA NECTA Div 37.8        45.2     1.0 -12.1%  
    117 Muncie, IN 37.5        51.0     0.3 -25.0% 86
    118 Barnstable Town, MA NECTA 37.3        97.6     1.5 -11.8% 54
    119 Fort Smith, AR-OK 36.7     113.4     1.2 0.0% 63
    120 Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN 35.9     102.3     0.9 -10.0% 11
    121 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 35.8        95.7     0.8 -14.3% 128
    122 Lynchburg, VA 35.6     103.7     0.9 -18.2%  
    123 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL 35.2        46.3     0.6 -25.0% 135
    124 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 35.1     130.4     1.1 -21.4% 108
    125 Fayetteville, NC 34.7     128.6     1.4 -8.7% 70
    126 St. Cloud, MN 34.6     107.0     1.6 -9.4% 40
    127 Glens Falls, NY 34.3        53.6     0.9 -10.0% 41
    128 Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, MA NECTA Div 33.4        80.8     0.6 -14.3% 140
    129 Springfield, IL 32.8     111.4     1.7 -19.0% 142
    130 Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, HI 32.5        72.4     0.6 -25.0%  
    131 Johnstown, PA 30.3        57.8     0.7 -12.5% 114
    132 Casper, WY 30.2        43.2     0.4 -20.0% 83
    133 Duluth, MN-WI 29.6     134.0     1.4 -20.4% 84
    134 Salisbury, MD-DE 28.3     142.3     1.2 -21.7%  
    135 Gadsden, AL 28.3        37.6     0.3 -40.0% 55
    136 Decatur, IL 27.9        50.8     0.6 -21.7% 138
    137 Idaho Falls, ID 27.3        60.2     0.9 -30.8% 120
    138 Kingston, NY 26.6        60.9     0.9 -10.0% 81
    139 Danville, IL 26.4        29.3     0.2 -33.3% 150
    140 Merced, CA 26.1        64.5     0.4 -33.3% 117
    141 Wausau, WI 26.0        71.6     0.4 -29.4% 145
    142 Lubbock, TX 25.1     138.6     3.8 -16.8% 111
    143 Ocala, FL 24.4        98.3     0.8 -25.0% 139
    144 El Centro, CA 24.3        54.9     0.3 -25.0% 77
    145 Ithaca, NY 23.8        70.6     0.4 -20.0% 51
    146 Waco, TX 23.5     112.4     1.2 -16.3% 92
    147 Owensboro, KY 23.5        52.6     0.4 -20.0% 125
    148 Sherman-Denison, TX 23.0        45.6     0.4 -20.0% 37
    149 Appleton, WI 22.6     122.1     1.5 -27.4% 130
    150 Salinas, CA 22.5     132.8     1.4 -17.6% 118
    151 Killeen-Temple, TX 22.4     136.2     1.8 -23.6% 59
    152 Grand Junction, CO 22.1        61.9     0.7 -22.2% 60
    153 Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ 21.9        34.7     0.3 -50.0%  
    154 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 20.8        56.4     0.4 -29.4% 134
    155 Midland, TX 19.7        98.6     0.9 -25.0% 154
    156 Panama City, FL 18.6        78.4     1.1 -31.3% 136
    157 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 18.1     141.0     0.9 -34.1% 147
    158 Coeur d’Alene, ID 18.1        58.3     0.6 -29.2% 78
    159 Greeley, CO 17.7     101.5     0.7 -28.6% 131
    160 Medford, OR 16.7        82.0     1.3 -23.5% 121
    161 Bloomington, IL 15.8        94.4     0.7 -22.2% 146
    162 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 15.3     124.5     0.5 -21.1% 85
    163 Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ 12.5        56.6     0.5 -42.3% 96
    164 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 10.7        46.6     0.6 -30.8% 155
    165 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 10.3     130.6     0.7 -30.0% 102
    166 Erie, PA 10.1     130.6     1.2 -29.4% 153
    167 San Angelo, TX 8.2        49.3     0.8 -34.2% 156
    168 Dover, DE 7.3        68.0     0.4 -33.3% 93
    169 Norwich-New London-Westerly, CT-RI NECTA 7.2     127.5     1.1 -32.7% 127
    170 Lewiston-Auburn, ME NECTA 6.6        50.6     0.5 -34.8% 148
    171 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 5.1     103.4     0.9 -32.5% 151
    172 New Bedford, MA NECTA 4.2        66.3     0.4 -42.9% 106
    173 Morristown, TN 3.9        44.2     0.3 -40.0% 126
  • Smaller Stars: The Best Small And Medium-Size Cities For Jobs 2015

    A look at job growth in America’s small and medium-size cities provides a very different, perhaps more intimate portrait of the ground-level economy across a wider swathe of the country than our survey last week of The Best Big Cities For Jobs. It takes us to many states that lack large cities, particularly in the Midwest and South. In contrast to our big city list, information technology is a driving factor in only a handful of smaller metro areas – grittier sectors like energy and manufacturing are the livelihood of a good many, as well as tourism for a surprisingly large number of thriving places that have become vacation meccas for the increasing number of affluent residents of major urban areas.

    The 421 metropolitan statistical areas we evaluated in our rankings, ranging from large to small, account for 87.6% of all U.S. nonfarm employment.  Of them, the country’s small MSAs (those with less than 150,000 nonfarm jobs) and medium-sized ones (between 150,000 and 450,000 nonfarm jobs) account for just over a third of U.S. urban employment.  Job creation in these communities since 2000 has been roughly comparable to the nation’s larger metro areas — total nonfarm employment has increased 7.5% in small and medium-size MSAs compared to 7.8% for large ones.

    Our rankings are based on employment growth over the short-, medium- and long-term, going back to 2003, and factor in momentum — whether growth is slowing or accelerating. (For a detailed description of our methodology, click here.)

    The Slipstream Economies

    A good number of our top-ranked smaller cities are posting strong job growth in the slipstream of larger economies. This is clearly the case with our top-ranked medium-size metro area, Provo-Orem, and its northern Utah neighbor, No. 7 Ogden-Clearfield. Both are located along the Wasatch Front not far from the somewhat bright lights of Salt Lake City (and more importantly its airport) and are heavily Mormon. Provo is home to Brigham Young University, the academic center of the Mormon universe with over 29,000 students. That group’s social cohesion, which translates into a high percentage of families with children, as well as emphasis on education and enterprise, underlay the success of these areas.

    But what is most striking about these two metro areas is the diversity of their economic growth. Since 2009, for example, employment in the Provo-Orem area is up 23.5%, with gains in virtually every sector, paced by increases in construction and natural resources (60%), information (30.1%), business services (46.5%) and even manufacturing (16.4%). With the exception of information jobs, Ogden has showed a similar, albeit less spectacular pattern of widespread economic growth over the same time period.

    Other slipstream economies that are thriving include our second-ranked small city. Greeley, Colo., slightly over an hour’s drive from the Denver airport. Greeley rose seven places from last year, powered largely by 114% employment growth since 2009 in construction and natural resources (oil and gas mostly) as well as solid expansions in business services (up 29.8%) and manufacturing (up 17.2%). As in the case of Provo and Ogden, Greeley benefits from being close to a dynamic large metro area, but can couple that with prized small town attributes like less traffic, good schools, relatively low housing prices and safe streets.

    Energy Hot Spots: Not All Cold Yet

    Until the recent tumble in energy prices, big oil towns reliably dominated our list. For all sorts of reasons, including fierce local opposition, big metro areas don’t tend to produce oil and natural gas, though the technical and business aspects are dominated by a few, notably Houston. The price plunge had not yet translated into heavy job losses in many energy towns by January 2015, which is as far as our data goes, although some clearly were already hurting.

    Take our top-ranked small city, Midland, and nearby No. 3-ranked Odessa, which are in the oil-rich Permian Basin of West Texas. Employment grew 9.1% in Midland last year, the fastest pace of any metro area in the country. Since 2009 the west Texas town has logged almost insane 45.8% expansion in its job base, with a large boost not only in natural resources and construction (108.4% growth), but also manufacturing (up 72.2%), wholesale trade (80.6%) , professional business services (up 40%) as well as leisure and hospitality (likely rooms for the roughnecks). Odessa boasts similar, albeit somewhat less gaudy numbers.

    But you don’t have to be in Texas to be an energy boomtown. Bakersfield, Calif., No. 6 on the medium-size list, has managed to retain a strong energy economy in a state that has all but declared war on fossil fuels. Bakersfield has been described as “little Texas,” and it has enjoyed strong, very un-Californian employment growth in such areas as manufacturing, up 17.8% since 2009, trade (19.8%) and natural resources and construction (40.8%). Blue collar employment may be suffering in much of California, but not down in this metro area, best known for country stars like Merle Haggard and highly resistant to the San Francisco-style economic post-industrial model that dominates the state.

    Yet there’s no question that there are problems in the oil patch. Some of the biggest decliners on our list from last year are big energy towns, such as Lafayette, La., which slid 43 places to 48th on the mid-size cities list, and Anchorage, Alaska, down 25 places to 63rd. On our small city list, Bismarck, N.D., a major hub for that state’s shale boom, dropped from second last year to 19th this year, and Houma-Thibodaux, La., tumbled 61 places to 81st.

    Playground Towns

    Looking across the country, however, many of the small cities doing the best are not those that produce anything tangible like energy or cars. There’s been a strong resurgence in what may be considered playgrounds for the expanding ranks of the affluent residents of major urban areas, particularly on the West Coast, where Silicon Valley is minting many millionaires along with its famous billionaires, as well as along the East Coast, where second home and retirement-oriented communities are booming. Last year, vacation home sales broke the national record.

    Among the playground areas that are prospering on our small cities are No. 4 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, Fla., where employment expanded 5.4% last year to 136,200 jobs, Napa, Calif. (eighth, with 15.6% job growth since 2009), and Redmond-Bend, Ore. (12th). On our mid-size list, Santa Rosa, Calif., (Sonoma County) ranks 12th and Santa Barbara- Santa Maria, Calif., 17th.

    In some of these places, not surprisingly, leisure and hospitality are the largest industry — 19.6% of the workforce in Naples is employed in this sector. Economist Bill Watkins, who has studied these trends in California and Oregon, suggests that the growth of the playground cities reflects the emergence of America’s haute bourgeoisie. “The well-to-do go to these places,” he notes, fueling both their growth and, in hard times, their sometimes sharp declines. “They have second homes and can spend a lot of money.” Watkins’ analysis of Bend, Ore.’s economy, for example, shows that upwards of 80% of the volatility in its economy can be traced to what is occurring in California, notably the Bay Area.

    Industrial Cities:Some Up, Some Down

    For generations manufacturing in the U.S. has been moving to smaller cities, largely in the South, while Midwestern and northeastern industrial cities have been taking it on the chin. With a modest growth in manufacturing, some small and mid-size cities have done surprisingly well, although many continue to lag, and even fall further in the rankings.

    Columbus, Ind., a manufacturing hub that is home to diesel engine maker Cummins, epitomizes the up and down nature of industrial economies. Right now Columbus, riding a new wave of investment from Cummins and other manufacturers, has risen to fifth on our small city list, and is at record high employment. Since 2009 the Indiana metro area’s job count has expanded 23.4% to 51,800, paced by an impressive 43.2% jump in manufacturing.

    Sadly, this is not the case for many manufacturing towns. As with the large city list, many of the bottom dwellers are old industrial centers. On the mid-size list, take  91st place Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, Ohio-Pa., where employment is down 6.6% from 2003, or No. 85 Toledo, Ohio, off 5.4% from 2003. Among small cities furniture manufacturing center Rocky Mount, N.C., fell to 255th, down 4.4% since 2009, while old steel center Weirton-Steubenville, W.V.-Ohio, dropped to 254th place, with employment down 12.7% since 2003.

    College Towns And The Future For Small Cities

    The future of small city America depends heavily on how these areas adjust to changing economic times. Given that manufacturing and agriculture are becoming less labor intensive, to stay competitive, smaller cities will need to move more aggressively into knowledge-based fields like software, medical services and higher-end business services. Mid-sized college towns like No. 1 Provo, Boulder, Colo. (14th), Lexington, Ky. (19th), and Madison, Wisc. (20th), have experienced steady growth.

    Diversification of the economy may be the best guide to future smaller city growth. Madison, for example, has a strong government and education employment base but also is home to growing number of technology firms, with information employment up an impressive 36.1% since 2009. Medical software maker Epic employs 6,800 at its sprawling campus in nearby Verona.

    But perhaps the best example of successful small city growth may be Fargo, N.D., a long time butt of sophisto jokes, which ranks sixth on our small metro area list. Fargo, which is also home to North Dakota State University, may not have the cool factor of San Francisco or even Madison, but its economy is extraordinarily balanced, and not nearly as energy-dependent as other North Dakotan cities like Bismarck or Williston. It has posted double-digit employment growth since 2009 in everything from construction and manufacturing to business services and hospitality.

    As many of America’s most prosperous metro areas become ever more expensive and highly regulated, notably in California and the Northeast, small-city America could enjoy a renaissance in coming years. But it will take determination on the part of local leaders and residents to begin expanding their economic strategy beyond any one niche, and instead develop a growth economy that can insulate themselves from the downturns that affect any single industry over time.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com and Roger Hobbs Distinguished Fellow in Urban Studies at Chapman University, and a member of the editorial board of the Orange County Register. He is also executive director of the Houston-based Center for Opportunity Urbanism. His newest book, The New Class Conflict is now available at Amazon and Telos Press. He is also author of The City: A Global History and The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050.  He lives in Los Angeles, CA.

    Michael Shires, Ph.D. is a professor at Pepperdine University School of Public Policy.

    Photo: “Provo Downtown Historic District” by Tricia SimpsonOwn work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons.

  • The Best Cities For Jobs 2015

    Since the U.S. economy imploded in 2008, there’s been a steady shift in leadership in job growth among our major metropolitan areas. In the earliest years, the cities that did the best were those on the East Coast that hosted the two prime beneficiaries of Washington’s resuscitation efforts, the financial industry and the federal bureaucracy. Then the baton was passed to metro areas riding the boom in the energy sector, which, if not totally dead in its tracks, is clearly weaker.

    Right now, job creation momentum is the strongest in tech-oriented metropolises and Sun Belt cities with lower costs, particularly the still robust economies of Texas.

    Topping our annual ranking of the best big cities for jobs are the main metro areas of Silicon Valley: the San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco Metropolitan Division, followed by San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, swapping their positions from last year.

    Our rankings are based on short-, medium- and long-term job creation, going back to 2003, and factor in momentum — whether growth is slowing or accelerating. We have compiled separate rankings for America’s 70 largest metropolitan statistical areas (those with nonfarm employment over 450,000), which are our focus this week, as well as medium-size metro areas (between 150,000 and 450,000 nonfarm jobs) and small ones (less than 150,000 nonfarm jobs) in order to make the comparisons more relevant to each category. (For a detailed description of our methodology, click here.)

    An Economy Fit For Geeks

    Venture capital and private-equity firms keep pouring money into U.S. technology companies, lured by the promise of huge IPO returns. Last year was the best for new stock offerings since the peak of the dot-com bubble, with 71 biotech IPOs and 55 tech IPOs. It’s continuing to fuel strong job creation in Silicon Valley. Employment expanded 4.8% in the San Francisco Metropolitan Division in 2014, which includes the job-rich suburban expanses of San Mateo to the south, and employment is up 21.2% since 2009. This has been paced by growth in professional business services jobs in the area, up 9% last year, and in information jobs, which includes many social media functions – information employment expanded 8.3% last year and is up 28.7% since 2011.

    San Jose which, like San Francisco, was devastated in the tech crash a decade ago, has also rebounded smartly. The San Jose MSA clocked 4.9% job growth last year and 20.0% since 2009. Employment in manufacturing, once the heart of the local economy, has grown 8% since 2011, after a decade of sharp reversals, but the number of information jobs there has exploded, up 16% last year and 35.7% since 2011.

    Meanwhile, there’s been a striking reversal of fortune in the greater Washington, D.C., area, while the greater New York area has also fallen off the pace. In the years after the crash, soaring federal spending pushed Washington-Arlington-Alexandria to as high as fifth on our annual list of the best cities for jobs; this year it’s a meager 47th, with job growth of 1.5% in 2014, following meager 0.2% growth in 2013, while Northern Virginia (50th) and Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville (64th) also lost ground, dropping, respectively, five and 15 places.

    Job growth has also slowed in the greater New York region, which also was an early star performer in the immediate aftermath of the recession, in part due to the bank bailout that consolidated financial institutions in their strongest home region. Virtually all the areas that make up greater New York have lost ground in our ranking: the New York City MSA has fallen to 17th place from seventh last year, as employment growth tailed off to 2.6% in 2014 from 3.2% in 2013. Meanwhile Nassau-Suffolk ranks 49th, Rockland-Westchester 60th and Newark is second from the bottom among the biggest metro areas in 69th place.

    The Shift To ‘Opportunity Cities’ Continues

    Not every tech hot spot has the Bay Area’s advantages, which include venture capital, the presence of the world’s top technology companies and a host of people with the know-how to start and grow companies.

    But other metro areas have something Silicon Valley lacks: affordable housing. Most of the rest of our top 15 metro areas have far lower home prices than the Bay Area, or for that matter Boston, Los Angeles or New York. And they also have experienced strong job growth, often across a wider array of industries, which provides opportunities for a broader portion of the population.

    The combination of lower prices and strong job opportunities are what earns them our label of “opportunity cities.” The Bay Area may attract many of the best and brightest, but it is too expensive for most. Despite the current boom, the area’s population growth has been quite modest — San Jose has had an average population growth rate of 1.5% over the past four years. In contrast, seven of our top 10 metro areas, including third place Dallas-Plano-Irving, Texas, and No. 4 Austin, Texas, are also in the top 10 in terms of population growth since 2000. If prices and costs are reasonable, people will go to places where work is most abundant.

    In the Dallas metro area, the job count grew 4.2% last year, paced by an 18.6% expansion in professional business services, while overall employment is up 15.7% since 2009. Job growth last year in Austin, Texas, was a healthy 3.9%, while the information sector expanded by 4.7% and since 2011 by 17.8%.

    Many Texas cities, of course, have benefited from the energy boom — the recent downturn in oil prices make it likely that growth, particularly in No. 6 Houston, will decelerate in coming years.

    But what is most remarkable about the top-performing cities is the diversity of their economies. Most have tech clusters, but several, such as Houston, Nashville, Tenn., Dallas and Charlotte, N.C., have growing manufacturing, trade, transportation and business services sectors. The immediate prognosis, however, may be brightest in places like Denver and Orlando, where growth is less tied to energy than business services, trade and tourism. Nashville, which places fifth on our list, has particularly bright prospects, due not only to its growing tech and manufacturing economy, but also its strong health care sector which, according to one recent study, contributes an overall economic benefit of nearly $30 billion annually and more than 210,000 jobs to the local economy.

    The Also-Rans

    Some economies lower in our rankings have made strong improvements, notably Atlanta-Sandy Spring-Roswell, which rose to 12th this year, a jump of 12 places. Long a star performer, the Georgia metro area stumbled through the housing bust, but it appears to have regained its footing, with strong job growth across a host of fields from manufacturing and information to health, and particularly business services, a category in which employment has increased 24% since 2009.

    In California, one big turnaround story has been the Riverside-San Bernardino area, which gained six places to rank 11th this year as it has again begun to benefit from migration caused by coastal Southern California’s impossibly high home prices.

    Several mid-American metro areas also are showing strong improvement. Louisville-Jefferson County, Ky., jumped fifteen places to 21st, propelled by strong growth in manufacturing, business services and finance. Kansas City, Kan. (23rd), and Kansas City, Mo. (46th), both made double-digit jumps in our rankings. In Michigan, Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, bolstered by the recovery of the auto industry, gained six places to 59th, while manufacturing hub Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills picked up two to 39th. These may not be high growth areas, but these metro area no longer consistently sit at the bottom of the list.

    Losing Ground

    One of the biggest resurgent stars in past rankings, New Orleans-Metairie, dropped 17 places to 43rd, while Oklahoma City fell 17 places to 33rd. These cities lack the economic diversity to withstand a long-term loss of energy jobs if the sector goes into a prolonged downturn.

    Yet perhaps the most troubling among the also-rans are the metro areas that have remained steadily at the bottom. These are largely Rust Belt cities such as last place Camden, N.J., which has been at or near that position for years.

    Future Prospects

    Now the best prospects appear to be in tech-heavy regions, but it’s important to recognize that a key contributor to the tech sector’s frenzy of venture capital and IPOs had been the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented monetary interventions, which are now phasing out. As it is, headwinds to expansion in the Bay Area are strong. High housing prices, according to recent study, may make it very difficult for these companies to expand their local workforces. The median price of houses in tech suburbs like Los Gatos now stand at nearly $2 million — rich for all but a few — while downtown Palo Alto office rents have risen an impossible 43% in the last five years.

    Companies like Google, which has run into opposition over its proposed new headquarters expansion, may choose to shift more employment to other tech centers, such as Austin, Denver, Seattle, Raleigh and Salt Lake City, where the cost of doing business tends to be less. Similarly the stronger dollar could erode the modest progress made by some industrial cities, such as Detroit and Warren, as it gives a strong advantage to foreign competitors.

    Normally we would expect these processes to play out slowly. But in these turbulent times, it’s best to keep an eye out for disruptive changes — a new economic cataclysm, should one occur, could quickly shift the playing field once again.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com and Roger Hobbs Distinguished Fellow in Urban Studies at Chapman University, and a member of the editorial board of the Orange County Register. He is also executive director of the Houston-based Center for Opportunity Urbanism. His newest book, The New Class Conflict is now available at Amazon and Telos Press. He is also author of The City: A Global History and The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050.  He lives in Los Angeles, CA.

    Michael Shires, Ph.D. is a professor at Pepperdine University School of Public Policy.

  • 2015 How We Pick the Best Cities for Job Growth

    The methodology for our 2015 ranking, which seeks to measure the robustness of metro areas’ growth both recently and over time, largely corresponds to that used in previous years, with a minor addition to mitigate the volatility that the Great Recession has introduced into the time series. It allows the rankings to include all of the metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) for which the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports monthly employment data. They are derived from three-month rolling averages of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics “state and area” unadjusted employment data reported from November 2003 to January 2015.

    The data reflect the North American Industry Classification System categories, including total nonfarm employment, manufacturing, financial services, business and professional services, educational and health services, information, retail and wholesale trade, transportation and utilities, leisure and hospitality, and government.

    We used five measures of growth to rank MSAs over the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the new Office of Management and Budget definitions of MSAs for all series released after March 2015. As a result, the MSA listed in this year’s rankings do not necessary correspond directly to those listed in prior years. In some instances, MSAs were consolidated with others — for example Pascagoula, MS, was combined with the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS, MSA to form the new Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, MSA. Others were separated from previously consolidated MSAs and in still other instances individual counties were shifted from one MSA to another. The bottom line is that this year’s rankings are based on good time series for the newly defined MSAs but may not be precisely comparable to those listed in prior years. The total number of MSAs included in this year’s rankings has risen from 398 to 421. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment.

    The index is calculated from a normalized, weighted summary of: 1) recent growth trend: the current and prior year’s employment growth rates, with the current year emphasized (two points); 2) mid-term growth: the average annual 2009-2014 growth rate (two points); 3) long-term momentum: the sum of the 2009-2014and 2003-2008 employment growth rates multiplied by the ratio of the 2003-2008 growth rate over the 2009-2014 growth rate (one point); 4) current year growth (one point); and 5) the average of each year’s growth rate, normalized annually, for the last 10 years (two points). This methodology corresponds exactly to that used in last year’s rankings. The goal of our methodology is to capture a snapshot of the present and prospective employment outlook in each MSA, and these revisions allow the reader to have a better sense of the employment climate in each.

  • All Cities Rankings – 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

    We used five measures of growth to rank MSAs over the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the new Office of Management and Budget definitions of MSAs for all series released after March 2015. As a result, the MSA listed in this year’s rankings do not necessary correspond directly to those listed in prior years. In some instances, MSAs were consolidated with others — for example Pascagoula, MS, was combined with the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS, MSA to form the new Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, MSA. Others were separated from previously consolidated MSAs and in still other instances individual counties were shifted from one MSA to another. The bottom line is that this year’s rankings are based on good time series for the newly defined MSAs but may not be precisely comparable to those listed in prior years. The total number of MSAs included in this year’s rankings has risen from 398 to 421. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment.

    2015 Overall Ranking Area 2015 Size 2015 Weighted INDEX  2014 Nonfarm Emplymt (1000s)  Overall Rank Change 2014 Overall Rank 
    1 Midland, TX S 100.0          98.6 9 10
    2 Greeley, CO S 99.8        101.5 7 9
    3 Odessa, TX S 99.7          81.7 20 23
    4 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Metro Div. L 97.5     1,034.2 -1 3
    5 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA L 97.2     1,031.5 -3 2
    6 Provo-Orem, UT M 97.1        219.7 1 7
    7 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL S 96.3        136.2 8 15
    8 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL M 96.0        239.1 17 25
    9 Columbus, IN S 93.0          51.8 29 38
    10 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metro Div. L 91.4     2,346.3 25 35
    11 Fargo, ND-MN S 91.2        140.2 21 32
    12 Austin-Round Rock, TX L 90.9        924.9 0 12
    13 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN L 90.8        892.0 11 24
    14 Auburn-Opelika, AL S 90.7          60.7 -3 11
    15 Napa, CA S 90.7          69.5 14 29
    16 Gainesville, GA S 90.5          82.0 64 80
    17 Ames, IA S 90.4          53.6 34 51
    18 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX L 90.2     2,973.6 -1 17
    19 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO L 89.6     1,364.0 17 36
    20 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO M 89.1        227.8 33 53
    21 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL L 88.8     1,135.7 10 31
    22 Merced, CA S 87.9          64.5 59 81
    23 Bend-Redmond, OR S 87.7          70.3 49 72
    24 Victoria, TX S 87.3          45.5 10 34
    25 Lake Charles, LA S 86.7        101.1 119 144
    26 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC L 86.2     1,085.8 22 48
    27 The Villages, FL S 85.9          26.1  
    28 Jonesboro, AR S 85.9          54.6 -6 22
    29 Elkhart-Goshen, IN S 85.0        124.5 -25 4
    30 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX L 84.9        960.3 10 40
    31 St. George, UT S 84.8          54.6 -23 8
    32 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL M 84.2        276.7 64 96
    33 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA L 83.9     1,319.1 23 56
    34 Savannah, GA M 83.8        168.1 29 63
    35 Bismarck, ND S 83.8          74.0 -34 1
    36 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA L 83.2     2,551.7 65 101
    37 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Div. L 82.8        993.0 0 37
    38 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metro Div. L 82.6     1,575.6 12 50
    39 Bakersfield, CA M 82.6        261.7 2 41
    40 Ogden-Clearfield, UT M 82.6        234.7 67 107
    41 Raleigh, NC L 82.5        571.5 -28 13
    42 Charleston-North Charleston, SC M 81.8        324.3 44 86
    43 Coeur d’Alene, ID S 81.7          58.3 17 60
    44 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metro Div. L 81.5     1,114.8 15 59
    45 New York City, NY L 80.9     4,165.9 -15 30
    46 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Metro Div. L 80.8        576.2 57 103
    47 Fort Collins, CO S 79.9        148.9 -19 28
    48 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC S 79.5        148.3 13 61
    49 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, CA S 79.5        111.1 38 87
    50 Salt Lake City, UT L 78.7        666.2 -7 43
    51 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Metro Div. L 78.2        796.1 57 108
    52 Winchester, VA-WV S 78.0          60.7 14 66
    53 Tuscaloosa, AL S 77.7        104.4 118 171
    54 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN L 77.4        642.4 101 155
    55 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA L 77.0     1,090.5 15 70
    56 Longview, WA S 77.0          39.4 168 224
    57 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC M 77.0        394.4 16 73
    58 Port St. Lucie, FL S 76.6        135.3 51 109
    59 Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Beaufort, SC S 76.5          72.0  
    60 San Angelo, TX S 76.4          49.3 -41 19
    61 Fresno, CA M 76.1        319.2 16 77
    62 Corpus Christi, TX M 75.8        196.6 17 79
    63 Bowling Green, KY S 75.5          72.6 -11 52
    64 Laredo, TX S 74.9        100.2 -20 44
    65 San Rafael, CA Metro Div. S 74.9        113.0  
    66 Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL S 74.8          66.8  
    67 Bellingham, WA S 74.1          88.4 35 102
    68 Clarksville, TN-KY S 74.0          88.2 71 139
    69 Kansas City, KS L 74.0        458.8 100 169
    70 Longview, TX S 74.0        105.4 62 132
    71 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI L 73.9        521.2 -57 14
    72 Santa Rosa, CA M 73.7        193.7 49 121
    73 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX M 73.5        247.9 -24 49
    74 Boulder, CO M 73.3        178.3 -68 6
    75 Boise City, ID M 73.0        284.2 -30 45
    76 Wenatchee, WA S 72.6          41.1 35 111
    77 Olympia-Tumwater, WA S 72.4        108.9 18 95
    78 Columbus, OH L 72.3     1,028.2 -4 74
    79 Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN S 72.3        102.3 66 145
    80 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Metro Div. L 72.3     1,524.2 68 148
    81 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ L 71.4     1,900.0 3 84
    82 Modesto, CA M 71.4        163.0 40 122
    83 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA M 71.1        180.0 97 180
    84 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA L 71.1     1,372.3 43 127
    85 Grants Pass, OR S 71.0          24.5  
    86 Asheville, NC M 70.8        181.4 8 94
    87 El Centro, CA S 70.8          54.9 -69 18
    88 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Metro Div. L 70.5     1,081.5 38 126
    89 Charlottesville, VA S 69.8        112.2 73 162
    90 Manchester, NH NECTA S 69.8        108.6 139 229
    91 Farmington, NM S 69.7          53.5 231 322
    92 Lexington-Fayette, KY M 69.6        268.3 119 211
    93 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV L 69.1        896.8 35 128
    94 Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, HI S 69.0          72.4  
    95 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA S 68.9          95.7 25 120
    96 Stockton-Lodi, CA M 68.8        212.1 62 158
    97 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN L 68.7     1,006.9 22 119
    98 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL L 68.5     1,224.2 20 118
    99 Salinas, CA S 68.4        132.8 140 239
    100 Prescott, AZ S 68.1          60.9 83 183
    101 Logan, UT-ID S 67.8          58.3 -36 65
    102 Oklahoma City, OK L 67.8        625.8 -47 55
    103 Medford, OR S 67.5          82.0 112 215
    104 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA S 67.4          48.1 8 112
    105 Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead, MA NECTA Div. S 67.3          45.2  
    106 Baton Rouge, LA M 66.9        399.8 -42 64
    107 Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, MA NECTA Div. S 66.8          80.8 -31 76
    108 Spartanburg, SC S 66.8        140.6 -87 21
    109 Wilmington, NC S 66.4        117.1 -42 67
    110 Jacksonville, FL L 65.9        633.5 -35 75
    111 New Bedford, MA NECTA S 65.8          66.3 -20 91
    112 Tacoma-Lakewood, WA Metro Div. M 65.8        293.5 101 213
    113 Athens-Clarke County, GA S 65.3          93.3 48 161
    114 Chico, CA S 65.1          76.9 -31 83
    115 Iowa City, IA S 65.0          99.0 -76 39
    116 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL M 64.7        166.6 114 230
    117 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metro Div. L 64.4     4,295.6 40 157
    118 Lawrence-Methuen Town-Salem, MA-NH NECTA Div. S 63.8          79.2  
    119 Visalia-Porterville, CA S 63.5        116.6 -22 97
    120 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL S 63.4          48.4 153 273
    121 Tyler, TX S 63.2        100.2 -15 106
    122 Danbury, CT NECTA S 63.2          79.5 86 208
    123 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA M 63.1        345.7 -81 42
    124 Cheyenne, WY S 62.4          47.1 -56 68
    125 Casper, WY S 62.4          43.2 -1 124
    126 Sebring, FL S 62.4          25.8  
    127 Dubuque, IA S 62.3          60.3 24 151
    128 Ocala, FL S 62.2          98.3 167 295
    129 Cleveland, TN S 62.2          46.0 -82 47
    130 Janesville-Beloit, WI S 61.6          66.8 33 163
    131 Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury Town, MA-NH NECTA Div. S 61.3          62.8 -85 46
    132 Burlington-South Burlington, VT NECTA S 61.0        124.2 65 197
    133 Kennewick-Richland, WA S 60.7        104.6 -18 115
    134 Lubbock, TX S 60.6        138.6 -108 26
    135 College Station-Bryan, TX S 60.5        106.1 -119 16
    136 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA S 60.5        130.4 2 138
    137 Elizabethtown-Fort Knox, KY S 60.4          54.5 48 185
    138 Madison, WI M 60.3        386.9 5 143
    139 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX M 60.2        168.8 232 371
    140 Yuba City, CA S 59.8          40.5 55 195
    141 St. Cloud, MN S 59.6        107.0 -41 100
    142 Houma-Thibodaux, LA S 59.4        101.6 -109 33
    143 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC M 59.3        294.2 -51 92
    144 Sioux Falls, SD S 59.2        146.5 -82 62
    145 Corvallis, OR S 59.2          40.3 83 228
    146 Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA L 59.0        902.1 46 192
    147 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX S 58.9        138.1 -93 54
    148 Gettysburg, PA S 58.7          34.9  
    149 Pueblo, CO S 57.9          60.6 -19 130
    150 Columbia, MO S 57.9          98.5 -145 5
    151 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Div. L 57.8     1,742.0 -52 99
    152 Burlington, NC S 57.5          60.9 187 339
    153 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI L 57.4     1,903.7 15 168
    154 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA S 57.3          77.0 -38 116
    155 Killeen-Temple, TX S 57.2        136.2 -84 71
    156 Fond du Lac, WI S 57.1          48.3 18 174
    157 Idaho Falls, ID S 56.8          60.2 -44 113
    158 Madera, CA S 56.7          36.5 -4 154
    159 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metro Div. L 56.4     1,182.7 16 175
    160 Knoxville, TN M 56.2        382.8 60 220
    161 Chambersburg-Waynesboro, PA S 55.9          59.8  
    162 Springfield, MO M 55.9        204.8 -84 78
    163 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL S 55.4        103.4 19 182
    164 Salem, OR M 55.3        151.5 14 178
    165 Redding, CA S 54.9          63.1 11 176
    166 Grand Forks, ND-MN S 54.8          58.0 -26 140
    167 Macon, GA S 54.7        102.7 149 316
    168 Mankato-North Mankato, MN S 54.7          56.4 -70 98
    169 Panama City, FL S 54.4          78.4 20 189
    170 Midland, MI S 54.3          37.7  
    171 Williamsport, PA S 54.0          56.8 17 188
    172 Punta Gorda, FL S 53.8          44.6 -87 85
    173 Worcester, MA-CT NECTA M 53.7        277.1 102 275
    174 Kokomo, IN S 53.6          40.7 -84 90
    175 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC M 53.4        228.2 126 301
    176 Reno, NV M 53.4        204.2 -10 166
    177 Ocean City, NJ S 53.3          36.6 -95 82
    178 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA M 53.3        235.4 58 236
    179 Dover-Durham, NH-ME NECTA S 53.2          52.7  
    180 Tulsa, OK M 53.1        445.6 -16 164
    181 Grand Junction, CO S 53.1          61.9 28 209
    182 Lincoln, NE M 52.8        185.7 -78 104
    183 Monroe, MI S 52.6          41.8 -60 123
    184 Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH NECTA Div. S 52.3        147.6 62 246
    185 Colorado Springs, CO M 52.3        263.9 -1 184
    186 Hattiesburg, MS S 52.0          62.5 40 226
    187 Flagstaff, AZ S 51.9          64.3 -52 135
    188 Reading, PA M 51.7        176.7 99 287
    189 Columbia, SC M 51.2        375.8 -8 181
    190 Peabody-Salem-Beverly, MA NECTA Div. S 51.2          96.2 31 221
    191 Morgantown, WV S 51.0          70.2 -103 88
    192 Rapid City, SD S 50.9          65.0 35 227
    193 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL M 50.8        184.6 24 217
    194 Richmond, VA L 50.7        638.1 -17 177
    195 Jacksonville, NC S 50.5          50.0 -54 141
    196 Barnstable Town, MA NECTA S 50.3          97.6 -79 117
    197 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN L 49.8     1,047.8 22 219
    198 Ithaca, NY S 49.7          70.6 -69 129
    199 Jackson, TN S 49.7          65.6 0 199
    200 Gainesville, FL S 49.4        135.2 50 250
    201 Lewiston, ID-WA S 49.0          27.4 56 257
    202 Appleton, WI S 48.9        122.1 56 258
    203 Green Bay, WI M 48.4        173.6 28 231
    204 Lancaster, PA M 48.4        240.5 77 281
    205 Pocatello, ID S 48.2          35.2 71 276
    206 Dover, DE S 47.5          68.0 -69 137
    207 Sherman-Denison, TX S 47.5          45.6 -74 133
    208 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA L 47.3        486.6 -35 173
    209 Framingham, MA NECTA Div. M 47.3        171.0 -57 152
    210 Battle Creek, MI S 47.2          58.9 -76 134
    211 Hammond, LA S 47.2          44.7  
    212 Hanford-Corcoran, CA S 47.1          37.6 58 270
    213 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD S 47.0          88.2 -57 156
    214 Trenton, NJ M 46.9        252.9 -100 114
    215 Manhattan, KS S 46.7          43.7 68 283
    216 New Orleans-Metairie, LA L 46.7        566.2 -111 105
    217 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Metro Div. L 46.7     3,597.7 8 225
    218 Eau Claire, WI S 46.5          85.3 -48 170
    219 Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metro Div. M 46.5        352.1 -9 210
    220 Billings, MT S 46.1          83.1 -78 142
    221 Tallahassee, FL M 46.1        176.3 77 298
    222 Yakima, WA S 46.0          80.5 -20 202
    223 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA M 46.0        295.6 10 233
    224 Sheboygan, WI S 45.3          60.9 54 278
    225 Lafayette, LA M 45.3        221.8 -198 27
    226 Greenville, NC S 45.1          78.4 -137 89
    227 Urban Honolulu, HI L 44.9        467.2 -102 125
    228 Dalton, GA S 44.8          67.7 163 391
    229 Delaware County, PA M 44.7        232.4  
    230 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL M 44.6        205.5 5 235
    231 Portsmouth, NH-ME NECTA S 44.1          83.6 -162 69
    232 Wausau, WI S 44.0          71.6 104 336
    233 El Paso, TX M 43.8        296.7 -87 146
    234 Abilene, TX S 43.7          69.2 -47 187
    235 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ M 43.7        354.0 20 255
    236 Evansville, IN-KY M 43.4        157.9 60 296
    237 Eugene, OR S 43.1        149.7 -15 222
    238 Jackson, MS M 42.9        273.3 71 309
    239 Kansas City, MO L 42.7        571.7 89 328
    240 Albany, OR S 42.7          41.1  
    241 Springfield, MA-CT NECTA M 42.7        324.0 70 311
    242 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA S 41.9          87.1 72 314
    243 Owensboro, KY S 41.7          52.6 -78 165
    244 Kankakee, IL S 41.6          45.2 -2 242
    245 Huntsville, AL M 41.6        217.9 -42 203
    246 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Div. L 41.5     2,560.7 -87 159
    247 Valdosta, GA S 41.3          55.5 37 284
    248 Philadelphia City, PA L 41.0        684.3 18 266
    249 Muskegon, MI S 40.9          63.0 4 253
    250 Gadsden, AL S 40.8          37.6 4 254
    251 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV S 40.7        103.4 -60 191
    252 Chattanooga, TN-GA M 40.4        242.1 36 288
    253 Sumter, SC S 40.4          38.9 -81 172
    254 New Haven, CT NECTA M 39.9        282.4 -47 207
    255 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Metro Div. L 39.9     1,292.3 -61 194
    256 Harrisonburg, VA S 39.4          65.4 -50 206
    257 Grand Island, NE S 38.9          43.0  
    258 Lawrence, KS S 38.8          52.9 -46 212
    259 Florence, SC S 38.4          85.6 -63 196
    260 Walla Walla, WA S 38.4          27.1  
    261 Lewiston-Auburn, ME NECTA S 38.2          50.6 4 265
    262 Northern Virginia, VA L 38.1     1,388.0 -113 149
    263 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ L 38.1        845.9  
    264 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA M 38.0        409.4 -13 251
    265 Elgin, IL Metro Div. M 37.9        249.9  
    266 Amarillo, TX S 37.9        117.4 -52 214
    267 Rome, GA S 37.6          40.4 62 329
    268 Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metro Div. M 37.6        399.2 -108 160
    269 Flint, MI S 37.4        142.3 79 348
    270 Leominster-Gardner, MA NECTA S 37.3          50.4 50 320
    271 Springfield, OH S 37.2          52.3 -135 136
    272 Rockford, IL M 37.1        150.9 88 360
    273 Anchorage, AK M 37.1        177.7 -87 186
    274 Greensboro-High Point, NC M 37.0        354.7 31 305
    275 Fort Wayne, IN M 36.7        212.9 -77 198
    276 Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, PA M 36.7        262.5 89 365
    277 Ann Arbor, MI M 36.6        211.3 -124 153
    278 Missoula, MT S 36.3          57.6 -168 110
    279 Winston-Salem, NC M 36.0        255.2 -38 241
    280 Hot Springs, AR S 35.8          38.0 14 294
    281 Bloomsburg-Berwick, PA S 35.7          43.2  
    282 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA L 35.7        571.3 -26 256
    283 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY L 35.7        457.2 20 303
    284 Morristown, TN S 35.5          44.2 -13 271
    285 Lebanon, PA S 35.4          51.4 -138 147
    286 Brunswick, GA S 35.1          41.7 91 377
    287 Rochester, MN S 34.2        114.9 -97 190
    288 Waco, TX S 33.9        112.4 -50 238
    289 Canton-Massillon, OH M 33.9        172.2 -55 234
    290 Hinesville, GA S 33.6          19.9 -47 243
    291 St. Joseph, MO-KS S 33.2          62.9 -124 167
    292 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI L 33.1        845.7 -3 289
    293 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI S 32.9          95.1 -88 205
    294 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA S 32.4          92.7 -57 237
    295 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA S 32.3        122.2 35 330
    296 Birmingham-Hoover, AL L 32.2        516.4 -32 264
    297 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA L 32.1        568.7 0 297
    298 Gary, IN Metro Div. M 32.1        276.5 8 306
    299 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL S 31.9          56.4 -59 240
    300 Jackson, MI S 31.9          55.9 41 341
    301 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA M 31.9        330.1 -78 223
    302 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL M 31.7        199.8 67 369
    303 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN S 31.6          77.2 -172 131
    304 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Metro Div. L 31.5     1,024.8  
    305 State College, PA S 31.4          77.3 -89 216
    306 Joplin, MO S 31.2          81.6 -127 179
    307 Columbus, GA-AL S 31.2        123.2 -55 252
    308 New Bern, NC S 31.0          44.1  
    309 Roanoke, VA M 30.9        161.4 -1 308
    310 Duluth, MN-WI S 30.9        134.0 -110 200
    311 Pittsburgh, PA L 30.7     1,164.6 -29 282
    312 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI S 30.4        137.6 38 350
    313 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Metro Div. L 30.2        734.4 54 367
    314 California-Lexington Park, MD S 30.1          44.3  
    315 Alexandria, LA S 30.1          64.3 32 347
    316 Akron, OH M 30.1        332.2 -72 244
    317 Las Cruces, NM S 30.1          71.1 -124 193
    318 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI S 29.9        141.0 58 376
    319 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY L 29.9        688.8  
    320 Saginaw, MI S 29.6          88.7 -53 267
    321 Memphis, TN-MS-AR L 29.5        622.5 19 340
    322 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR M 29.3        347.8 -62 260
    323 Portland-South Portland, ME NECTA M 29.2        193.8 -49 274
    324 Waterbury, CT NECTA S 29.0          68.4 -62 262
    325 Erie, PA S 29.0        130.6 0 325
    326 Taunton-Middleborough-Norton, MA NECTA Div. S 28.5          58.7  
    327 Topeka, KS S 28.3        111.6 -36 291
    328 Lansing-East Lansing, MI M 28.3        225.6 -127 201
    329 Johnson City, TN S 28.2          78.6 34 363
    330 Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD M 28.2        387.7 -67 263
    331 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY L 27.9        556.7 -32 299
    332 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ S 27.8          46.6 17 349
    333 Rochester, NY L 27.4        527.8 -26 307
    334 York-Hanover, PA M 27.2        180.1 -2 332
    335 Baltimore City, MD M 27.2        365.1 -18 317
    336 Bloomington, IN S 27.1          77.0 -77 259
    337 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Metro Div. L 26.9        576.2 -76 261
    338 Salisbury, MD-DE S 25.7        142.3 0 338
    339 Kingston, NY S 25.7          60.9 -20 319
    340 Cedar Rapids, IA S 25.2        140.5 -60 280
    341 Pittsfield, MA NECTA S 25.1          41.4 1 342
    342 Wheeling, WV-OH S 25.0          69.1 -138 204
    343 Warner Robins, GA S 24.9          70.5 -71 272
    344 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI S 24.7          60.2 -40 304
    345 Dayton, OH M 24.6        374.5 33 378
    346 Tucson, AZ M 24.5        370.8 -46 300
    347 Wichita, KS M 24.4        294.5 -45 302
    348 St. Louis, MO-IL L 24.1     1,314.3 -27 321
    349 Cleveland-Elyria, OH L 24.0     1,038.2 -15 334
    350 Montgomery, AL M 23.9        170.3 -58 292
    351 Toledo, OH M 23.8        298.3 -72 279
    352 Albuquerque, NM M 23.3        380.3 14 366
    353 Bangor, ME NECTA S 23.3          66.4 -85 268
    354 Nashua, NH-MA NECTA Div. S 22.8        125.4 -64 290
    355 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC L 22.7        753.9 -43 312
    356 Fort Smith, AR-OK S 22.6        113.4 -2 354
    357 Champaign-Urbana, IL S 22.6        108.7 -13 344
    358 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC S 22.6        147.2 -12 346
    359 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ L 22.5        895.1 -73 286
    360 Mansfield, OH S 22.4          52.9 23 383
    361 Santa Fe, NM S 21.8          61.8 -43 318
    362 Newark, NJ-PA Metro Div. L 21.7     1,188.1 -35 327
    363 Danville, IL S 21.6          29.3 33 396
    364 Glens Falls, NY S 21.5          53.6 -2 362
    365 Cape Girardeau, MO-IL S 21.4          44.7 -72 293
    366 Altoona, PA S 21.1          61.1 -29 337
    367 Parkersburg-Vienna, WV S 21.1          43.2 7 374
    368 Springfield, IL S 20.8        111.4 -37 331
    369 Racine, WI S 20.6          76.0 -13 356
    370 Bay City, MI S 20.6          37.4 -57 313
    371 Great Falls, MT S 20.4          35.5 -221 150
    372 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY S 20.4          41.6  
    373 Peoria, IL M 20.1        178.0 -18 355
    374 Yuma, AZ S 20.0          52.7 -59 315
    375 Lynchburg, VA S 19.8        103.7 -7 368
    376 Fayetteville, NC S 19.8        128.6 -99 277
    377 Cumberland, MD-WV S 19.5          39.9 -67 310
    378 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL M 19.3        183.0 -27 351
    379 Mobile, AL M 19.3        174.8 -15 364
    380 Staunton-Waynesboro, VA S 18.4          48.6  
    381 Monroe, LA S 18.3          78.3 -136 245
    382 Lawton, OK S 18.0          45.4 -134 248
    383 Syracuse, NY M 17.8        318.1 -40 343
    384 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA M 17.8        226.2 -39 345
    385 Fairbanks, AK S 17.7          37.5 -153 232
    386 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH S 17.0        141.5 -29 357
    387 Elmira, NY S 16.4          39.6 -2 385
    388 Muncie, IN S 16.3          51.0 -65 323
    389 Beckley, WV S 16.1          47.3  
    390 Dothan, AL S 16.1          57.3 -17 373
    391 Dutchess County-Putnam County, NY Metro Div. S 15.6        142.4  
    392 Carson City, NV S 15.6          27.9 1 393
    393 Camden, NJ Metro Div. L 15.5        515.3 -14 379
    394 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS M 15.5        152.0 -147 247
    395 Lima, OH S 15.3          52.6 -71 324
    396 Albany, GA S 15.2          61.6 -37 359
    397 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA M 15.1        183.5 -44 353
    398 Homosassa Springs, FL S 14.9          32.5  
    399 Goldsboro, NC S 14.4          42.6 -114 285
    400 Texarkana, TX-AR S 13.9          59.1 -28 372
    401 Wichita Falls, TX S 13.7          58.5 -15 386
    402 Decatur, AL S 13.0          53.8 -50 352
    403 Jefferson City, MO S 12.0          76.1 -42 361
    404 Utica-Rome, NY S 11.9        127.8 -34 370
    405 Terre Haute, IN S 11.7          70.8 -47 358
    406 Bloomington, IL S 11.2          94.4 -22 384
    407 Charleston, WV S 10.5        123.3 -20 387
    408 Johnstown, PA S 10.0          57.8 -27 381
    409 Carbondale-Marion, IL S 9.8          54.4  
    410 Decatur, IL S 9.7          50.8 -20 390
    411 Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ S 9.4          34.7  
    412 Michigan City-La Porte, IN S 9.4          41.9 -15 397
    413 East Stroudsburg, PA S 9.4          55.4  
    414 Norwich-New London-Westerly, CT-RI NECTA S 9.2        127.5 -25 389
    415 Binghamton, NY S 8.8        105.7 -21 394
    416 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL S 8.6          46.3 -28 388
    417 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH S 6.9          42.9 -37 380
    418 Rocky Mount, NC S 6.3          57.7 -26 392
    419 Pine Bluff, AR S 3.7          33.9 -21 398
    420 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ S 3.6        130.6 -25 395
    421 Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ S 3.6          56.6 -39 382
  • Large Cities Rankings – 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

    We used five measures of growth to rank MSAs over the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the new Office of Management and Budget definitions of MSAs for all series released after March 2015. As a result, the MSA listed in this year’s rankings do not necessary correspond directly to those listed in prior years. In some instances, MSAs were consolidated with others — for example Pascagoula, MS, was combined with the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS, MSA to form the new Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, MSA. Others were separated from previously consolidated MSAs and in still other instances individual counties were shifted from one MSA to another. The bottom line is that this year’s rankings are based on good time series for the newly defined MSAs but may not be precisely comparable to those listed in prior years. The total number of MSAs included in this year’s rankings has risen from 398 to 421. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment.

    2015  Rank Among Small Cities Area 2015 Weighted INDEX  2014 Nonfarm Emplymt (1000s)  Rank Change 2014 Size Ranking
    1 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Metro Div. 97.5    1,034.2 1 2
    2 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 97.2    1,031.5 -1 1
    3 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metro Div. 91.4    2,346.3 6 9
    4 Austin-Round Rock, TX 90.9       924.9 -1 3
    5 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 90.8       892.0 1 6
    6 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 90.2    2,973.6 -1 5
    7 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 89.6    1,364.0 3 10
    8 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 88.8    1,135.7 0 8
    9 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 86.2    1,085.8 5 14
    10 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 84.9       960.3 2 12
    11 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 83.9    1,319.1 6 17
    12 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 83.2    2,551.7 12 24
    13 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Div. 82.8       993.0 -2 11
    14 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metro Div. 82.6    1,575.6 1 15
    15 Raleigh, NC 82.5       571.5 -11 4
    16 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metro Div. 81.5    1,114.8 2 18
    17 New York City, NY 80.9    4,165.9 -10 7
    18 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Metro Div. 80.8       576.2 7 25
    19 Salt Lake City, UT 78.7       666.2 -6 13
    20 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Metro Div. 78.2       796.1 7 27
    21 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 77.4       642.4 15 36
    22 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 77.0    1,090.5 -3 19
    23 Kansas City, KS 74.0       458.8 16 39
    24 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 73.9       521.2 -21 3
    25 Columbus, OH 72.3    1,028.2 -5 20
    26 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Metro Div. 72.3    1,524.2 8 34
    27 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 71.4    1,900.0 -5 22
    28 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 71.1    1,372.3 4 32
    29 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Metro Div. 70.5    1,081.5 2 31
    30 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV 69.1       896.8 3 33
    31 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 68.7    1,006.9 -2 29
    32 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 68.5    1,224.2 -4 28
    33 Oklahoma City, OK 67.8       625.8 -17 16
    34 Jacksonville, FL 65.9       633.5 -13 21
    35 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metro Div. 64.4    4,295.6 2 37
    36 Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA 59.0       902.1 7 43
    37 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Div. 57.8    1,742.0 -14 23
    38 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 57.4    1,903.7 1 39
    39 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metro Div. 56.4    1,182.7 2 41
    40 Richmond, VA 50.7       638.1 2 42
    41 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 49.8    1,047.8 5 46
    42 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 47.3       486.6 -2 40
    43 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 46.7       566.2 -17 26
    44 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Metro Div. 46.7    3,597.7 3 47
    45 Urban Honolulu, HI 44.9       467.2 -15 30
    46 Kansas City, MO 42.7       571.7 15 61
    47 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Div. 41.5    2,560.7 -9 38
    48 Philadelphia City, PA 41.0       684.3 3 51
    49 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Metro Div. 39.9    1,292.3 -5 44
    50 Northern Virginia, VA 38.1    1,388.0 -15 35
    51 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ 38.1       845.9  
    52 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 35.7       571.3 -4 48
    53 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 35.7       457.2 4 57
    54 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 33.1       845.7 0 54
    55 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 32.2       516.4 -5 50
    56 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 32.1       568.7 -1 55
    57 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Metro Div. 31.5    1,024.8  
    58 Pittsburgh, PA 30.7    1,164.6 -6 52
    59 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Metro Div. 30.2       734.4 6 65
    60 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY 29.9       688.8  
    61 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 29.5       622.5 3 64
    62 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 27.9       556.7 -6 56
    63 Rochester, NY 27.4       527.8 -6 57
    64 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Metro Div. 26.9       576.2 -15 49
    65 St. Louis, MO-IL 24.1    1,314.3 -6 59
    66 Cleveland-Elyria, OH 24.0    1,038.2 -4 62
    67 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 22.7       753.9 -9 58
    68 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 22.5       895.1 -15 53
    69 Newark, NJ-PA Metro Div. 21.7    1,188.1 -9 60
    70 Camden, NJ Metro Div. 15.5       515.3 -4 66