Tag: Best Cities 2017

  • The Cities Creating The Most High-Wage Jobs

    As the country moves toward full employment, at least as economists define it, the quality of jobs has replaced joblessness as the primary concern. With wages still stagnant, rising an anemic 2.5% in the year to May, the biggest challenge for most parts of the U.S. is not getting more people into the workforce but rather driving the creation of the types of jobs that can sustain a middle-class quality of life.

    To that end, the key sector to watch is business and professional services. By far the nation’s largest high-wage sector — including such fields as law, accounting, architecture, advertising, engineering, scientific research and development, and computer systems design – it employs 20.5 million Americans, roughly the same as the finance and manufacturing industries combined. Over the past decade, the number of people working in business and professional services has expanded by nearly 2.5 million, including an increase of more than half a million jobs in the last year.

    We decided to take a look at which metropolitan areas are gaining the most professional and business services jobs and the trends that are driving some to pull ahead while others fade. Our rankings look at employment in the sector over time— assessing short, medium and long-term job trends and adding in variables for persistence and momentum as well. The results of these trends, based on three-month averages, are normalized and each metropolitan statistical area is assigned a score based on its relative position in each area. The rankings this year produced some surprising results, as well as some familiar stories.

    The shift to affordable places

    Looking at the 70 largest labor markets in the country, the clear winners are affordable, business-friendly locales – and their momentum is growing. These span an array of regions, from the Midwest heartland to the Deep South, Texas and the Intermountain West.

    Our number one metro area for professional and business service jobs, Nashville, Tenn., epitomizes many of the characteristics that drive high-end employment today. Since 2011, Nashville’s job count in professional and business services has expanded a remarkable 42.6% to 160,300, easily the highest growth rate of any major metropolitan area. Management and technical consulting, architecture and related services have led this growth.

    The very forces that lead companies to Nashville — low taxes and a pro-business regulatory environment — also apply to several of our other top 10 places. These include No. 2 Kansas City, Mo., which has logged 28.4% growth since 2011. KC, better known in the rest of the country for barbecue and its music scene (though not quite Nashville), has grown a vibrant economy based in good part on service businesses in architecture and innovative administrative support models (especially for health care providers), accounting for some 100,000 jobs in professional and business services.

    But for the most part of the fastest-growing areas for business services are also the same areas that did best on our overall list. These include the Texas powerhouses of Austin-Round Rock (third), Dallas-Plano-Irving (fifth), and San Antonio-Braunfels (sixth), all of which logged 25% job growth or more since 2011. Salt Lake City, ranked ninth, has become a major magnet for business service, outpacing such hot spots as 21st-ranked Seattle and No. 28 Denver. Charlotte, another consistent performer, ranked eighth.

    The last big region for fast-growing high-wage service jobs is Florida, led by 10th-ranked Orlando, 11th-place Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater and No. 14 Ft. Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach. Better known for its huge hospitality industry, Florida cities like Orlando have become major lures to large companies seeking lower costs and taxes. Orlando is home to corporate or regional headquarters of Darden Restaurants, Tupperware, AAA, Deloitte, and the fast-growing auto service firm, Greenway Automotive. Over the last two years, the business services sector grew more than tourism, adding almost 24,000 jobs compared to 21,300 for tourism.

    Places Where Value Still Outpaces Costs

    Yet not all of the economies creating the most high-wage jobs are in the lower-cost states. There remains a handful of places with high taxes and strict regulation that are attractive to businesspeople. Perhaps the best example is San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, which is down two notches from last year to fourth place, but remains on a tear, with over 34% growth since 2011. This growth is driven in large part by the tech industry, which is increasingly integrated into business services.

    One prime example is Salesforce.com, a firm with strong tech assets, but whose customer relationship management tools are firmly in the business service space. The company has quadrupled its sales to $8 billion since 2012 and now employs 6,600 people at its San Francisco headquarters, making it the second largest private employer in the city after the venerable Wells Fargo.

    Seventh-ranked San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, the capital of Silicon Valley, has also been able to dodge the cost bullet, enjoying 34% business services job growth since 2011. Other high cost areas that have seen impressive growth in business services include No. 20 New York, with 21.2% growth since 2011 to 735,300 jobS

    the most of any metro area in the nation, as well as No. 24 Boston, with 17.1% growth over the same period. As competitive pressure in these tech-heavy metro areas has surged, it has driven up the local demand for professional services.

    Many other high-cost metro areas have not done so well. In Southern California, 32nd-ranked Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, with a job growth rate of 19.3%, is the pick of the litter. Other parts of this heavily populated area do worse, including San Diego 49th ) and Los Angeles (53rd), where growth was 11.6%, way below the average of 16.5% for large MSAs. Riverside-San Bernardino, which did respectably in our overall job growth survey, ranked a poor 67th in business services, with a 6.9% drop last year.

    What the future may bring

    The future of business services presents a mixed picture. Areas with particularly strong technical expertise, such as the Bay Area and Boston, and financial talent, notably New York, continue to do well. Yet job growth is slowing in all three; San Jose and San Francisco posted the lowest growth among the top 10 metro areas in 2016, well below such places as Nashville, San Antonio and Kansas City.

    Does this suggest a developing trend? Certainly the ease of online communication may grease the skids for firms to locate people in less expensive regions. Although salaries for business professionals are higher in places like San Francisco or New York, the cost of living, particularly housing, cuts into the value of their salaries. Estimated median home prices in the City by the Bay hit $1.5 million in May, more than six times the national median price of $244,800.

    Further down the road, we may also see the shift of some business to small and mid-sized cities, which constituted 10 of the top 12 fastest growing areas for business service jobs, led by such diverse places as Wausau, Wisc., Monroe, Mich., and College Station, Texas. As companies look to cut costs and still offer a middle-class standard of living to their employees, such shifts could be in hand. If so, the much dismissed prospects for small cities may prove far brighter than many may expect.

    This piece originally appeared on Forbes.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com. He is the Roger Hobbs Distinguished Fellow in Urban Studies at Chapman University and executive director of the Houston-based Center for Opportunity Urbanism. His newest book is The Human City: Urbanism for the rest of us. He is also author of The New Class ConflictThe City: A Global History, and The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050. He lives in Orange County, CA.

    Dr. Michael Shires primary areas of teaching and research include state, regional and local policy; technology and democracy; higher education policy; strategic, political and organizational issues in public policy; and quantitative analysis. He often serves as a consultant to local and state government on issues related to finance, education policy and governance. Dr. Shires has been quoted as an expert in various publications including USA TodayNewsweekThe EconomistThe Sacramento Bee, San Francisco Chronicle, and LA Times. He has also appeared as a guest commentator on CNN, KTLA and KCAL to name a few.

    Photo by Peter Miller, via Flickr, using CC License.

  • All Cities Business Services Jobs – 2017 Best Cities Rankings

    Read about how we selected the 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2017 MSA Prof & Bus Svcs  – Overall Ranking Area Weighted INDEX 2016 Nonfarm Emplymt (1000s) Total Prof &
    Bus Svcs Emplymt Growth Rate 2015-2016
    Overall Rank Change
    2016 to 2017
    1 Wausau, WI 92.5 73.0 13.8% 110
    2 Monroe, MI 91.1 42.1 4.6% 1
    3 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 89.7 968.8 5.2% (1)
    4 College Station-Bryan, TX 89.6 116.5 8.9% 9
    5 Provo-Orem, UT 89.0 243.4 5.8% 13
    6 Jackson, TN 88.9 68.8 10.0% 4
    7 Salisbury, MD-DE 88.1 149.7 14.0% 30
    8 Grants Pass, OR 87.8 25.8 14.8% 124
    9 Bend-Redmond, OR 86.7 78.5 5.6% 23
    10 Topeka, KS 85.8 113.4 7.5% 119
    11 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 85.5 249.5 8.0% 5
    12 Kansas City, MO 85.3 608.6 9.0% 35
    13 Cleveland, TN 84.2 51.7 12.5% 228
    14 Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead, MA NECTA Div 84.1 45.2 5.3% 295
    15 Olympia-Tumwater, WA 83.8 114.7 3.6% 66
    16 Gainesville, FL 83.5 143.3 7.1% 56
    17 Elizabethtown-Fort Knox, KY 82.8 57.2 5.4% (10)
    18 Laredo, TX 82.0 104.2 11.3% 5
    19 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 81.9 96.8 4.1% 213
    20 Austin-Round Rock, TX 81.7 1,015.4 3.7% (12)
    21 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 81.5 199.3 10.3% 3
    22 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 81.3 237.3 7.2% 180
    23 St. George, UT 80.2 61.8 2.1% (11)
    24 Boise City, ID 79.9 311.0 10.4% 248
    25 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Metro Div 79.5 1,108.6 2.8% (20)
    26 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metro Div 79.3 2,554.6 5.5% (5)
    27 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 79.2 1,027.9 5.5% 70
    28 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 79.0 1,084.7 2.6% (14)
    29 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL 78.9 301.9 5.4% 46
    30 Morristown, TN 78.6 46.2 15.1% 204
    31 Springfield, IL 78.2 115.7 14.4% 90
    32 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC 78.2 154.1 10.4% 125
    33 State College, PA 77.7 78.0 7.8% 106
    34 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 76.3 1,170.0 4.8% (5)
    35 Salt Lake City, UT 76.2 713.6 4.4% 49
    36 Lubbock, TX 76.0 146.9 7.3% 49
    37 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 75.9 132.7 7.0% 62
    38 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 75.7 109.8 4.0% 66
    39 Spartanburg, SC 75.7 149.4 8.9% 145
    40 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 75.6 1,233.2 4.8% (14)
    41 Yuba City, CA 75.3 43.4 13.6% 49
    42 Redding, CA 75.2 66.1 7.4% 6
    43 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 75.2 1,321.1 5.2% (9)
    44 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 75.1 2,721.2 4.6% (1)
    45 Sioux Falls, SD 74.9 153.4 6.3% (34)
    46 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 74.8 670.8 5.2% (10)
    47 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Metro Div 74.3 836.9 4.1% 16
    48 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV 73.8 964.6 4.6% 7
    49 Ann Arbor, MI 73.8 220.3 7.9% 34
    50 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 73.3 350.5 5.9% 66
    51 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 73.2 148.2 10.9% 93
    52 Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA 71.9 958.1 6.7% 141
    53 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 71.8 262.6 2.0% (34)
    54 Port St. Lucie, FL 71.7 146.4 6.7% 10
    55 Fort Smith, AR-OK 71.7 113.9 2.4% 181
    56 Waco, TX 71.6 119.8 0.0% (29)
    57 Raleigh, NC 71.5 610.1 4.7% (35)
    58 Savannah, GA 70.5 177.9 12.4% 56
    59 Tacoma-Lakewood, WA Metro Div 70.4 309.8 -0.3% 36
    60 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 70.2 307.1 5.1% 107
    61 Philadelphia City, PA 69.9 714.0 4.9% 139
    62 Kankakee, IL 69.8 44.9 18.5% 124
    63 Monroe, LA 69.6 79.5 5.2% 193
    64 Eugene, OR 69.6 158.4 5.6% 78
    65 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 69.6 1,153.4 1.8% (35)
    66 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL 69.4 145.2 1.3% 47
    67 New York City, NY 68.9 4,388.9 3.1% (23)
    68 Santa Rosa, CA 68.7 202.0 7.6% 42
    69 Tallahassee, FL 68.3 181.7 9.0% 194
    70 Charlottesville, VA 67.8 115.5 1.8% (45)
    71 Boulder, CO 67.8 188.2 5.7% 132
    72 Reno, NV 67.6 225.1 4.2% 21
    73 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 67.5 249.8 0.8% (17)
    74 Madison, WI 67.4 399.4 4.2% 29
    75 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metro Div 67.2 1,664.4 2.6% (17)
    76 Ocala, FL 67.0 103.5 10.7% 190
    77 Dover, DE 66.6 69.3 4.5% (1)
    78 Wilmington, NC 66.6 123.5 5.5% 45
    79 Athens-Clarke County, GA 66.6 94.4 3.0% 17
    80 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metro Div 66.5 1,180.1 2.6% 26
    81 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 66.1 360.1 2.8% (43)
    82 Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH NECTA Div 66.1 155.0 3.9% 228
    83 Flagstaff, AZ 65.8 66.2 8.9% (34)
    84 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 65.6 143.0 4.2% 25
    85 Taunton-Middleborough-Norton, MA NECTA Div 65.4 59.5 4.4% 33
    86 Gary, IN Metro Div 65.1 280.2 6.3% 204
    87 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 64.8 151.9 9.4% 229
    88 Asheville, NC 64.7 188.7 1.8% (31)
    89 Jackson, MI 64.4 57.4 3.6% 214
    90 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY 64.3 42.0 0.0% 240
    91 Lincoln, NE 64.3 189.9 8.0% 73
    92 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Metro Div 64.2 623.6 3.3% (18)
    93 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Div 64.2 1,831.6 2.7% 27
    94 Bowling Green, KY 64.1 76.3 6.1% (29)
    95 Greeley, CO 64.0 100.3 2.1% (62)
    96 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 63.8 2,015.6 3.3% 5
    97 Modesto, CA 63.6 173.5 3.7% 54
    98 Yuma, AZ 63.6 55.9 7.0% 35
    99 Salem, OR 63.0 162.1 2.8% (5)
    100 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ 62.8 895.9 1.9% 0
    101 Lawton, OK 62.7 45.9 3.0% (95)
    102 Janesville-Beloit, WI 62.5 67.6 2.2% (93)
    103 El Paso, TX 62.5 315.1 3.8% 89
    104 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 62.4 1,056.9 0.8% (34)
    105 Panama City, FL 62.0 82.6 -0.9% (3)
    106 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 62.0 219.6 6.7% 30
    107 Lexington-Fayette, KY 61.9 281.2 -2.1% 0
    108 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 61.7 128.3 6.8% 74
    109 Napa, CA 61.3 70.9 3.0% (92)
    110 Montgomery, AL 61.0 173.4 6.5% 203
    111 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, CA 61.0 114.5 -3.2% (45)
    112 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 61.0 1,442.3 1.7% (61)
    113 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Metro Div 60.7 1,150.1 2.4% (5)
    114 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 60.6 571.5 2.1% (32)
    115 York-Hanover, PA 59.7 184.5 3.3% 40
    116 Tuscaloosa, AL 59.5 105.9 1.3% (74)
    117 Johnson City, TN 59.4 80.0 6.9% 153
    118 Jackson, MS 59.3 280.2 -0.4% 59
    119 Fort Collins, CO 59.2 162.6 3.0% 92
    120 Toledo, OH 59.2 313.5 3.9% 101
    121 Wichita, KS 58.8 296.9 4.0% 20
    122 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA 58.8 242.3 3.2% (51)
    123 Salinas, CA 58.7 137.9 -0.5% (32)
    124 Prescott, AZ 58.5 62.6 3.9% (55)
    125 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY 58.3 712.1 4.2% 87
    126 Springfield, MO 58.2 212.6 2.4% (49)
    127 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 57.9 142.9 2.4% 27
    128 Lake Charles, LA 57.8 111.3 -1.1% (124)
    129 Huntsville, AL 57.7 228.8 1.4% 16
    130 Yakima, WA 57.7 84.5 13.4% 10
    131 Trenton, NJ 57.6 269.6 -0.7% (116)
    132 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Metro Div 57.0 1,592.2 2.2% 37
    133 Ithaca, NY 56.7 64.9 1.0% 4
    134 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 56.7 582.6 1.0% (19)
    135 Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury Town, MA-NH NECTA Div 56.4 66.2 3.7% (57)
    136 Killeen-Temple, TX 56.0 146.5 3.0% 22
    137 Logan, UT-ID 55.9 60.9 1.7% (3)
    138 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metro Div 55.3 1,236.6 1.9% (12)
    139 New Bedford, MA NECTA 55.2 68.2 -7.6% (138)
    140 Reading, PA 55.0 178.5 -0.1% (72)
    141 Leominster-Gardner, MA NECTA 54.9 51.8 0.0% 31
    142 Chattanooga, TN-GA 54.9 255.5 2.5% (83)
    143 Bloomsburg-Berwick, PA 54.8 42.4 3.2% 58
    144 Appleton, WI 54.5 125.9 3.0% 106
    145 Clarksville, TN-KY 54.4 89.8 3.5% 25
    146 Columbus, OH 54.4 1,077.8 1.6% (24)
    147 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 54.3 52.1 4.5% 93
    148 Amarillo, TX 53.4 121.4 2.8% 12
    149 Baton Rouge, LA 53.3 405.2 1.2% (70)
    150 Idaho Falls, ID 53.3 63.9 5.1% 58
    151 Nashua, NH-MA NECTA Div 53.0 129.3 -0.2% (3)
    152 Morgantown, WV 52.9 70.9 -0.5% (117)
    153 Framingham, MA NECTA Div 52.5 173.9 -0.1% (67)
    154 Akron, OH 52.5 340.8 2.7% 75
    155 Muskegon, MI 52.5 62.7 5.8% 4
    156 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 52.5 500.1 1.3% (28)
    157 Fresno, CA 52.3 339.1 1.1% 59
    158 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Metro Div 52.3 1,337.8 3.2% 73
    159 St. Louis, MO-IL 52.3 1,368.7 1.4% 46
    160 Bangor, ME NECTA 51.8 66.4 1.0% 2
    161 Kingston, NY 51.8 62.0 3.0% 20
    162 Camden, NJ Metro Div 51.4 540.4 -0.1% (37)
    163 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Metro Div 51.2 3,717.2 0.5% 24
    164 Springfield, OH 51.2 49.6 -2.1% (144)
    165 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 51.1 551.2 1.8% 104
    166 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 50.5 256.4 3.8% 41
    167 Richmond, VA 50.4 666.4 -4.5% (139)
    168 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Div 50.1 2,653.9 2.4% 10
    169 Bellingham, WA 49.9 92.0 -0.8% (23)
    170 Burlington-South Burlington, VT NECTA 49.9 124.9 -0.5% (97)
    171 Northern Virginia, VA 49.5 1,449.9 2.6% 24
    172 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 49.3 1,964.8 1.9% 26
    173 Auburn-Opelika, AL 49.3 63.8 0.5% (128)
    174 Springfield, MA-CT NECTA 49.2 334.8 2.7% (31)
    175 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 48.6 3,017.5 0.0% (48)
    176 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Metro Div 48.6 1,058.2 1.7% 0
    177 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 48.0 48.5 14.6% 78
    178 Jacksonville, FL 48.0 677.5 1.2% (80)
    179 Iowa City, IA 47.9 101.9 4.5% (11)
    180 Fort Wayne, IN 47.8 221.0 3.8% 43
    181 Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, MA NECTA Div 47.8 81.6 0.9% 39
    182 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 47.5 1,439.0 0.2% 8
    183 Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD 47.5 404.3 2.9% 2
    184 Pittsburgh, PA 47.4 1,165.0 1.0% (9)
    185 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 47.3 466.5 2.8% 121
    186 Manchester, NH NECTA 47.2 110.9 -0.8% (132)
    187 Baltimore City, MD 47.1 367.5 -0.6% 72
    188 Peoria, IL 46.8 173.0 0.0% 22
    189 Peabody-Salem-Beverly, MA NECTA Div 46.8 97.1 2.0% 86
    190 Knoxville, TN 46.8 395.7 -0.7% (128)
    191 New Haven, CT NECTA 46.6 281.7 0.6% (25)
    192 Barnstable Town, MA NECTA 46.6 100.6 1.6% 26
    193 Fargo, ND-MN 46.4 142.2 0.2% (152)
    194 Billings, MT 46.4 84.9 4.6% 169
    195 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 46.1 91.1 0.0% (57)
    196 Delaware County, PA 45.9 235.9 1.0% (66)
    197 Colorado Springs, CO 45.9 281.6 -0.5% (3)
    198 Mansfield, OH 45.6 52.6 3.1% 149
    199 Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, PA 45.6 261.1 -6.8% (75)
    200 Stockton-Lodi, CA 45.6 227.9 -2.2% (169)
    201 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 45.5 928.9 2.3% 53
    202 Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN 45.3 104.8 4.0% 20
    203 Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, HI 45.3 75.2 2.4% (50)
    204 Coeur d’Alene, ID 45.1 60.6 1.1% 146
    205 Cedar Rapids, IA 45.1 143.9 3.4% 90
    206 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 45.1 354.8 -0.2% 32
    207 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metro Div 45.0 4,442.2 1.1% 36
    208 East Stroudsburg, PA 44.8 57.7 0.0% 22
    209 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 44.8 646.2 -3.2% (148)
    210 Winston-Salem, NC 44.6 262.3 -2.0% (121)
    211 Urban Honolulu, HI 44.5 481.1 0.7% (23)
    212 Battle Creek, MI 44.4 59.4 0.5% 52
    213 Portland-South Portland, ME NECTA 44.1 200.9 0.7% (22)
    214 Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ 43.9 60.1 -3.7% 124
    215 Canton-Massillon, OH 43.9 171.7 2.8% 104
    216 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 43.8 339.0 -3.7% (111)
    217 Kansas City, KS 43.8 469.2 -0.6% (82)
    218 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 43.7 1,087.6 1.6% 33
    219 Corvallis, OR 43.6 42.2 -2.3% (159)
    220 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Div 43.6 1,023.6 0.7% (1)
    221 Dayton, OH 43.4 385.4 0.9% (7)
    222 Rockford, IL 43.4 150.0 3.1% (91)
    223 Macon, GA 43.2 103.5 0.3% (143)
    224 Victoria, TX 42.9 42.2 5.3% (51)
    225 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 42.5 235.5 0.5% 20
    226 Portsmouth, NH-ME NECTA 42.5 90.6 -2.8% (114)
    227 Mobile, AL 42.3 179.0 0.1% 40
    228 Punta Gorda, FL 42.2 48.9 -2.9% (111)
    229 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Metro Div 42.2 753.3 2.2% (16)
    230 Fond du Lac, WI 41.8 48.4 -1.2% (163)
    231 Lancaster, PA 41.7 250.3 -2.2% 17
    232 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Metro Div 41.6 598.0 2.0% 68
    233 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 41.4 41.3 5.0% 20
    234 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 41.1 213.4 4.6% 83
    235 Bismarck, ND 41.1 73.5 -5.2% (196)
    236 Burlington, NC 40.4 61.7 -0.6% (148)
    237 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 40.4 412.4 -3.2% (197)
    238 Danbury, CT NECTA 40.3 79.5 -1.1% (42)
    239 Medford, OR 40.1 86.2 1.4% 43
    240 Columbus, IN 40.0 52.9 -0.6% (148)
    241 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 40.0 577.0 0.6% (35)
    242 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 40.0 305.9 1.0% 98
    243 Dalton, GA 39.8 69.8 3.3% 38
    244 Grand Forks, ND-MN 39.7 59.0 2.2% 24
    245 Syracuse, NY 39.6 317.6 3.1% 119
    246 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 39.5 138.8 1.3% 25
    247 Tyler, TX 39.3 106.0 0.4% 52
    248 San Rafael, CA Metro Div 39.3 115.9 1.5% (31)
    249 Rapid City, SD 39.0 65.8 1.3% 12
    250 Roanoke, VA 38.9 163.5 0.2% (100)
    251 Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metro Div 38.8 404.0 -4.9% 9
    252 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 38.4 522.9 0.4% (8)
    253 Pittsfield, MA NECTA 38.2 41.4 0.0% 32
    254 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 38.2 565.7 2.3% 91
    255 Cleveland-Elyria, OH 37.7 1,051.8 0.9% 22
    256 Owensboro, KY 37.7 53.5 -0.8% (104)
    257 Lewiston, ID-WA 37.5 28.7 2.5% 91
    258 Evansville, IN-KY 37.5 159.0 1.4% 34
    259 Greensboro-High Point, NC 37.4 361.6 -0.3% (213)
    260 Bakersfield, CA 37.4 258.1 2.1% 45
    261 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 37.4 122.4 1.7% (24)
    262 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 37.3 857.0 -1.6% (37)
    263 Lawrence, KS 37.1 54.7 -2.9% 65
    264 Rochester, NY 37.0 532.9 -1.4% 20
    265 Abilene, TX 37.0 68.3 -0.6% (32)
    266 Kennewick-Richland, WA 36.7 110.6 1.8% (38)
    267 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 36.6 174.3 -0.6% (118)
    268 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 36.5 1,436.3 -6.9% (59)
    269 Pueblo, CO 36.4 62.2 -1.0% (216)
    270 Texarkana, TX-AR 36.0 60.6 -0.8% (151)
    271 Bay City, MI 35.8 36.4 3.2% (106)
    272 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 35.6 182.9 -1.6% (25)
    273 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 35.6 87.8 3.9% 82
    274 Terre Haute, IN 35.4 71.6 4.6% 22
    275 Chico, CA 35.1 81.7 -0.6% (104)
    276 Saginaw, MI 34.8 89.1 -0.3% (189)
    277 Albuquerque, NM 34.7 390.1 0.6% 41
    278 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 34.6 768.4 -0.6% 1
    279 Decatur, IL 34.6 51.4 -2.9% 15
    280 St. Cloud, MN 34.3 108.4 0.0% (53)
    281 Utica-Rome, NY 33.9 126.5 2.0% 72
    282 Walla Walla, WA 33.9 28.2 0.0% (85)
    283 Eau Claire, WI 33.8 85.2 0.4% (41)
    284 Altoona, PA 33.4 60.7 0.0% (10)
    285 Lewiston-Auburn, ME NECTA 33.3 51.7 -0.5% (111)
    286 Lima, OH 33.0 52.9 -4.8% (125)
    287 Corpus Christi, TX 32.8 191.0 -3.7% (107)
    288 Newark, NJ-PA Metro Div 32.7 1,193.8 -0.8% (64)
    289 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA 32.4 182.9 -0.2% 4
    290 Columbus, GA-AL 32.3 121.5 -0.8% (12)
    291 Glens Falls, NY 32.3 54.9 0.6% (56)
    292 Oklahoma City, OK 31.6 628.3 -1.7% (53)
    293 Worcester, MA-CT NECTA 31.5 284.1 0.1% 50
    294 Las Cruces, NM 31.5 73.2 -0.5% 28
    295 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 31.3 108.9 -4.2% (96)
    296 Bloomington, IN 31.3 77.5 4.5% 64
    297 Duluth, MN-WI 31.2 135.3 -0.8% 11
    298 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 31.2 61.1 -1.8% (52)
    299 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 31.2 38.5 0.0% 2
    300 Tulsa, OK 31.1 444.4 -0.6% 23
    301 Gadsden, AL 31.0 38.6 -8.1% (251)
    302 Dothan, AL 31.0 57.8 1.5% 44
    303 Champaign-Urbana, IL 30.3 109.8 1.7% 36
    304 Santa Fe, NM 30.2 63.5 -0.7% (47)
    305 Columbia, SC 30.1 395.4 -8.3% (126)
    306 Waterbury, CT NECTA 29.7 67.0 -1.8% 21
    307 Erie, PA 29.3 127.8 1.0% (9)
    308 Pocatello, ID 28.5 35.8 -5.3% (152)
    309 Racine, WI 28.1 76.9 2.2% 6
    310 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 27.4 101.4 -2.4% (127)
    311 Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metro Div 27.0 359.8 -3.6% (62)
    312 Chambersburg-Waynesboro, PA 26.8 60.1 -13.0% (260)
    313 Sherman-Denison, TX 26.8 46.7 -6.7% 18
    314 El Centro, CA 26.7 53.0 -6.9% 11
    315 Carson City, NV 26.3 28.6 3.7% 41
    316 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 26.3 89.1 -3.7% (12)
    317 Cheyenne, WY 26.3 46.0 -1.0% 27
    318 Tucson, AZ 26.0 377.8 -2.3% (114)
    319 Norwich-New London-Westerly, CT-RI NECTA 26.0 129.0 -1.1% (5)
    320 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 25.9 361.6 -7.1% (18)
    321 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 25.6 163.7 -1.8% (106)
    322 Rochester, MN 25.3 118.5 -2.4% 14
    323 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL 25.3 45.8 2.3% 43
    324 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 25.1 223.7 -1.7% 10
    325 Dutchess County-Putnam County, NY Metro Div 25.0 143.5 -0.3% 27
    326 Rocky Mount, NC 24.9 58.0 0.0% (14)
    327 Missoula, MT 24.9 59.8 -2.1% 10
    328 Flint, MI 24.8 140.7 -0.9% (17)
    329 Dover-Durham, NH-ME NECTA 24.5 54.6 -10.7% (182)
    330 Greenville, NC 24.4 79.3 0.5% (44)
    331 Great Falls, MT 24.3 35.9 -2.2% (58)
    332 Danville, IL 23.9 28.6 1.7% (56)
    333 Sheboygan, WI 23.6 61.8 -0.8% (7)
    334 Fayetteville, NC 23.5 130.6 -5.7% (46)
    335 Grand Junction, CO 23.3 60.9 -3.2% (48)
    336 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 23.2 180.1 -0.4% 15
    337 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN 22.8 79.0 -0.5% 21
    338 Decatur, AL 22.6 53.6 -2.5% 3
    339 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 22.3 137.2 -3.9% (113)
    340 Visalia-Porterville, CA 22.3 125.6 -8.3% (82)
    341 Midland, TX 21.2 87.5 -8.9% (178)
    342 Bloomington, IL 21.2 93.0 -2.4% 17
    343 Elgin, IL Metro Div 21.2 253.1 -5.5% (52)
    344 Longview, TX 21.0 96.8 -4.2% (79)
    345 Lawrence-Methuen Town-Salem, MA-NH NECTA Div 20.7 82.6 -0.7% (24)
    346 San Angelo, TX 20.0 48.8 -2.7% (22)
    347 Binghamton, NY 19.9 104.3 -2.6% 2
    348 Lynchburg, VA 18.7 104.5 -3.9% 6
    349 Fairbanks, AK 18.4 36.1 -4.6% (69)
    350 Albany, OR 17.7 44.0 -11.1% (98)
    351 Charleston, WV 17.4 118.9 -5.6% (44)
    352 Lafayette, LA 17.3 198.5 -8.0% (69)
    353 Anchorage, AK 17.1 173.7 -7.6% (33)
    354 Madera, CA 17.0 37.3 -1.5% (165)
    355 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS 16.8 154.0 -4.9% 7
    356 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA 16.7 407.9 -7.3% (24)
    357 Wichita Falls, TX 16.5 57.5 -5.2% 0
    358 Green Bay, WI 16.2 173.9 -6.5% (25)
    359 Odessa, TX 15.2 69.7 -8.3% (24)
    360 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 14.0 57.2 -4.2% (31)
    361 Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ 12.8 34.5 -4.2% 0
    362 Johnstown, PA 12.8 55.6 -9.5% (65)
    363 Merced, CA 12.0 65.7 -7.9% 2
    364 Elmira, NY 11.1 37.7 -7.1% (102)
    365 Casper, WY 10.8 37.1 -8.3% (23)
    366 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 9.9 41.0 -17.5% (77)
  • Large Cities Business Services Jobs – 2017 Best Cities Rankings

    Read about how we selected the 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2017 MSA Prof & Bus Svcs Ranking among Large MSAs Area Weighted INDEX 2016 Prof & Bus Svcs  Emplmt (1000s) Total Prof &
    Bus Svcs Emplmt Growth Rate 2015-2016
    Overall Rank Change
    2016 to 2017
    1 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 89.7 160.3 5.2% 0
    2 Kansas City, MO 85.3 99.6 9.0% 13
    3 Austin-Round Rock, TX 81.7 171.1 3.7% 0
    4 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Metro Div 79.5 274.4 2.8% (2)
    5 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metro Div 79.3 482.8 5.5% 0
    6 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 79.2 134.0 5.5% 19
    7 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 79.0 227.5 2.6% (3)
    8 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 76.3 198.9 4.8% 1
    9 Salt Lake City, UT 76.2 126.1 4.4% 15
    10 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 75.6 209.6 4.8% (3)
    11 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 75.2 236.6 5.2% 0
    12 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 75.1 503.7 4.6% 1
    13 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 74.8 91.8 5.2% (1)
    14 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Metro Div 74.3 151.2 4.1% 6
    15 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV 73.8 136.8 4.6% 2
    16 Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA 71.9 131.3 6.7% 30
    17 Raleigh, NC 71.5 115.2 4.7% (11)
    18 Philadelphia City, PA 69.9 97.6 4.9% 31
    19 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 69.6 176.6 1.8% (9)
    20 New York City, NY 68.9 735.3 3.1% (6)
    21 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metro Div 67.2 250.9 2.6% (3)
    22 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metro Div 66.5 170.8 2.6% 7
    23 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Metro Div 64.2 111.1 3.3% (1)
    24 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Div 64.2 354.4 2.7% 8
    25 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 63.8 348.7 3.3% 3
    26 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ 62.8 155.7 1.9% 1
    27 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 62.4 169.9 0.8% (6)
    28 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 61.0 257.1 1.7% (12)
    29 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Metro Div 60.7 182.4 2.4% 1
    30 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 60.6 73.7 2.1% (7)
    31 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY 58.3 92.2 4.2% 22
    32 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Metro Div 57.0 299.2 2.2% 7
    33 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 56.7 71.0 1.0% (2)
    34 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metro Div 55.3 269.7 1.9% 1
    35 Columbus, OH 54.4 182.3 1.6% (2)
    36 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 52.5 74.5 1.3% 1
    37 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Metro Div 52.3 176.5 3.2% 21
    38 St. Louis, MO-IL 52.3 211.1 1.4% 12
    39 Camden, NJ Metro Div 51.4 78.6 -0.1% (5)
    40 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Metro Div 51.2 689.7 0.5% 3
    41 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 51.1 79.1 1.8% 23
    42 Richmond, VA 50.4 110.7 -4.5% (34)
    43 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Div 50.1 615.4 2.4% (1)
    44 Northern Virginia, VA 49.5 398.9 2.6% 3
    45 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 49.3 321.9 1.9% 3
    46 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 48.6 470.6 0.0% (10)
    47 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Metro Div 48.6 202.4 1.7% (6)
    48 Jacksonville, FL 48.0 102.3 1.2% (22)
    49 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 47.5 234.8 0.2% (4)
    50 Pittsburgh, PA 47.4 183.2 1.0% (10)
    51 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 47.3 55.4 2.8% 18
    52 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 45.5 145.8 2.3% 11
    53 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metro Div 45.0 610.7 1.1% 7
    54 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 44.8 98.3 -3.2% (35)
    55 Urban Honolulu, HI 44.5 67.9 0.7% (11)
    56 Kansas City, KS 43.8 92.9 -0.6% (18)
    57 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 43.7 170.4 1.6% 5
    58 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Div 43.6 112.4 0.7% (3)
    59 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Metro Div 42.2 125.5 2.2% (5)
    60 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Metro Div 41.6 128.1 2.0% 8
    61 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 40.0 74.8 0.6% (10)
    62 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 38.4 65.9 0.4% (1)
    63 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 38.2 72.4 2.3% 7
    64 Cleveland-Elyria, OH 37.7 148.7 0.9% 1
    65 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 37.3 124.1 -1.6% (8)
    66 Rochester, NY 37.0 68.2 -1.4% 1
    67 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 36.5 146.8 -6.9% (15)
    68 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 34.6 103.7 -0.6% (2)
    69 Newark, NJ-PA Metro Div 32.7 216.2 -0.8% (13)
    70 Oklahoma City, OK 31.6 78.7 -1.7% (11)
  • Mid Sized Cities Business Services Jobs – 2017 Best Cities Rankings

    Read about how we selected the 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2017 MSA Prof & Bus Svcs Ranking among Midsized MSAs Area Weighted INDEX 2016 Prof & Bus Svcs  Emplmt (1000s) Total Prof & Bus Svc Emplmt Growth Rate 2011-2016 Overall Rank Change
    2016 to 2017
    1 Provo-Orem, UT 89.0 32.9 40.1% 3
    2 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 85.5 51.1 33.7% 1
    3 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 81.5 23.9 34.3% 3
    4 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 81.3 38.4 25.1% 52
    5 Boise City, ID 79.9 46.7 21.7% 72
    6 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL 78.9 45.8 48.1% 12
    7 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC 78.2 14.5 33.4% 38
    8 Sioux Falls, SD 74.9 15.2 22.9% (7)
    9 Ann Arbor, MI 73.8 30.8 24.7% 12
    10 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 73.3 54.1 20.8% 22
    11 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 71.8 34.9 34.4% (6)
    12 Savannah, GA 70.5 20.9 16.1% 19
    13 Tacoma-Lakewood, WA Metro Div 70.4 29.2 25.7% 13
    14 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 70.2 42.5 17.4% 34
    15 Eugene, OR 69.6 18.1 24.0% 23
    16 Santa Rosa, CA 68.7 21.8 24.9% 14
    17 Tallahassee, FL 68.3 21.0 17.1% 58
    18 Boulder, CO 67.8 36.1 17.7% 39
    19 Reno, NV 67.6 31.6 23.8% 5
    20 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 67.5 29.1 26.3% (8)
    21 Madison, WI 67.4 52.4 18.8% 6
    22 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 66.1 48.1 20.9% (13)
    23 Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH NECTA Div 66.1 23.9 14.7% 62
    24 Gary, IN Metro Div 65.1 24.3 17.6% 55
    25 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 64.8 14.7 12.2% 61
    26 Asheville, NC 64.7 18.5 16.6% (13)
    27 Lincoln, NE 64.3 19.8 14.6% 19
    28 Modesto, CA 63.6 15.1 20.2% 15
    29 Salem, OR 63.0 13.6 25.8% (4)
    30 El Paso, TX 62.5 34.9 16.0% 24
    31 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 62.0 29.9 20.6% 5
    32 Lexington-Fayette, KY 61.9 42.6 28.2% (3)
    33 Montgomery, AL 61.0 22.5 10.9% 52
    34 York-Hanover, PA 59.7 21.9 15.1% 10
    35 Jackson, MS 59.3 34.8 18.4% 14
    36 Fort Collins, CO 59.2 20.3 16.9% 25
    37 Toledo, OH 59.2 38.9 17.5% 28
    38 Wichita, KS 58.8 34.3 16.5% (1)
    39 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA 58.8 26.2 15.4% (22)
    40 Springfield, MO 58.2 25.1 21.4% (21)
    41 Huntsville, AL 57.7 55.0 14.4% (1)
    42 Trenton, NJ 57.6 43.6 18.7% (40)
    43 Reading, PA 55.0 23.8 17.5% (27)
    44 Chattanooga, TN-GA 54.9 29.3 13.1% (30)
    45 Baton Rouge, LA 53.3 48.8 14.1% (25)
    46 Framingham, MA NECTA Div 52.5 36.4 13.8% (24)
    47 Akron, OH 52.5 54.0 10.7% 20
    48 Fresno, CA 52.3 31.9 21.0% 16
    49 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 50.5 16.4 8.6% 10
    50 Springfield, MA-CT NECTA 49.2 26.7 9.9% (11)
    51 Fort Wayne, IN 47.8 21.7 6.9% 15
    52 Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD 47.5 49.2 7.1% 0
    53 Baltimore City, MD 47.1 47.7 15.5% 20
    54 Peoria, IL 46.8 23.9 2.9% 6
    55 Knoxville, TN 46.8 61.9 10.9% (40)
    56 New Haven, CT NECTA 46.6 30.3 10.2% (9)
    57 Delaware County, PA 45.9 32.1 8.0% (23)
    58 Colorado Springs, CO 45.9 43.3 10.8% (3)
    59 Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, PA 45.6 30.6 13.2% (26)
    60 Stockton-Lodi, CA 45.6 19.2 22.1% (53)
    61 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 45.1 47.0 10.2% 7
    62 Winston-Salem, NC 44.6 35.1 9.4% (39)
    63 Portland-South Portland, ME NECTA 44.1 27.4 5.9% (10)
    64 Canton-Massillon, OH 43.9 14.6 7.9% 24
    65 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 43.8 47.1 12.2% (37)
    66 Dayton, OH 43.4 51.4 8.7% (4)
    67 Rockford, IL 43.4 16.5 6.2% (32)
    68 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 42.5 22.3 7.7% 1
    69 Mobile, AL 42.3 22.8 5.1% 7
    70 Lancaster, PA 41.7 23.9 13.8% 1
    71 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 41.1 30.6 3.1% 15
    72 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 40.4 68.1 10.2% (62)
    73 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 40.0 36.6 6.6% 21
    74 Syracuse, NY 39.6 34.0 2.7% 24
    75 Roanoke, VA 38.9 21.8 6.7% (33)
    76 Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metro Div 38.8 69.2 8.1% (2)
    77 Evansville, IN-KY 37.5 18.8 -0.2% 4
    78 Greensboro-High Point, NC 37.4 50.2 6.6% (67)
    79 Bakersfield, CA 37.4 26.4 2.7% 5
    80 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 36.6 22.1 2.9% (39)
    81 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 35.6 24.5 8.7% (11)
    82 Albuquerque, NM 34.7 58.1 3.0% 5
    83 Corpus Christi, TX 32.8 16.6 8.8% (32)
    84 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA 32.4 22.1 0.9% (2)
    85 Worcester, MA-CT NECTA 31.5 26.7 -0.6% 10
    86 Tulsa, OK 31.1 57.8 6.0% 4
    87 Columbia, SC 30.1 47.2 8.8% (37)
    88 Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metro Div 27.0 54.0 5.5% (16)
    89 Tucson, AZ 26.0 49.9 2.2% (31)
    90 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 25.9 47.6 2.5% (7)
    91 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 25.6 14.5 -1.4% (28)
    92 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 25.1 21.7 -3.1% 1
    93 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 23.2 16.7 -6.7% 3
    94 Elgin, IL Metro Div 21.2 33.5 2.4% (14)
    95 Lafayette, LA 17.3 19.9 -6.9% (17)
    96 Anchorage, AK 17.1 18.8 -9.5% (7)
    97 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS 16.8 14.8 -10.5% 0
    98 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA 16.7 63.5 -4.7% (7)
    99 Green Bay, WI 16.2 18.6 -7.0% (7)
  • Small Cities Business Services Jobs – 2017 Best Cities Rankings

    Read about how we selected the 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2017 MSA Prof & Bus Svcs  – Small MSAs Area Weighted INDEX 2016 Prof & Bus Svcs  Emplmt (1000s) Total Prof &
    Bus Svcs Emplmt Growth Rate 2015-2016
    Overall Rank Change
    2016 to 2017
    1 Wausau, WI 92.5       7.2 13.8% 50
    2 Monroe, MI 91.1       5.3 4.6% 0
    3 College Station-Bryan, TX 89.6       9.0 8.9% 6
    4 Jackson, TN 88.9       7.3 10.0% 3
    5 Salisbury, MD-DE 88.1     13.3 14.0% 13
    6 Grants Pass, OR 87.8       2.3 14.8% 54
    7 Bend-Redmond, OR 86.7       9.4 5.6% 8
    8 Topeka, KS 85.8     14.9 7.5% 51
    9 Clevel&, TN 84.2     10.5 12.5% 105
    10 Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead, MA NECTA Div 84.1       3.3 5.3% 146
    11 Olympia-Tumwater, WA 83.8     11.5 3.6% 28
    12 Gainesville, FL 83.5     14.2 7.1% 22
    13 Elizabethtown-Fort Knox, KY 82.8       7.1 5.4% (8)
    14 Laredo, TX 82.0       9.8 11.3% (2)
    15 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 81.9     12.7 4.1% 92
    16 St. George, UT 80.2       4.9 2.1% (8)
    17 Morristown, TN 78.6       4.1 15.1% 92
    18 Springfield, IL 78.2     14.9 14.4% 39
    19 State College, PA 77.7       6.9 7.8% 46
    20 Lubbock, TX 76.0     12.8 7.3% 20
    21 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 75.9     10.7 7.0% 26
    22 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 75.7     15.6 4.0% 27
    23 Spartanburg, SC 75.7     17.9 8.9% 68
    24 Yuba City, CA 75.3       3.3 13.6% 19
    25 Redding, CA 75.2       6.7 7.4% (3)
    26 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 73.2     18.3 10.9% 41
    27 Port St. Lucie, FL 71.7     17.5 6.7% 2
    28 Fort Smith, AR-OK 71.7     12.9 2.4% 83
    29 Waco, TX 71.6     12.5 0.0% (15)
    30 Kankakee, IL 69.8       3.6 18.5% 62
    31 Monroe, LA 69.6       8.8 5.2% 90
    32 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL 69.4     16.1 1.3% 21
    33 Charlottesville, VA 67.8     15.3 1.8% (20)
    34 Ocala, FL 67.0     10.0 10.7% 94
    35 Dover, DE 66.6       4.6 4.5% 1
    36 Wilmington, NC 66.6     16.0 5.5% 22
    37 Athens-Clarke County, GA 66.6       8.0 3.0% 9
    38 Flagstaff, AZ 65.8       3.3 8.9% (15)
    39 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 65.6     12.3 4.2% 11
    40 Taunton-Middleborough-Norton, MA NECTA Div 65.4       6.3 4.4% 15
    41 Jackson, MI 64.4       4.8 3.6% 111
    42 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY 64.3       2.4 0.0% 129
    43 Bowling Green, KY 64.1       9.3 6.1% (13)
    44 Greeley, CO 64.0       9.8 2.1% (28)
    45 Yuma, AZ 63.6       7.1 7.0% 16
    46 Lawton, OK 62.7       4.6 3.0% (42)
    47 Janesville-Beloit, WI 62.5       6.1 2.2% (41)
    48 Panama City, FL 62.0     10.9 -0.9% 0
    49 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 61.7     10.4 6.8% 40
    50 Napa, CA 61.3       6.9 3.0% (40)
    51 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, CA 61.0       9.9 -3.2% (20)
    52 Tuscaloosa, AL 59.5     10.7 1.3% (32)
    53 Johnson City, TN 59.4       8.8 6.9% 77
    54 Salinas, CA 58.7     13.2 -0.5% (10)
    55 Prescott, AZ 58.5       3.5 3.9% (22)
    56 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 57.9     14.0 2.4% 17
    57 Lake Charles, LA 57.8       9.4 -1.1% (54)
    58 Yakima, WA 57.7       4.2 13.4% 8
    59 Ithaca, NY 56.7       3.5 1.0% 4
    60 Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury Town, MA-NH NECTA Div 56.4       5.6 3.7% (23)
    61 Killeen-Temple, TX 56.0     10.2 3.0% 14
    62 Logan, UT-ID 55.9       6.1 1.7% 0
    63 New Bedford, MA NECTA 55.2       5.7 -7.6% (62)
    64 Leominster-Gardner, MA NECTA 54.9       3.9 0.0% 21
    65 Bloomsburg-Berwick, PA 54.8       4.3 3.2% 32
    66 Appleton, WI 54.5     13.9 3.0% 51
    67 Clarksville, TN-KY 54.4       8.9 3.5% 16
    68 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 54.3       5.4 4.5% 45
    69 Amarillo, TX 53.4       9.8 2.8% 8
    70 Idaho Falls, ID 53.3     13.7 5.1% 28
    71 Nashua, NH-MA NECTA Div 53.0     15.4 -0.2% (1)
    72 Morgantown, WV 52.9       6.6 -0.5% (55)
    73 Muskegon, MI 52.5       3.7 5.8% 3
    74 Bangor, ME NECTA 51.8       6.7 1.0% 5
    75 Kingston, NY 51.8       4.6 3.0% 13
    76 Springfield, OH 51.2       4.7 -2.1% (65)
    77 Bellingham, WA 49.9       8.0 -0.8% (9)
    78 Burlington-South Burlington, VT NECTA 49.9     14.2 -0.5% (43)
    79 Auburn-Opelika, AL 49.3       7.4 0.5% (58)
    80 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 48.0       3.4 14.6% 40
    81 Iowa City, IA 47.9       7.0 4.5% 1
    82 Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, MA NECTA Div 47.8       7.1 0.9% 19
    83 Manchester, NH NECTA 47.2     16.0 -0.8% (56)
    84 Peabody-Salem-Beverly, MA NECTA Div 46.8     10.3 2.0% 50
    85 Barnstable Town, MA NECTA 46.6       8.7 1.6% 15
    86 Fargo, ND-MN 46.4     15.8 0.2% (67)
    87 Billings, MT 46.4       9.1 4.6% 109
    88 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 46.1       7.7 0.0% (24)
    89 Mansfield, OH 45.6       5.6 3.1% 93
    90 Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN 45.3       7.7 4.0% 12
    91 Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, HI 45.3       7.2 2.4% (19)
    92 Coeur d’Alene, ID 45.1       6.3 1.1% 93
    93 Cedar Rapids, IA 45.1     14.3 3.4% 53
    94 East Stroudsburg, PA 44.8       3.5 0.0% 12
    95 Battle Creek, MI 44.4       6.2 0.5% 31
    96 Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ 43.9       4.3 -3.7% 80
    97 Corvallis, OR 43.6       4.3 -2.3% (69)
    98 Macon, GA 43.2     11.6 0.3% (60)
    99 Victoria, TX 42.9       2.6 5.3% (13)
    100 Portsmouth, NH-ME NECTA 42.5     11.5 -2.8% (48)
    101 Punta Gorda, FL 42.2       4.5 -2.9% (47)
    102 Fond du Lac, WI 41.8       2.7 -1.2% (70)
    103 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 41.4       2.8 5.0% 16
    104 Bismarck, ND 41.1       7.9 -5.2% (86)
    105 Burlington, NC 40.4       5.5 -0.6% (63)
    106 Danbury, CT NECTA 40.3       9.3 -1.1% (12)
    107 Medford, OR 40.1       7.1 1.4% 32
    108 Columbus, IN 40.0       5.4 -0.6% (63)
    109 Dalton, GA 39.8       6.2 3.3% 29
    110 Grand Forks, ND-MN 39.7       3.1 2.2% 19
    111 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 39.5     12.6 1.3% 20
    112 Tyler, TX 39.3       8.9 0.4% 38
    113 San Rafael, CA Metro Div 39.3     18.6 1.5% (14)
    114 Rapid City, SD 39.0       5.1 1.3% 10
    115 Pittsfield, MA NECTA 38.2       4.0 0.0% 25
    116 Owensboro, KY 37.7       3.9 -0.8% (45)
    117 Lewiston, ID-WA 37.5       1.4 2.5% 66
    118 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 37.4       9.7 1.7% (6)
    119 Lawrence, KS 37.1       5.6 -2.9% 50
    120 Abilene, TX 37.0       5.5 -0.6% (12)
    121 Kennewick-Richland, WA 36.7     21.2 1.8% (16)
    122 Pueblo, CO 36.4       6.8 -1.0% (96)
    123 Texarkana, TX-AR 36.0       4.3 -0.8% (67)
    124 Bay City, MI 35.8       3.3 3.2% (43)
    125 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 35.6       8.1 3.9% 64
    126 Terre Haute, IN 35.4       5.3 4.6% 21
    127 Chico, CA 35.1       5.4 -0.6% (43)
    128 Saginaw, MI 34.8     11.2 -0.3% (87)
    129 Decatur, IL 34.6       3.3 -2.9% 16
    130 St. Cloud, MN 34.3       8.5 0.0% (26)
    131 Utica-Rome, NY 33.9       8.5 2.0% 56
    132 Walla Walla, WA 33.9       0.9 0.0% (37)
    133 Eau Claire, WI 33.8       9.0 0.4% (18)
    134 Altoona, PA 33.4       5.4 0.0% (1)
    135 Lewiston-Auburn, ME NECTA 33.3       6.8 -0.5% (48)
    136 Lima, OH 33.0       4.7 -4.8% (58)
    137 Columbus, GA-AL 32.3     12.9 -0.8% (1)
    138 Glens Falls, NY 32.3       5.6 0.6% (28)
    139 Las Cruces, NM 31.5       6.8 -0.5% 25
    140 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 31.3       9.2 -4.2% (44)
    141 Bloomington, IN 31.3       4.7 4.5% 53
    142 Duluth, MN-WI 31.2       8.1 -0.8% 13
    143 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 31.2       5.6 -1.8% (27)
    144 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 31.2       1.3 0.0% 7
    145 Gadsden, AL 31.0       3.8 -8.1% (121)
    146 Dothan, AL 31.0       4.4 1.5% 35
    147 Champaign-Urbana, IL 30.3       7.8 1.7% 30
    148 Santa Fe, NM 30.2       4.5 -0.7% (26)
    149 Waterbury, CT NECTA 29.7       5.4 -1.8% 19
    150 Erie, PA 29.3     10.0 1.0% (1)
    151 Pocatello, ID 28.5       3.6 -5.3% (77)
    152 Racine, WI 28.1       6.3 2.2% 9
    153 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 27.4       9.4 -2.4% (63)
    154 Chambersburg-Waynesboro, PA 26.8       5.4 -13.0% (129)
    155 Sherman-Denison, TX 26.8       2.8 -6.7% 17
    156 El Centro, CA 26.7       2.2 -6.9% 10
    157 Carson City, NV 26.3       1.9 3.7% 33
    158 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 26.3       6.9 -3.7% (5)
    159 Cheyenne, WY 26.3       3.2 -1.0% 21
    160 Norwich-New London-Westerly, CT-RI NECTA 26.0       8.7 -1.1% 0
    161 Rochester, MN 25.3       5.5 -2.4% 13
    162 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL 25.3       4.5 2.3% 36
    163 Dutchess County-Putnam County, NY Metro Div 25.0     11.5 -0.3% 23
    164 Rocky Mount, NC 24.9       5.2 0.0% (5)
    165 Missoula, MT 24.9       6.2 -2.1% 10
    166 Flint, MI 24.8     15.3 -0.9% (8)
    167 Dover-Durham, NH-ME NECTA 24.5       3.6 -10.7% (98)
    168 Greenville, NC 24.4       6.6 0.5% (27)
    169 Great Falls, MT 24.3       3.0 -2.2% (37)
    170 Danville, IL 23.9       2.0 1.7% (35)
    171 Sheboygan, WI 23.6       4.0 -0.8% (4)
    172 Fayetteville, NC 23.5     12.2 -5.7% (29)
    173 Grand Junction, CO 23.3       5.1 -3.2% (31)
    174 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN 22.8       6.1 -0.5% 18
    175 Decatur, AL 22.6       5.2 -2.5% 3
    176 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 22.3       9.9 -3.9% (73)
    177 Visalia-Porterville, CA 22.3     10.4 -8.3% (54)
    178 Midland, TX 21.2       8.2 -8.9% (98)
    179 Bloomington, IL 21.2       9.6 -2.4% 14
    180 Longview, TX 21.0       8.4 -4.2% (53)
    181 Lawrence-Methuen Town-Salem, MA-NH NECTA Div 20.7       9.7 -0.7% (18)
    182 San Angelo, TX 20.0       3.6 -2.7% (17)
    183 Binghamton, NY 19.9       8.9 -2.6% 1
    184 Lynchburg, VA 18.7     11.4 -3.9% 4
    185 Fairbanks, AK 18.4       2.1 -4.6% (48)
    186 Albany, OR 17.7       2.9 -11.1% (68)
    187 Charleston, WV 17.4     13.5 -5.6% (33)
    188 Madera, CA 17.0       2.2 -1.5% (95)
    189 Wichita Falls, TX 16.5       3.6 -5.2% 2
    190 Odessa, TX 15.2       3.7 -8.3% (17)
    191 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 14.0       3.8 -4.2% (21)
    192 Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ 12.8       3.8 -4.2% 3
    193 Johnstown, PA 12.8       5.1 -9.5% (45)
    194 Merced, CA 12.0       3.5 -7.9% 3
    195 Elmira, NY 11.1       2.2 -7.1% (70)
    196 Casper, WY 10.8       2.6 -8.3% (17)
    197 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 9.9       1.6 -17.5% (53)
  • The Best Small and Medium-Size Cities For Jobs 2017

    Much of the U.S. media tends to see smaller cities as backwaters, inevitably left behind as the “best and brightest” head to the country’s mega-regions. The new economy, insists the Washington Post, favors large cities for start-ups and new businesses. Richard Florida has posited the emergence of a “winner take all urbanism” that tends to favor the richest cities, such as New York and San Francisco.

    However this paradigm may reflect cosmopolitan attitudes and rivalries between large cities more than reality, with its complications and nuances. Smaller cities have long been disadvantaged in their ability to attract the most elite companies and Americans on the move, but that may well be changing. Following a post-financial crisis period in which many domestic migrants headed to the big cities, the latest Census data suggests that the flow is now going the other way, with the native born moving to smaller places with between 500,000 and a million people. The new trend in migration, notes the Atlantic’s Derek Thompson, a confirmed big city booster, has been a “great hollowing out,” with Americans leaving places like New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco for the suburbs and less costly, usually smaller cities. (Note that at least in New York’s case, foreign immigrants have been taking their places.)

    To be sure, many smaller towns are suffering, and the bottom of our annual survey of employment trends in America’s 421 metro areas is dominated by them, starting with last place Beckley, W.V.; followed by Johnstown, Pa.; Charleston, W.V.; Weirton-Steubenville, Ohio; and Peoria, Illinois. Yet at the same time small city America — which we define as metro areas with less than 150,000 jobs — accounted for seven of the 10 cities where job growth has been the strongest.

    2017 Best Cities Rankings Lists

    Methodology

    Our rankings are based on short-, medium- and long-term job creation, going back to 2005, and factor in momentum — whether growth is slowing or accelerating. We have compiled separate rankings for America’s 70 largest metropolitan statistical areas (those with nonfarm employment over 450,000), as well as medium-size metro areas (between 150,000 and 450,000 nonfarm jobs) and small ones (less than 150,000 nonfarm jobs), the latter two of which are our focus this week, in order to make the comparisons more relevant to each category. (For a detailed description of our methodology, click here).

    The Utah Model

    What makes for successful smaller cities? There’s no simple formula, but several characteristics loom prominently. One is the extent and quality of its amenities: Many of our top cities are in attractive locations near mountains or the ocean, and tend to be home to colleges and universities. And, almost without exception, they are located in less costly, lower-tax states. Finally, it doesn’t hurt to be relatively close to a bigger urban area and a large airport.

    All these characteristics apply to the best metro area for jobs in 2017 — Provo-Orem, Utah. Located an hour south of Salt Lake City and its big airport, the Provo-Orem area has a population of 603,000 and sits alongside the scenic Wasatch Mountains. It’s home to the well-regarded Brigham Young University. Last year the metro area’s job count expanded an impressive 4.4%, and employment is up 29.2% since 2011. As one might suspect in a college-oriented area, the biggest growth has been in fields that tend to hire educated people, such as business and professional services, in which employment grew 5.8% last year, financial services (up 6.7%) and the information sector (plus 5.8%).

    But Provo is not alone in outstanding job growth in the Beehive State. In addition to its largest metro area, Salt Lake City, which ranks 13th, the small city of Saint George ranks third. Also benefiting from a scenic location in the state’s rugged southwestern corner, it’s less of a college town than a retirement and tourism magnet, which explains much of its 5.7% job growth last year. This was driven in large part by big expansions in health and education, with employment in those sectors up 4.6% last year and some 31.8% since 2011.

    Another Utah superstar is 18th-ranked Ogden-Clearfield. Its 2.9% job growth last year was driven in large part by financial services, with employment up 5.7%, and education and health, up 5.9%.

    So what accounts for one relatively small state that’s home to only 3.1% of the U.S. population placing four cities in the top 20? Among the factors: the nation’s fastest population growth, a highly favorable business climate (Gov. Gary Herbert has made cutting red tape a priority of his administration), a burgeoning tech sector and a Mormon-influenced social culture that seems to encourage citizen engagement in local affairs.

    Other Hot Spots

    The other smaller boom towns are a varied lot, although all share locations in low tax, light regulation states. Some bigger cities — San Francisco, Seattle, San Jose — seem to have found a way to keep growing in higher cost environments, but this does not seem to be the case for smaller cities. Virtually all the small communities in our top 20 — with the exception of No. 8 Fort Collins, Colo., — come from such reddish states as the Carolinas, Texas, Idaho and, of course, Utah.

    Most of the fastest-growing metro areas tend to be in what some have called “amenity regions.” This is certainly the case for Ft. Collins, No. 9 Gainesville, Ga., No. 10 The Villages, Fla., and No. 17 Boise, Idaho. Many of these places, notably the Villages, are attractive to retirees and downshifting boomers while others may also lure young families.

    Yet there are some wide differences among our top small cities. Smaller cities often have very distinctive economies dominated by one or two industries. Sixth-ranked Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, a metropolitan area that sprawls between Missouri and Arkansas, is dominated by two forces, Bentonville-based Walmart, and a burgeoning retirement/tourism sector tied to its location in the scenic Ozarks. The area which enjoyed 3.3% job growth last year, and 20.4% since 2011, was paced by an expanding professional and business services sector, up a sizzling 8.0% last year; other dynamic sectors include financial services, up 4.5% last year, as well as the education and health, which grew 4.0%.

    Charleston-North Charleston, which ranked 4th on our list with a 3.2% job growth rate last year and 17.6% since 2011, epitomizes the new dynamic small cities. Not only does the area boast a charming ante-bellum urban core, and some of the country’s best food, it has also become attractive to companies seeking to lower costs. The city is home to Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner assembly plant and to Mercedes-Benz’s $500 million Charleston plant, which will add 1,300 jobs over the next few years. It is also about to house Volvo’s first North American manufacturing plant – a $500 million investment that could add up to 4,000 jobs home. Charleston has also emerged as something of a millennial draw as well, with the largest percentage of residents aged 25 to 34 of any midsized city.

    2017 Best Cities Rankings Lists

    The Future of Smaller Cities

    In contrast to the conventional wisdom, smaller cities may have a brighter future than many expect. Of course, it’s hard to see a rapid turnaround in some deindustrialized cities, particularly in the Midwest. Many energy-dependent cities are down sharply in our ranking from a year ago, including Baton Rouge, La., which dropped 97 places to 191st, and Bismarck, N.D., which plummeted 119 places to 221st. The Trump administration certainly has made noise about helping the energy industry, but the cold reality of the current global oversupply of oil suggests these places won’t be rebounding much in the near term.

    Right now, prospects seem best for amenity rich areas, in part because they appeal to both aging boomer and younger families. The scenic Pacific Northwest is home to many gainers this year, including Olympia-Tumwater, Wash., which gained as impressive 64 places from last year to 21st, Wenatchee, which rose seven spots to 22nd, and Bellingham, which jumped 100 places to 63rd.

    In the South, the attractive coastal city Wilmington, N.C., rose 76 places to 54th, and the Florida beach towns Northport-Sarasota-Bradenton, climbed 28 spots to 35th while Punta Gorda gained 26 places to 39th.

    The future of smaller American cities, in some senses, parallels that of their larger counterparts. Some areas seem positioned for further growth, while many others are stagnating or even dropping. The small city is far from obsolete, with a good number of them poised to expand strongly in the years ahead.

    This piece originally appeared on Forbes.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com. He is the Roger Hobbs Distinguished Fellow in Urban Studies at Chapman University and executive director of the Houston-based Center for Opportunity Urbanism. His newest book is The Human City: Urbanism for the rest of us. He is also author of The New Class ConflictThe City: A Global History, and The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050. He lives in Orange County, CA.

    Dr. Michael Shires primary areas of teaching and research include state, regional and local policy; technology and democracy; higher education policy; strategic, political and organizational issues in public policy; and quantitative analysis. He often serves as a consultant to local and state government on issues related to finance, education policy and governance. Dr. Shires has been quoted as an expert in various publications including USA TodayNewsweekThe EconomistThe Sacramento Bee, San Francisco Chronicle, and LA Times. He has also appeared as a guest commentator on CNN, KTLA and KCAL to name a few.

    Photo by City of St. George (City of St. George) [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons

  • Move Over, San Francisco: Dallas Tops Our List Of The Best Cities For Jobs 2017

    Dallas is called the Big D for a reason. Bigger, better, best: that’s the Dallas mindset. From the gigantic Cowboys stadium in Arlington to the burgeoning northern suburbs to the posh arts district downtown, Dallasites are reinventing their metropolis almost daily. The proposed urban park along the Trinity River, my Dallas friends remind me, will be 11 times bigger than New York’s Central Park.

    Here’s something else for them to boast about: the Dallas-Plano-Irving metropolitan area ranks first this year on our list of the Best Cities For Jobs.

    2017 Best Cities Rankings Lists

    It’s a region that in many ways is the polar opposite of the San Francisco and San Jose metropolitan areas, which have dominated our ranking for the last few years. (They still place second and eighth this year, respectively, among the largest 70 metropolitan areas, though San Jose is down sharply from second place last year.)

    Unlike the tech-driven Bay Area, Dallas’ economy has multiple points of strength, including aerospace and defense, insurance, financial services, life sciences, data processing and transportation. Employment in the metro area has expanded 20.3% over the past five years and 4.2% last year, with robust job creation in professional and business services, as well as in a host of lower-paid sectors like retail, wholesale trade and hospitality.

    According to Southern Methodist University’s Klaus Desmet and Collin Clark, Dallas’s success stems in part from the fact that it isn’t looking to appeal to the elite “creative class,” but to middle-class workers and the companies and executives who employ them. Dallas attracts both foreign and domestic migrants, particularly from places like California, where housing is, on an income-adjusted basis, often three times as expensive. This has had much to do with the relocation to the area of such companies as Jacobs Engineering, Toyota, Liberty Mutual and State Farm.

    Methodology

    Our rankings are based on short-, medium- and long-term job creation, going back to 2005, and factor in momentum — whether growth is slowing or accelerating. We have compiled separate rankings for America’s 70 largest metropolitan statistical areas (those with nonfarm employment over 450,000), which are our focus this week, as well as medium-size metro areas (between 150,000 and 450,000 nonfarm jobs) and small ones (less than 150,000 nonfarm jobs) in order to make the comparisons more relevant to each category. (For a detailed description of our methodology, click here.)

    The Rise of Low-Cost Meccas

    Dallas is far bigger (particularly if you add the neighboring 28th-ranked Ft. Worth-Arlington area to the mix) than any of the other metro areas that have prospered by offering cheaper alternatives to coastal cities, with lower taxes and generally more friendly business climates. Among them is No. 3 Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, Tenn.

    The metro area has seen rapid job growth, nearly 20.6% since 2011. Last year job growth was across the board, including a 4.1% expansion in manufacturing employment, 5.2% in business professional services, and 2.9% in the information sector.

    Like Dallas, Nashville has become a mecca for companies looking to relocate operations. Some, like UBS, are fleeing the high cost of places like New York or London. Others, like Lyft, are escaping high costs in coastal California. CKE Restaurants, owner of Carl’s Junior and Hardees, is moving operations from coastal California and St. Louis to set up shop in Nashville. All are bringing a diverse new range of jobs to the Music City.

    Other low-cost migration meccas include fourth-place Charlotte-Concord, Gastonia, No. 5 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, and No. 6 Salt Lake City. All boast growing tech centers with rapidly expanding STEM employment, as well as business and professional service growth.

    Boom Towns Get Pricier

    Some thriving metro areas on our list are becoming increasingly expensive, but they still don’t pack the tax and housing punch associated with blue state economies. No. 7 Austin-Round Rock, No. 9 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett and No. 11 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood have been big beneficiaries of the tech boom, and continue to attract migrants from areas like the Bay Area, where housing prices are still twice as high.

    It’s possible for older large cities with strongholds in key industries to generate strong job growth. New York’s population growth in 2016 may be half of what was in 2010, but financial sector job growth and associated professional service firms enable the Big Apple to rank a respectable 25th. Another high-cost area, Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, with its unparalleled concentration of elite colleges, ranks 30th.

    The picture is not so pretty in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, a region whose housing costs are almost as high as the Bay Area, with the same onerous state regulatory and tax burdens. It ranks 40th this year, with anemic 1.2% job growth in professional and business services over the past three years and 4% in financial services. The L.A. area continues to bleed manufacturing jobs, down 2.1% in the last year and 4.6% since 2013. Even retail and wholesale trade showed weakness in 2016, growing at a lowly 0.7% and 1.7% rate, respectively. The Information sector, highlighted by Snapchat’s splashy IPO, made the best showing for Tinseltown, with employment rising 4.2% in the last year. The sector, which includes entertainment, has seen employment expand an impressive 20.9% since the bottom of the recession in 2011.

    As has been the case almost every year in this millennium, the super-sized metro area doing worst is Chicago. It ranks 51st this year, down four places. Since the Great Recession, Chicago has managed modest job growth of 8.3%, and only a weak 0.7% expansion in 2016. Despite an uptick in financial services jobs over the past two years, and some ballyhooed relocations of corporate headquarters, the metro area has been losing jobs in information, manufacturing, and wholesale trade. Business services was up a scant 0.5% in the last year.

    Demographic Change and Changing Momentum

    The resurgence of expensive areas — notably New York and the San Francisco area — has been propelled largely by demographic trends, notably the movement of highly educated millennials to these areas. Yet as millennials begin to enter their 30s, and seek to buy homes and raise families, the momentum may be turning decisively to regions that are both less expensive but still have considerable appeal to educated workers. Most of the big gainers this year – Dallas, Orlando, Salt Lake, Raleigh, and No. 24 Indianapolis – have developed better inner-city amenities in recent years while keeping housing costs low.

    This shift is being driven in large part by unsustainable housing costs. In the Bay Area, techies are increasingly looking for jobs outside the tech hub, and some companies are even offering cash bonuses for those willing to leave. A recent poll indicated that 46% of Millennials want to leave the San Francisco Bay Area.

    It seems that some areas located in pro-business, low-tax states are increasingly attracting the educated millennials that we usually associate with places like San Francisco, Brooklyn or West L.A. Since 2010, among educated millennials, the fastest growth in migration has been to such lower-cost regions as Atlanta, Orlando, New Orleans, Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth.

    Over time, this migration could restructure the geography of job growth. As the middle class, particularly those of child-bearing age, continue moving out of states like California and into states like Texas. Utah or The Carolinas, the geography of skills changes. New families, a critical engine of job growth, are far more likely to form in Salt Lake City, the four large Texas metropolitan areas, or Atlanta, than in the bluest metropolitan areas like New York, Seattle, Los Angeles or San Francisco, where the number of school-age children trend well below the national average.

    Ultimately, we may be on the cusp of a new economic era in which the cost of housing and living becomes once again a key determinant in regional growth. This trend has been developing for years, but both demographics, notably the aging of millennials, and out of control costs could accelerate it. Many areas may wish to somehow emerge as “the new Silicon Valley,” just as they wished once to be the next “Wall Street” or “Hollywood.” Yet these iconic economies are difficult, to impossible, to duplicate. It might make more sense instead to look the success of places like Dallas — where lower costs are luring companies and talent at a level unrivaled in the nation.

    This piece originally appeared on Forbes.

    Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com. He is the Roger Hobbs Distinguished Fellow in Urban Studies at Chapman University and executive director of the Houston-based Center for Opportunity Urbanism. His newest book is The Human City: Urbanism for the rest of us. He is also author of The New Class ConflictThe City: A Global History, and The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050. He lives in Orange County, CA.

    Dr. Michael Shires primary areas of teaching and research include state, regional and local policy; technology and democracy; higher education policy; strategic, political and organizational issues in public policy; and quantitative analysis. He often serves as a consultant to local and state government on issues related to finance, education policy and governance. Dr. Shires has been quoted as an expert in various publications including USA TodayNewsweekThe EconomistThe Sacramento Bee, San Francisco Chronicle, and LA Times. He has also appeared as a guest commentator on CNN, KTLA and KCAL to name a few.

    Photo by Diann Bayes, obtained via Flickr using a CC License.

  • All Cities Rankings – 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2017
    Overall Ranking
    Area Weighted INDEX 2016 Nonfarm Eplmnt (1000s) Overall Movement 2016 to 2017  2017 Size 
    1 Provo-Orem, UT 99.0         243.4 1  M 
    2 Lake Charles, LA 97.1         111.3 18  S 
    3 St. George, UT 96.5           61.8 -2  S 
    4 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metro Div 96.4      2,554.6 5  L 
    5 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Metro Div 96.2      1,108.6 -2  L 
    6 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 95.6         249.5 0  M 
    7 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 95.5         968.8 1  L 
    8 Fort Collins, CO 94.3         162.6 4  M 
    9 The Villages, FL 94.1           27.9 13  S 
    10 Gainesville, GA 93.8           88.4 -6  S 
    11 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 93.2      1,170.0 10  L 
    12 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 93.1      1,233.2 -5  L 
    13 Salt Lake City, UT 92.6         713.6 23  L 
    14 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 92.6         350.5 5  M 
    15 Austin-Round Rock, TX 92.6      1,015.4 -4  L 
    16 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 92.1      1,084.7 -11  L 
    17 Boise City, ID 92.0         311.0 16  M 
    18 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 90.7         249.8 -3  M 
    19 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metro Div 90.4      1,664.4 7  L 
    20 Raleigh, NC 89.7         610.1 3  L 
    21 Olympia-Tumwater, WA 89.7         114.7 64  S 
    22 Wenatchee, WA 89.5           44.1 7  S 
    23 Auburn-Opelika, AL 89.3           63.8 24  S 
    24 Bend-Redmond, OR 88.0           78.5 -10  S 
    25 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 87.1      1,442.3 -7  L 
    26 Savannah, GA 86.6         177.9 -10  M 
    27 Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL 86.1           71.4 -2  S 
    28 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 85.8      1,027.9 0  L 
    29 Coeur d’Alene, ID 85.6           60.6 12  S 
    30 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 84.6         262.6 -13  M 
    31 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 84.4      2,721.2 -1  L 
    32 Tacoma-Lakewood, WA Metro Div 84.2         309.8 44  M 
    33 Boulder, CO 83.6         188.2 34  M 
    34 Killeen-Temple, TX 83.4         146.5 35  S 
    35 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL 83.4         301.9 28  M 
    36 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 83.1         132.7 23  S 
    37 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 82.7      1,436.3 -2  L 
    38 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Metro Div 81.6         623.6 12  L 
    39 Punta Gorda, FL 80.8           48.9 26  S 
    40 Portsmouth, NH-ME NECTA 80.6           90.6 -1  S 
    41 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 80.5      1,153.4 -17  L 
    42 Bowling Green, KY 80.2           76.3 61  S 
    43 Port St. Lucie, FL 79.9         146.4 0  S 
    44 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 79.7         551.2 40  L 
    45 Merced, CA 79.4           65.7 52  S 
    46 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL 79.3         145.2 -2  S 
    47 Spartanburg, SC 79.2         149.4 23  S 
    48 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metro Div 78.7      1,180.1 23  L 
    49 Fresno, CA 78.7         339.1 8  M 
    50 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 78.5      1,321.1 31  L 
    51 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 78.4         670.8 31  L 
    52 Asheville, NC 78.2         188.7 20  M 
    53 Trenton, NJ 78.0         269.6 8  M 
    54 Wilmington, NC 77.7         123.5 66  S 
    55 Cleveland, TN 77.7           51.7 76  S 
    56 Jonesboro, AR 77.6           56.5 -22  S 
    57 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV 77.5         964.6 11  L 
    58 Visalia-Porterville, CA 77.3         125.6 -4  S 
    59 Jacksonville, FL 76.9         677.5 -11  L 
    60 College Station-Bryan, TX 76.8         116.5 -29  S 
    61 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Metro Div 76.8      1,150.1 34  L 
    62 Idaho Falls, ID 76.7           63.9 16  S 
    63 Bellingham, WA 76.5           92.0 100  S 
    64 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 76.5      1,056.9 29  L 
    65 Stockton-Lodi, CA 76.4         227.9 -14  M 
    66 Modesto, CA 76.3         173.5 41  M 
    67 Salem, OR 76.1         162.1 7  M 
    68 El Paso, TX 75.7         315.1 36  M 
    69 New York City, NY 75.6      4,388.9 -32  L 
    70 Columbus, OH 75.6      1,077.8 22  L 
    71 Colorado Springs, CO 75.6         281.6 16  M 
    72 Columbus, IN 75.1           52.9 -62  S 
    73 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 74.9         101.4 68  S 
    74 Chico, CA 74.8           81.7 73  S 
    75 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 74.8      2,015.6 -37  L 
    76 Reno, NV 74.5         225.1 36  M 
    77 Kennewick-Richland, WA 74.3         110.6 33  S 
    78 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Div 74.0      1,023.6 10  L 
    79 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 74.0         360.1 56  M 
    80 Haverhill-Newburyport-Amesbury Town, MA-NH NECTA Div 73.9           66.2 -48  S 
    81 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 73.5         199.3 45  M 
    82 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 73.3           52.1 46  S 
    83 Sioux Falls, SD 72.8         153.4 -31  M 
    84 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 72.8      1,439.0 6  L 
    85 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, CA 72.3         114.5 -39  S 
    86 Gainesville, FL 72.2         143.3 75  S 
    87 Lexington-Fayette, KY 72.1         281.2 13  M 
    88 Logan, UT-ID 72.1           60.9 -28  S 
    89 Madera, CA 72.1           37.3 29  S 
    90 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Metro Div 71.8         836.9 -15  L 
    91 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Div 71.8      1,831.6 36  L 
    92 Dover-Durham, NH-ME NECTA 71.6           54.6 150  S 
    93 Kansas City, MO 71.6         608.6 91  L 
    94 Fargo, ND-MN 71.5         142.2 -38  S 
    95 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 71.4         307.1 43  M 
    96 San Rafael, CA Metro Div 71.4         115.9 9  S 
    97 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 71.3         219.6 32  M 
    98 Laredo, TX 71.2         104.2 -49  S 
    99 Napa, CA 71.2           70.9 -86  S 
    100 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC 71.0         154.1 -60  M 
    101 Lubbock, TX 71.0         146.9 -5  S 
    102 Yakima, WA 71.0           84.5 42  S 
    103 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 70.9         143.0 33  S 
    104 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 70.8         256.4 2  M 
    105 Charlottesville, VA 70.8         115.5 -43  S 
    106 Waco, TX 70.2         119.8 82  S 
    107 Iowa City, IA 70.1         101.9 52  S 
    108 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 69.9         412.4 -50  M 
    109 Yuba City, CA 69.9           43.4 21  S 
    110 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 69.6         109.8 79  S 
    111 Santa Rosa, CA 69.4         202.0 -45  M 
    112 Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA 69.3         958.1 22  L 
    113 Greeley, CO 68.9         100.3 -86  S 
    114 Salinas, CA 68.8         137.9 0  S 
    115 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 68.7         137.2 -24  S 
    116 Tyler, TX 68.5         106.0 -5  S 
    117 Medford, OR 68.3           86.2 33  S 
    118 Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Beaufort, SC 67.9           75.5 -73  S 
    119 Kokomo, IN 67.7           42.4 109  S 
    120 Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH NECTA Div 67.6         155.0 76  M 
    121 Albany, OR 67.6           44.0 114  S 
    122 Lewiston, ID-WA 66.9           28.7 99  S 
    123 Grants Pass, OR 66.3           25.8 39  S 
    124 Huntsville, AL 66.0         228.8 77  M 
    125 Philadelphia City, PA 65.6         714.0 99  L 
    126 Ocala, FL 65.4         103.5 81  S 
    127 Madison, WI 65.0         399.4 10  M 
    128 Sebring, FL 64.9           27.1 101  S 
    129 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 64.8         237.3 110  M 
    130 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metro Div 64.4      1,236.6 2  L 
    131 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 64.4         174.3 59  M 
    132 Springfield, MO 64.4         212.6 -13  M 
    133 Redding, CA 64.0           66.1 61  S 
    134 Walla Walla, WA 63.4           28.2 125  S 
    135 Elizabethtown-Fort Knox, KY 62.5           57.2 -46  S 
    136 Prescott, AZ 62.5           62.6 -59  S 
    137 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ 62.4         895.9 23  L 
    138 Harrisonburg, VA 62.0           68.4 157  S 
    139 Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, HI 61.8           75.2 -53  S 
    140 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Metro Div 61.7      1,592.2 -41  L 
    141 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 61.7      3,017.5 -62  L 
    142 Winchester, VA-WV 61.7           62.5 -87  S 
    143 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 61.3           49.1 31  S 
    144 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA 61.3         242.3 47  M 
    145 Ames, IA 61.0           54.0 -81  S 
    146 Jackson, TN 60.6           68.8 56  S 
    147 Northern Virginia, VA 60.5      1,449.9 40  L 
    148 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metro Div 60.5      4,442.2 34  L 
    149 Sherman-Denison, TX 60.3           46.7 20  S 
    150 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 59.8         213.4 90  M 
    151 Ithaca, NY 59.7           64.9 98  S 
    152 Kansas City, KS 59.4         469.2 -36  L 
    153 Columbia, SC 59.4         395.4 -70  M 
    154 Lincoln, NE 59.4         189.9 27  M 
    155 New Bedford, MA NECTA 59.3           68.2 13  S 
    156 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Div 59.1      2,653.9 1  L 
    157 Chattanooga, TN-GA 58.9         255.5 -2  M 
    158 Lawrence-Methuen Town-Salem, MA-NH NECTA Div 58.9           82.6 -116  S 
    159 Ann Arbor, MI 58.7         220.3 7  M 
    160 Knoxville, TN 58.6         395.7 -52  M 
    161 Panama City, FL 58.5           82.6 10  S 
    162 Barnstable Town, MA NECTA 58.5         100.6 3  S 
    163 Eugene, OR 58.5         158.4 10  M 
    164 Corvallis, OR 58.0           42.2 8  S 
    165 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 57.7         235.5 122  M 
    166 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA 57.6         182.9 -44  M 
    167 Grand Forks, ND-MN 57.5           59.0 103  S 
    168 Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton, MA NECTA Div 57.4           81.6 -47  S 
    169 Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN 57.4         104.8 -27  S 
    170 Clarksville, TN-KY 57.0           89.8 -97  S 
    171 Brunswick, GA 57.0           43.5 15  S 
    172 Richmond, VA 56.8         666.4 -119  L 
    173 Tallahassee, FL 55.9         181.7 141  M 
    174 Tuscaloosa, AL 55.7         105.9 -73  S 
    175 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 55.6      1,087.6 43  L 
    176 Athens-Clarke County, GA 55.5           94.4 -63  S 
    177 Flagstaff, AZ 55.3           66.2 1  S 
    178 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 54.9      1,964.8 1  L 
    179 Lancaster, PA 54.8         250.3 6  M 
    180 Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD 54.5         404.3 35  M 
    181 Pueblo, CO 54.3           62.2 -32  S 
    182 Appleton, WI 54.0         125.9 18  S 
    183 El Centro, CA 53.8           53.0 -27  S 
    184 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 53.5         148.2 27  S 
    185 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 53.3         500.1 7  L 
    186 Missoula, MT 53.2           59.8 -9  S 
    187 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Metro Div 52.6      1,337.8 65  L 
    188 Billings, MT 52.5           84.9 -71  S 
    189 Salisbury, MD-DE 52.3         149.7 -65  S 
    190 Manchester, NH NECTA 51.8         110.9 -37  S 
    191 Baton Rouge, LA 51.7         405.2 -97  M 
    192 Hattiesburg, MS 51.5           64.4 -34  S 
    193 Manhattan, KS 51.4           44.6 -113  S 
    194 Morristown, TN 51.3           46.2 4  S 
    195 Urban Honolulu, HI 50.9         481.1 8  L 
    196 Columbia, MO 50.5           99.9 -98  S 
    197 Camden, NJ Metro Div 50.1         540.4 75  L 
    198 Yuma, AZ 49.8           55.9 21  S 
    199 St. Cloud, MN 49.4         108.4 -54  S 
    200 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 49.3         305.9 101  M 
    201 Florence, SC 48.9           88.2 -4  S 
    202 Las Cruces, NM 48.5           73.2 141  S 
    203 Rochester, MN 48.4         118.5 7  S 
    204 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN 48.3           79.0 70  S 
    205 Rapid City, SD 48.0           65.8 99  S 
    206 Springfield, MA-CT NECTA 47.5         334.8 79  M 
    207 Hinesville, GA 47.2           20.3 126  S 
    208 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 47.0         466.5 102  L 
    209 Toledo, OH 46.8         313.5 32  M 
    210 Fort Wayne, IN 46.7         221.0 -30  M 
    211 Warner Robins, GA 46.7           73.3 125  S 
    212 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Metro Div 46.7      3,717.2 -8  L 
    213 Portland-South Portland, ME NECTA 46.7         200.9 100  M 
    214 Mankato-North Mankato, MN 46.6           57.7 6  S 
    215 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 46.4         108.9 87  S 
    216 Amarillo, TX 46.3         121.4 -21  S 
    217 Dover, DE 45.9           69.3 0  S 
    218 Delaware County, PA 45.9         235.9 37  M 
    219 Burlington, NC 45.9           61.7 102  S 
    220 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 45.9           96.8 64  S 
    221 Bismarck, ND 45.8           73.5 -119  S 
    222 Topeka, KS 45.7         113.4 155  S 
    223 Pocatello, ID 45.6           35.8 -48  S 
    224 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Metro Div 45.5      1,058.2 40  L 
    225 Framingham, MA NECTA Div 45.5         173.9 1  M 
    226 Worcester, MA-CT NECTA 45.2         284.1 32  M 
    227 Oklahoma City, OK 45.0         628.3 -94  L 
    228 Lawrence, KS 44.9           54.7 40  S 
    229 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY 44.9         712.1 -13  L 
    230 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 44.8           48.5 75  S 
    231 Gadsden, AL 44.5           38.6 6  S 
    232 Sheboygan, WI 44.5           61.8 90  S 
    233 Lewiston-Auburn, ME NECTA 44.2           51.7 50  S 
    234 Janesville-Beloit, WI 43.7           67.6 -88  S 
    235 Bakersfield, CA 43.5         258.1 -126  M 
    236 Midland, TX 43.2           87.5 -97  S 
    237 Fond du Lac, WI 42.9           48.4 56  S 
    238 Staunton-Waynesboro, VA 42.7           50.8 116  S 
    239 Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead, MA NECTA Div 42.7           45.2 -8  S 
    240 Lebanon, PA 42.7           52.0 87  S 
    241 Jackson, MS 42.6         280.2 10  M 
    242 Macon, GA 42.6         103.5 -43  S 
    243 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 42.6         928.9 26  L 
    244 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 42.2           38.5 -90  S 
    245 Rome, GA 42.0           41.3 72  S 
    246 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 41.8         142.9 -32  S 
    247 Gettysburg, PA 41.5           34.8 106  S 
    248 Hammond, LA 41.5           45.1 92  S 
    249 Glens Falls, NY 41.4           54.9 67  S 
    250 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 41.2         577.0 -42  L 
    251 State College, PA 41.2           78.0 81  S 
    252 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 40.9           89.1 -69  S 
    253 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 40.7         646.2 7  L 
    254 Nashua, NH-MA NECTA Div 40.7         129.3 77  S 
    255 Morgantown, WV 40.6           70.9 -85  S 
    256 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 40.6           77.5 -51  S 
    257 St. Louis, MO-IL 40.6      1,368.7 16  L 
    258 Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ 40.5           60.1 132  S 
    259 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Metro Div 40.5         598.0 -23  L 
    260 Burlington-South Burlington, VT NECTA 40.5         124.9 -117  S 
    261 Springfield, IL 40.4         115.7 42  S 
    262 Battle Creek, MI 40.1           59.4 5  S 
    263 Peabody-Salem-Beverly, MA NECTA Div 40.0           97.1 49  S 
    264 Longview, WA 39.9           39.1 -124  S 
    265 Ocean City, NJ 39.6           35.9 -114  S 
    266 Owensboro, KY 39.3           53.5 -73  S 
    267 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 39.2         339.0 -24  M 
    268 St. Joseph, MO-KS 39.2           63.9 26  S 
    269 Greenville, NC 39.1           79.3 -16  S 
    270 Winston-Salem, NC 39.0         262.3 -23  M 
    271 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 38.9         151.9 110  M 
    272 Grand Island, NE 38.8           42.5 93  S 
    273 Valdosta, GA 38.8           56.5 4  S 
    274 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 38.5         361.6 -49  M 
    275 Leominster-Gardner, MA NECTA 38.4           51.8 -12  S 
    276 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 38.1         565.7 86  L 
    277 Reading, PA 37.6         178.5 -64  M 
    278 San Angelo, TX 37.6           48.8 -130  S 
    279 Gary, IN Metro Div 37.1         280.2 73  M 
    280 Dubuque, IA 36.8           60.2 -116  S 
    281 Danbury, CT NECTA 36.7           79.5 -2  S 
    282 Wausau, WI 36.7           73.0 -52  S 
    283 Dalton, GA 36.7           69.8 -26  S 
    284 Corpus Christi, TX 36.4         191.0 -161  M 
    285 Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metro Div 36.3         359.8 -118  M 
    286 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Metro Div 36.1         753.3 23  L 
    287 Albuquerque, NM 36.1         390.1 55  M 
    288 East Stroudsburg, PA 35.9           57.7 67  S 
    289 Baltimore City, MD 35.8         367.5 59  M 
    290 York-Hanover, PA 35.8         184.5 -63  M 
    291 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 35.8         354.8 -53  M 
    292 Greensboro-High Point, NC 35.4         361.6 -44  M 
    293 Sumter, SC 34.8           39.2 -31  S 
    294 California-Lexington Park, MD 34.6           45.2 -23  S 
    295 Kankakee, IL 34.4           44.9 -4  S 
    296 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 34.3         582.6 -16  L 
    297 Montgomery, AL 34.0         173.4 47  M 
    298 Bloomsburg-Berwick, PA 33.7           42.4 31  S 
    299 Monroe, MI 33.5           42.1 -147  S 
    300 Albany, GA 33.5           63.2 75  S 
    301 New Bern, NC 33.3           44.9 -13  S 
    302 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 33.2           87.8 -93  S 
    303 Jackson, MI 33.0           57.4 98  S 
    304 Chambersburg-Waynesboro, PA 32.5           60.1 -179  S 
    305 Kingston, NY 32.4           62.0 36  S 
    306 Roanoke, VA 32.3         163.5 -17  M 
    307 Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metro Div 32.2         404.0 -74  M 
    308 Green Bay, WI 32.0         173.9 -22  M 
    309 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 31.4           57.2 40  S 
    310 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 31.4         522.9 14  L 
    311 Akron, OH 31.2         340.8 -99  M 
    312 Tulsa, OK 31.1         444.4 -90  M 
    313 Johnson City, TN 30.9           80.0 -16  S 
    314 Dayton, OH 30.7         385.4 -32  M 
    315 Fayetteville, NC 30.5         130.6 36  S 
    316 Evansville, IN-KY 30.4         159.0 31  M 
    317 Taunton-Middleborough-Norton, MA NECTA Div 30.3           59.5 18  S 
    318 Cheyenne, WY 30.1           46.0 -112  S 
    319 Jacksonville, NC 30.1           49.0 -19  S 
    320 Odessa, TX 29.9           69.7 -144  S 
    321 Carson City, NV 29.6           28.6 89  S 
    322 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 28.9           61.1 -46  S 
    323 Eau Claire, WI 28.9           85.2 -58  S 
    324 Rochester, NY 28.8         532.9 52  L 
    325 Duluth, MN-WI 28.8         135.3 47  S 
    326 Jefferson City, MO 28.6           77.3 67  S 
    327 Tucson, AZ 28.5         377.8 -93  M 
    328 Cedar Rapids, IA 28.4         143.9 -29  S 
    329 Monroe, LA 28.3           79.5 17  S 
    330 Champaign-Urbana, IL 28.1         109.8 -7  S 
    331 Muncie, IN 28.1           52.0 -75  S 
    332 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 27.9         768.4 -13  L 
    333 Victoria, TX 27.9           42.2 -218  S 
    334 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 27.7         857.0 -26  L 
    335 Cleveland-Elyria, OH 27.7      1,051.8 2  L 
    336 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 27.6         571.5 -30  L 
    337 Mobile, AL 27.5         179.0 23  M 
    338 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 27.5         122.4 -48  S 
    339 Abilene, TX 27.4           68.3 -28  S 
    340 Midland, MI 27.3           37.4 -95  S 
    341 Bloomington, IN 26.5           77.5 47  S 
    342 Pittsburgh, PA 26.4      1,165.0 14  L 
    343 Norwich-New London-Westerly, CT-RI NECTA 26.4         129.0 27  S 
    344 New Haven, CT NECTA 26.0         281.7 -16  M 
    345 Santa Fe, NM 26.0           63.5 -53  S 
    346 Canton-Massillon, OH 25.7         171.7 -8  M 
    347 Syracuse, NY 25.6         317.6 35  M 
    348 Elgin, IL Metro Div 25.1         253.1 -102  M 
    349 Hot Springs, AR 24.9           37.5 1  S 
    350 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY 24.8           42.0 -20  S 
    351 Saginaw, MI 24.8           89.1 -97  S 
    352 Lawton, OK 24.8           45.9 -26  S 
    353 Terre Haute, IN 24.6           71.6 34  S 
    354 Great Falls, MT 24.5           35.9 -9  S 
    355 Wichita, KS 24.0         296.9 -57  M 
    356 Texarkana, TX-AR 23.8           60.6 -90  S 
    357 Homosassa Springs, FL 23.8           33.3 -23  S 
    358 Flint, MI 23.4         140.7 21  S 
    359 Newark, NJ-PA Metro Div 23.2      1,193.8 -20  L 
    360 Lima, OH 23.1           52.9 -53  S 
    361 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS 23.1         154.0 2  M 
    362 Grand Junction, CO 22.7           60.9 -87  S 
    363 Columbus, GA-AL 22.7         121.5 5  S 
    364 Dothan, AL 22.4           57.8 35  S 
    365 Lynchburg, VA 22.0         104.5 1  S 
    366 Anchorage, AK 22.0         173.7 -88  M 
    367 Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, PA 21.8         261.1 6  M 
    368 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA 21.4         407.9 -50  M 
    369 Muskegon, MI 21.2           62.7 -108  S 
    370 Casper, WY 21.1           37.1 -89  S 
    371 Joplin, MO 20.6           80.9 -56  S 
    372 Fort Smith, AR-OK 20.6         113.9 8  S 
    373 Utica-Rome, NY 20.5         126.5 19  S 
    374 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 20.4           91.1 0  S 
    375 Cumberland, MD-WV 20.3           39.2 38  S 
    376 Cape Girardeau, MO-IL 20.1           44.5 -7  S 
    377 Racine, WI 20.0           76.9 7  S 
    378 Bangor, ME NECTA 20.0           66.4 -19  S 
    379 Carbondale-Marion, IL 19.8           57.2 -147  S 
    380 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 19.1         182.9 25  M 
    381 Longview, TX 19.1           96.8 -61  S 
    382 Rocky Mount, NC 19.0           58.0 16  S 
    383 Bay City, MI 18.9           36.4 17  S 
    384 Altoona, PA 17.7           60.7 -23  S 
    385 Houma-Thibodaux, LA 17.6           86.5 -60  S 
    386 Mansfield, OH 17.3           52.6 22  S 
    387 Rockford, IL 17.0         150.0 -137  S 
    388 Binghamton, NY 16.6         104.3 29  S 
    389 Pittsfield, MA NECTA 16.1           41.4 -145  S 
    390 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 15.8         128.3 29  S 
    391 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 15.7         163.7 -168  M 
    392 Decatur, IL 15.5           51.4 -14  S 
    393 Dutchess County-Putnam County, NY Metro Div 15.4         143.5 -22  S 
    394 Alexandria, LA 15.0           63.2 -30  S 
    395 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 14.8         138.8 12  S 
    396 Waterbury, CT NECTA 14.4           67.0 -7  S 
    397 Pine Bluff, AR 14.0           33.5 23  S 
    398 Lafayette, LA 14.0         198.5 -40  M 
    399 Farmington, NM 14.0           48.4 -103  S 
    400 Decatur, AL 13.0           53.6 4  S 
    401 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 12.5         223.7 -7  M 
    402 Erie, PA 11.7         127.8 -17  S 
    403 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL 11.6           45.8 12  S 
    404 Wheeling, WV-OH 11.3           66.4 -8  S 
    405 Goldsboro, NC 11.2           41.7 -48  S 
    406 Wichita Falls, TX 10.7           57.5 -15  S 
    407 Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ 10.3           34.5 11  S 
    408 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 10.3           41.3 3  S 
    409 Fairbanks, AK 10.2           36.1 -14  S 
    410 Williamsport, PA 10.2           53.3 -27  S 
    411 Bloomington, IL 9.6           93.0 -9  S 
    412 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 9.5         180.1 -9  M 
    413 Springfield, OH 9.3           49.6 -7  S 
    414 Parkersburg-Vienna, WV 9.1           40.8 0  S 
    415 Danville, IL 8.7           28.6 -48  S 
    416 Elmira, NY 8.6           37.7 -7  S 
    417 Peoria, IL 7.2         173.0 -31  M 
    418 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 6.8           41.0 -21  S 
    419 Charleston, WV 6.0         118.9 -3  S 
    420 Johnstown, PA 4.3           55.6 1  S 
    421 Beckley, WV 3.5           44.7 -9  S 

     

  • Large Cities Rankings – 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    2017 Large MSA Ranking Area 2017
    Weighted INDEX
    2016 Nonfarm Employment (1000s) Size Movement 2016-2017
    1 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metro Div 96.4        2,554.6 4
    2 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Metro Div 96.2        1,108.6 -1
    3 Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN 95.5           968.8 1
    4 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 93.2        1,170.0 4
    5 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 93.1        1,233.2 -2
    6 Salt Lake City, UT 92.6           713.6 9
    7 Austin-Round Rock, TX 92.6        1,015.4 -1
    8 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 92.1        1,084.7 -6
    9 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metro Div 90.4        1,664.4 2
    10 Raleigh, NC 89.7           610.1 -1
    11 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 87.1        1,442.3 -4
    12 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 85.8        1,027.9 0
    13 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 84.4        2,721.2 0
    14 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 82.7        1,436.3 0
    15 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Metro Div 81.6           623.6 4
    16 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 80.5        1,153.4 -6
    17 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 79.7           551.2 10
    18 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metro Div 78.7        1,180.1 4
    19 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 78.5        1,321.1 6
    20 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 78.4           670.8 6
    21 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV 77.5           964.6 0
    22 Jacksonville, FL 76.9           677.5 -4
    23 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Metro Div 76.8        1,150.1 9
    24 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 76.5        1,056.9 7
    25 New York City, NY 75.6        4,388.9 -9
    26 Columbus, OH 75.6        1,077.8 4
    27 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 74.8        2,015.6 -10
    28 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metro Div 74.0        1,023.6 0
    29 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 72.8        1,439.0 0
    30 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Metro Div 71.8           836.9 -7
    31 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Division 71.8        1,831.6 4
    32 Kansas City, MO 71.6           608.6 11
    33 Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA 69.3           958.1 5
    34 Philadelphia City, PA 65.6           714.0 17
    35 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Metro Div 64.4        1,236.6 1
    36 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ 62.4           895.9 4
    37 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Metro Div 61.7        1,592.2 -4
    38 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 61.7        3,017.5 -14
    39 Northern Virginia, VA 60.5        1,449.9 5
    40 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metro Div 60.5        4,442.2 2
    41 Kansas City, KS 59.4           469.2 -7
    42 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Div 59.1        2,653.9 -3
    43 Richmond, VA 56.8           666.4 -23
    44 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 55.6        1,087.6 6
    45 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 54.9        1,964.8 -4
    46 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 53.3           500.1 -1
    47 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Metro Div 52.6        1,337.8 6
    48 Urban Honolulu, HI 50.9           481.1 -2
    49 Camden, NJ Metro Div 50.1           540.4 8
    50 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 47.0           466.5 13
    51 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Metro Div 46.7        3,717.2 -4
    52 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Metro Div 45.5        1,058.2 3
    53 Oklahoma City, OK 45.0           628.3 -16
    54 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY 44.9           712.1 -5
    55 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 42.6           928.9 1
    56 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 41.2           577.0 -8
    57 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 40.7           646.2 -3
    58 St. Louis, MO-IL 40.6        1,368.7 0
    59 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Metro Div 40.5           598.0 -7
    60 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 38.1           565.7 9
    61 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Metro Div 36.1           753.3 1
    62 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 34.3           582.6 -3
    63 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 31.4           522.9 2
    64 Rochester, NY 28.8           532.9 6
    65 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 27.9           768.4 -1
    66 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 27.7           857.0 -5
    67 Cleveland-Elyria, OH 27.7        1,051.8 -1
    68 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 27.6           571.5 -8
    69 Pittsburgh, PA 26.4        1,165.0 -1
    70 Newark, NJ-PA Metro Div 23.2        1,193.8 -3

     

  • Mid Sized Cities Rankings – 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

    Read about how we selected the 2017 Best Cities for Job Growth

     

    2017 Midsized MSA Rankings Area Weighted INDEX 2016 Nonfarm Employment (1000s) Size Movement 2016-2017
    1 Provo-Orem, UT 99.0         243.4 0
    2 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 95.6         249.5 0
    3 Fort Collins, CO 94.3         162.6 0
    4 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 92.6         350.5 3
    5 Boise City, ID 92.0         311.0 3
    6 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 90.7         249.8 -2
    7 Savannah, GA 86.6         177.9 -2
    8 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 84.6         262.6 -2
    9 Tacoma-Lakewood, WA Metro Div 84.2         309.8 11
    10 Boulder, CO 83.6         188.2 7
    11 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL 83.4         301.9 4
    12 Fresno, CA 78.7         339.1 0
    13 Asheville, NC 78.2         188.7 5
    14 Trenton, NJ 78.0         269.6 0
    15 Stockton-Lodi, CA 76.4         227.9 -5
    16 Modesto, CA 76.3         173.5 11
    17 Salem, OR 76.1         162.1 2
    18 El Paso, TX 75.7         315.1 7
    19 Colorado Springs, CO 75.6         281.6 3
    20 Reno, NV 74.5         225.1 10
    21 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 74.0         360.1 16
    22 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 73.5         199.3 13
    23 Sioux Falls, SD 72.8         153.4 -12
    24 Lexington-Fayette, KY 72.1         281.2 0
    25 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 71.4         307.1 14
    26 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 71.3         219.6 10
    27 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC 71.0         154.1 -18
    28 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 70.8         256.4 -2
    29 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC 69.9         412.4 -16
    30 Santa Rosa, CA 69.4         202.0 -14
    31 Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford, MA-NH NECTA Div 67.6         155.0 18
    32 Huntsville, AL 66.0         228.8 17
    33 Madison, WI 65.0         399.4 5
    34 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 64.8         237.3 27
    35 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 64.4         174.3 12
    36 Springfield, MO 64.4         212.6 -5
    37 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA 61.3         242.3 11
    38 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 59.8         213.4 24
    39 Columbia, SC 59.4         395.4 -18
    40 Lincoln, NE 59.4         189.9 5
    41 Chattanooga, TN-GA 58.9         255.5 -1
    42 Ann Arbor, MI 58.7         220.3 -1
    43 Knoxville, TN 58.6         395.7 -15
    44 Eugene, OR 58.5         158.4 -1
    45 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 57.7         235.5 31
    46 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA 57.6         182.9 -14
    47 Tallahassee, FL 55.9         181.7 34
    48 Lancaster, PA 54.8         250.3 -2
    49 Calvert-Charles-Prince George’s, MD 54.5         404.3 3
    50 Baton Rouge, LA 51.7         405.2 -27
    51 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 49.3         305.9 28
    52 Springfield, MA-CT NECTA 47.5         334.8 22
    53 Toledo, OH 46.8         313.5 10
    54 Fort Wayne, IN 46.7         221.0 -10
    55 Portland-South Portland, ME NECTA 46.7         200.9 25
    56 Delaware County, PA 45.9         235.9 14
    57 Framingham, MA NECTA Div 45.5         173.9 -1
    58 Worcester, MA-CT NECTA 45.2         284.1 13
    59 Bakersfield, CA 43.5         258.1 -30
    60 Jackson, MS 42.6         280.2 9
    61 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 39.2         339.0 3
    62 Winston-Salem, NC 39.0         262.3 4
    63 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 38.9         151.9 31
    64 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 38.5         361.6 -9
    65 Reading, PA 37.6         178.5 -14
    66 Gary, IN Metro Div 37.1         280.2 23
    67 Corpus Christi, TX 36.4         191.0 -34
    68 Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metro Div 36.3         359.8 -26
    69 Albuquerque, NM 36.1         390.1 16
    70 Baltimore City, MD 35.8         367.5 18
    71 York-Hanover, PA 35.8         184.5 -14
    72 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 35.8         354.8 -12
    73 Greensboro-High Point, NC 35.4         361.6 -6
    74 Montgomery, AL 34.0         173.4 12
    75 Roanoke, VA 32.3         163.5 2
    76 Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metro Div 32.2         404.0 -18
    77 Green Bay, WI 32.0         173.9 -2
    78 Akron, OH 31.2         340.8 -28
    79 Tulsa, OK 31.1         444.4 -26
    80 Dayton, OH 30.7         385.4 -7
    81 Evansville, IN-KY 30.4         159.0 6
    82 Tucson, AZ 28.5         377.8 -23
    83 Mobile, AL 27.5         179.0 8
    84 New Haven, CT NECTA 26.0         281.7 -1
    85 Canton-Massillon, OH 25.7         171.7 -1
    86 Syracuse, NY 25.6         317.6 8
    87 Elgin, IL Metro Div 25.1         253.1 -22
    88 Wichita, KS 24.0         296.9 -10
    89 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS 23.1         154.0 3
    90 Anchorage, AK 22.0         173.7 -18
    91 Scranton–Wilkes-Barre–Hazleton, PA 21.8         261.1 2
    92 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT NECTA 21.4         407.9 -10
    93 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 19.1         182.9 5
    94 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 15.7         163.7 -40
    95 Lafayette, LA 14.0         198.5 -5
    96 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 12.5         223.7 0
    97 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 9.5         180.1 0
    98 Peoria, IL 7.2         173.0 -3